Workflow
德训鞋,正成为运动爱好者的百搭单品

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of modern training shoes, particularly the German Army Trainer (德训鞋), highlighting their dual appeal in both fitness and fashion markets, and their evolution from military origins to trendy footwear [4][15][22]. Group 1: Market Trends - Modern training shoes are gaining popularity among both office workers seeking comfort and fitness enthusiasts prioritizing functionality [4]. - The sales trend of training shoes is increasing, driven by their stylish design and versatility for both casual wear and workouts [5][7]. - The emergence of various brands reinterpreting the traditional training shoe has created a "despise chain" in the market, where certain high-end brands are favored over others [7][9]. Group 2: Historical Background - The German Army Trainer was first produced in the 1930s for soldiers, with its design attributed to the Dassler brothers, who later founded Adidas and Puma [15][16]. - The shoe gained fame when worn by Jesse Owens during the 1936 Olympics, marking its significance in sports history [15]. - Post-World War II, the shoe transitioned into the vintage market, becoming popular in Europe due to its durability and unique design [16]. Group 3: Product Features - Modern training shoes retain the hard sole characteristic, providing necessary support for weight training and preventing injuries [11][35]. - They are designed to be versatile, suitable for various sports activities, including running and jumping, while ensuring comfort and stability [30][33]. - The shoes are made with high-quality materials, such as suede and leather, ensuring breathability and durability [28][35]. Group 4: Brand Landscape - A wide range of brands offers training shoes at different price points, from affordable options like Li Ning and Feiyue to high-end brands like Maison Margiela and Dior Homme [43][40]. - The market includes both international brands and emerging domestic brands, catering to diverse consumer preferences [21][38]. - The article emphasizes that there is no "despise chain" in training shoes; various brands meet different consumer needs and price ranges [41].