特斯拉排第一，懂车帝“不懂车”？

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for serious evaluation in the automotive industry, particularly regarding autonomous driving technologies, contrasting it with the more superficial engagement seen in fan culture [1]. Group 1: Testing and Results - A large-scale test conducted by Dongche Di evaluated over 40 models from popular brands, including Tesla, in various high-risk driving scenarios [3][5]. - None of the tested vehicles achieved zero errors in both highway and urban scenarios, with a significant performance gap observed between domestic brands and Tesla [5][10]. - Tesla's Model 3 and Model X achieved the highest scores, passing 5 out of 6 scenarios, while many domestic models failed to pass any [5][10]. Group 2: Industry Reactions - The test results sparked significant public discourse, with terms like "domestic autonomous driving collective failure" trending, yet the automotive industry largely remained silent or suggested setting national standards [10][11]. - The official endorsement of the test by entities like CCTV and the Ministry of Public Security added weight to the findings, emphasizing that current systems do not possess true "autonomous driving" capabilities [13][15]. Group 3: Testing Methodology and Concerns - The test included extreme scenarios such as "disappearing front vehicles" and "nighttime construction zone avoidance," with only 14% success in the former [17][19]. - Critics raised concerns about the variability in testing conditions, questioning the fairness of comparisons between different models [22][24]. - The article suggests that the testing methodology, while revealing industry weaknesses, may not fully represent the stability of the systems under real-world conditions [24][25]. Group 4: Future Standards and Regulations - The article discusses the potential for new industry standards, such as "failure backup capability," to be established, which could address the shortcomings revealed in the tests [26][30]. - The C-NCAP plans to introduce new evaluation criteria by 2025, focusing on sensor effectiveness and system decision-making resilience [26]. Group 5: Public Perception and Media Influence - The article highlights the emotional responses from consumers and the media's role in shaping perceptions of brands like Tesla and domestic manufacturers [27][29]. - It suggests that the competitive nature of testing and the resulting media coverage can lead to polarized opinions and misunderstandings among consumers [27][39]. Group 6: Conclusion and Recommendations - The article advocates for more rigorous and transparent testing practices in the automotive industry to foster genuine improvements and consumer trust [40][41].