可能被“没收”一半股权，谷歌创始人逃离硅谷

Core Viewpoint - A proposal initiated by the SEIU-UHW union in California aims to impose a one-time 5% tax on the net assets of billionaires, potentially leading to a mass exodus of wealthy individuals from Silicon Valley [4][19][46]. Group 1: Tax Proposal Details - The proposed "New Billionaire Tax" targets individuals with a net worth exceeding one billion dollars, with a retrospective effective date of January 1, 2026 [4][16][24]. - The tax is designed to raise approximately $100 billion to address funding gaps in healthcare, food assistance, and education in California [19]. - The tax structure differs from traditional income taxes, as it is based on total assets rather than income, which could lead to significant financial burdens for billionaires [24][25]. Group 2: Reactions from Billionaires - Prominent figures like Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have already begun relocating their businesses and assets out of California, with Page reportedly spending over $170 million on properties in Miami [11][13][14]. - Elon Musk has been vocal about California's high taxes and has previously moved his companies to Texas, a state known for its low tax rates [7][23]. - Other billionaires, such as Peter Thiel, have also announced moves away from California, indicating a trend of wealthy individuals seeking more favorable tax environments [17]. Group 3: Implications of the Tax - The proposal includes clauses that could lead to the confiscation of significant portions of stock holdings for billionaires, based on their voting rights and control over their companies [30][31]. - For instance, Page and Brin's holdings in Alphabet could be assessed at a much higher value due to their voting power, resulting in potential tax liabilities of up to $600 billion each [34][36]. - Critics argue that the tax could drive innovation and investment out of California, ultimately harming the state's economy and technological landscape [39][41]. Group 4: Public Sentiment and Future Actions - The proposal has sparked significant debate, with some wealthy individuals expressing indifference to the tax, while others warn of its potential negative consequences for California's economy [45]. - The initiative is not yet law and requires voter approval, with the union currently gathering signatures to qualify for a ballot [46]. - Regardless of the outcome, both those who leave and those who stay may pursue legal challenges against the tax [47].