XIAOMI(HK:01810) 36氪·2025-05-07 00:08Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent legal victory of Xiaomi against a counterfeit brand "Xiaomi Zero Degree," highlighting the ongoing battle against trademark infringement and the prevalence of counterfeit products in the market [4][14][48]. Group 1: Legal Case Overview - Xiaomi sued "Xiaomi Zero Degree" for trademark infringement and unfair competition, resulting in a court ruling that awarded Xiaomi 30 million yuan in damages [4][14]. - The counterfeit brand generated 1.3 billion yuan in sales over two years by misleading consumers with a similar name and logo, as well as a confusing voice command [10][30]. - The court recognized the similarity in voice commands as a form of consumer confusion, which is protected under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law [13][14]. Group 2: Broader Implications of Counterfeiting - The case reflects a larger trend of counterfeit products in the consumer market, where brands often face challenges from imitators [19][20]. - Other notable cases include a 50 million yuan penalty against a manufacturer using the "Xiaomi Life" trademark and a 30 million yuan penalty for a company named "Shenzhen Xiaomi Trading Co." [17]. - The article emphasizes that the counterfeit phenomenon is widespread, affecting various industries, including household products and food [26][32]. Group 3: Economic Impact of Counterfeiting - Counterfeit products often have significantly lower production costs, leading to high profit margins for counterfeiters, which incentivizes their continued existence in the market [32][33]. - Despite legal victories, the ongoing battle against counterfeiting is costly and time-consuming for legitimate brands, as they must continuously invest in legal actions to protect their trademarks [43][47]. - The article suggests that while counterfeiting may never be completely eradicated, strong brand identity and product quality can serve as effective defenses against imitation [48][49].