XIAOMI(HK:01810) 程序员的那些事·2026-01-04 05:06Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Xiaomi's recent live stream led by Lei Jun, addressing various controversies and criticisms regarding the company's new vehicle, the YU7, while emphasizing transparency and commitment to quality [1]. Group 1: Material and Design Controversies - Lei Jun confirmed the authenticity of the "super steel" used in the YU7, developed in collaboration with academic experts, and invited third-party testing to validate its strength [3]. - The design of the YU7's long front end was defended as a balance of aesthetics and practicality, enhancing safety and providing a spacious front trunk [5]. Group 2: Safety Features - The vehicle's wheel detachment during collisions was explained as a safety feature designed to protect passengers by redirecting impact forces [4]. - The YU7's door handle incorporates a dual mechanical design to ensure functionality even in extreme conditions, showcasing industry-leading safety redundancy [7]. Group 3: Marketing and Public Relations - Lei Jun acknowledged the issue of "small print marketing" as a common industry practice and committed to making changes to improve clarity in advertising [8]. - The company refuted rumors about preventing farmers from selling millet, emphasizing its unrelatedness to agricultural products and expressing outrage over the misinformation [9]. Group 4: Legal and Regulatory Matters - Lei Jun denied the claim of having 7,000 legal staff, asserting that the legal team is actively pursuing cases against malicious infringement [10]. - The company is taking steps to combat defamation and misinformation, with a focus on protecting its reputation and the rights of its customers [10]. Group 5: Performance Claims - Lei Jun provided evidence to support the claim of the YU7 achieving 1,300 kilometers on a single charge, clarifying that this was based on real-world testing and not exaggerated marketing [12]. - The statement regarding the vehicle's braking performance was clarified as a subjective expression rather than a technical specification, addressing concerns about misinterpretation [11].