Apple(US:AAPL) 是说芯语·2025-08-23 23:30Core Viewpoint - Apple has filed a lawsuit against former employee Chen Shi, accusing him of stealing trade secrets related to the Apple Watch and sharing them with OPPO, a direct competitor [1][6][11]. Group 1: Allegations Against Chen Shi - Chen Shi worked as a Sensor System Architect for Apple from January 2020 to June 2025, gaining access to sensitive information about the Apple Watch [2][14]. - Apple claims that Chen Shi misled the company about his reasons for leaving, stating he was returning to China to care for his elderly parents while actually accepting a position at OPPO [4][17]. - In the days leading up to his departure, Chen Shi allegedly collected sensitive documents and conducted numerous one-on-one meetings with Apple Watch team members to gather information on ongoing research and development [4][18]. Group 2: Specific Actions Taken by Chen Shi - Three days before leaving Apple, Chen Shi downloaded 63 confidential documents from a secure Box folder and transferred them to a USB drive [4][19]. - He searched online for methods to erase data from his MacBook and to check if his file access history was visible, indicating awareness of the inappropriateness of his actions [4][20]. - Chen Shi communicated with OPPO executives about his plans to gather information from Apple, explicitly stating his intention to share this information with them [4][20]. Group 3: OPPO's Involvement - OPPO is accused of encouraging Chen Shi's actions, as evidenced by a message from an OPPO executive responding positively to Chen Shi's plans to collect information from Apple [4][20]. - Chen Shi is currently leading a team at OPPO focused on developing sensor technology, which directly competes with Apple's offerings [5][11]. Group 4: Legal Actions and Implications - Apple seeks a court injunction to prevent OPPO and Chen Shi from using or disclosing its trade secrets, along with monetary damages and legal fees [6][11]. - The lawsuit highlights the potential harm to Apple's innovation commitments and the value of its trade secrets if such actions are allowed to go unpunished [6][11].