马力大，就是原罪！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent controversies surrounding Xiaomi's SU7 Ultra electric vehicle, particularly focusing on the implications of high horsepower vehicles on public safety and the need for regulatory measures in the automotive industry [2][6][13]. Group 1: Recent Events and Controversies - Xiaomi's SU7 Ultra has faced significant public scrutiny following a serious traffic accident, which has led to increased regulatory attention on false advertising related to assisted driving [2][12]. - The vehicle's high performance has raised concerns about the safety of allowing such powerful cars on public roads, especially after videos of extreme speeding surfaced online [8][11]. - Xiaomi implemented an OTA software update that limited the SU7 Ultra's horsepower from 1548 to approximately 900 under normal driving conditions, aiming to enhance safety [15][17]. Group 2: Reactions and Implications - The OTA update received mixed reactions; while many praised Xiaomi for its responsible approach, some SU7 Ultra owners felt their rights were infringed upon, as they were not adequately informed prior to the changes [26][27]. - The incident highlights a broader industry issue regarding the accessibility of high-performance electric vehicles and the potential risks they pose to public safety [36][39]. - The article suggests that simply relying on manufacturers to impose horsepower limits is insufficient; there is a pressing need for regulatory frameworks to ensure safe driving practices [39][46]. Group 3: Regulatory Considerations - The article references international examples where countries have implemented regulations to restrict high horsepower vehicles, such as requiring special licenses for driving high-performance cars in Australia and Italy [47][50]. - It draws parallels between the current situation in China and Japan's past experiences with high-performance vehicles, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to prevent accidents [60][61].