大宗商品的“地缘安全溢价”（国金宏观陈瀚学）

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the weakening of the post-World War II rules-based international order, with countries prioritizing strategic autonomy and security, leading to increased resilience investments in energy, food, and critical minerals [4][30] - The concept of "geopolitical security premium" is highlighted as a significant pricing factor for commodities in 2026, driven by national security strategies and the need for strategic reserves [5][30] - Historical insights from the Cold War indicate that national security-driven demand can surpass long industrial cycles, significantly impacting metal prices [6][30] Group 2 - The article discusses the concentration of supply and the dependency on critical minerals, with various countries publishing lists of key minerals to enhance supply chain security [12][14] - The U.S. relies heavily on imports for many critical minerals, with 12 out of 50 minerals completely dependent on net imports, highlighting vulnerabilities in supply chains [14] - The geopolitical landscape shows that resource-rich countries, like the Democratic Republic of Congo for cobalt, are gaining leverage through export controls, reminiscent of Cold War strategies [21][30] Group 3 - Demand for critical minerals such as aluminum, graphite, and cobalt is essential for defense industries, with specific applications in weaponry and aerospace [22][23] - The article outlines the strategic importance of various metals, including titanium and tungsten, in military applications, emphasizing their role in national defense [23][30] - The current global context of geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities is expected to elevate the "security premium" on commodities, influencing market dynamics [30]