TENCENT(HK:00700) 程序员的那些事·2025-08-13 11:25Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by a player against Tencent seeks to make the matchmaking mechanism of "Honor of Kings" public, focusing on the factors influencing player matchups and their respective weights in different game modes, raising concerns about whether game outcomes are manipulated by the matchmaking system [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court hearing has concluded, and the next steps await notification from the court [1]. - The main dispute centers on whether the matchmaking mechanism can determine game outcomes and whether it should be made public [3]. - Tencent argues that the claim of controlling player win rates to maintain a 50% win rate is unfounded, providing examples of player win rates that vary significantly from 50% [3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Transparency - Tencent's defense cites the Consumer Rights Protection Law, stating that the law does not require the disclosure of technical details behind services, and previous cases have established boundaries for consumer rights [4]. - The court was informed that Tencent has provided information about the matchmaking mechanism through official channels, but the plaintiff believes this is insufficient and more of a promise than true transparency [4][5]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Platforms - The plaintiff argues that other large apps like Douyin and Weibo disclose their algorithms without claiming commercial secrets, questioning why Tencent does not do the same for its matchmaking mechanism [7]. - Tencent maintains that the matchmaking mechanism is a commercial secret and that its disclosure could lead to exploitation of the system, harming the gaming experience [10][11]. Group 4: Technical Aspects of Matchmaking - The matchmaking mechanism is described as a complex system that balances speed, fairness, and game quality, with the Elo rating system being used to match players of similar skill levels [12][13]. - Tencent emphasizes that the matchmaking system is a proprietary technology developed to create fair competition and that its disclosure could undermine market fairness and innovation [13].