LI AUTO(US:LI) 理想TOP2·2025-07-24 14:59Core Viewpoint - The article addresses the criticisms of the Li Auto i8 model, providing a counter-perspective to potential consumers and highlighting the design choices made by the company to balance various factors such as space, comfort, and aerodynamics [1]. Group 1: Criticisms of i8 - The i8 lacks a front trunk, resulting in insufficient storage space compared to the L90 model, which is seen as a disadvantage for practical use cases [2]. - The internal space of the i8 is perceived as inadequate, particularly in the third row where headroom is limited, despite the i8 being designed for optimal passenger experience [4]. - The i8's rear trunk has less depth compared to the L90, which is attributed to the company's focus on aerodynamics and passenger comfort [5]. - The i8 is considered heavier than the L90, indicating a lower level of lightweight design, which could impact energy efficiency [12]. - The design of the i8 resembles that of an MPV rather than an SUV, aimed at enhancing passenger comfort and reducing drag [13]. Group 2: Responses to Criticisms - The absence of a front trunk in the i8 is a deliberate choice to maximize the internal space for passengers, particularly in the second and third rows, while also minimizing aerodynamic drag [3]. - Although the i8 is shorter than the L90 by 6 cm, it offers more legroom in the third row, demonstrating a trade-off between overall length and passenger comfort [4]. - The i8's design prioritizes aerodynamic efficiency, which affects the height and comfort of the third-row seating, but still aims to provide a satisfactory experience [5]. - The weight of the i8 is a result of its four-wheel-drive system and larger battery, but the focus remains on delivering a better energy consumption performance [12]. - Safety features are emphasized, with the company ensuring that the i8 meets high safety standards despite its shorter front end [14]. Group 3: Technical Specifications and Performance - The i8 has a battery capacity of 97.8 kWh, while the L90 has 85.1 kWh, with the i8 achieving a CLTC range of 720 km compared to the L90's 570 km [8]. - The i8's energy consumption is lower than that of the L90, with a CLTC energy consumption of 13.6 kWh/100 km versus 14.1 kWh/100 km for the L90 [8]. - The i8's electric motor power is rated at 400 kW, which, despite being heavier than the L90, allows for competitive acceleration times [10]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The company is continuously improving its technology and may address current limitations, such as the lack of electric closing for the refrigerator, in future models [17].