Guosen Securities(SZ:002736) Guoxin Securities·2025-12-14 11:07Core Insights - The report concludes that both DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3 Pro possess certain technical analysis capabilities, with Gemini showing superior usability and accuracy in identifying market trends and trading points [1][3]. Group 1: Technical Analysis Capabilities - Both models demonstrate a foundational understanding of technical analysis, effectively identifying patterns and structures in limited candlestick data [2][3]. - Gemini 3 Pro excels in recognizing complex relationships and patterns, providing clear and logical outputs, while DeepSeek V3.2 also performs well but with some discrepancies in finer details [2][3]. - The evaluation of both models is based on a controlled testing environment, ensuring fairness in data sources, task instructions, and assessment criteria [2][17]. Group 2: Performance Comparison - In analyzing established market trends, both models show systematic approaches, but they differ in their classification of market structures, leading to variations in their conclusions [3][41]. - Gemini 3 Pro has been noted for its superior predictive capabilities, particularly in identifying key market turning points and trends, aligning closely with actual market movements [3][41]. - The report highlights specific instances where Gemini's predictions were more accurate compared to DeepSeek, particularly in the context of market dynamics and trading strategies [3][41]. Group 3: Data and Methodology - The testing utilized standardized OHLC price data from the Shanghai Composite Index, ensuring consistency across both models [2][17]. - The core instructions for both models were identical, focusing on the execution of technical analysis tasks in a structured manner [2][17]. - The evaluation framework included multiple layers, assessing basic rule adherence, recursive structure analysis, dynamic judgment capabilities, and overall coherence of outputs [13][14].