反转！影石老总霸气回应被大疆起诉，爆料很多

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between DJI and Yingshi Innovation centers around six core patent ownership issues, involving several former key DJI R&D personnel, with DJI asserting that the patents in question are职务发明 and should belong to them due to the close connection with the original work [1] Group 1: DJI's Position - DJI has filed a lawsuit in Shenzhen, claiming that the patents are职务发明 made by former employees within one year of their departure, thus asserting ownership [1] - DJI's strong stance indicates that they believe the patents are highly linked to their original work and should rightfully belong to them [1] - The lawsuit highlights concerns over Yingshi's patent application practices, including the alleged concealment of inventors in domestic applications while disclosing them in international PCT applications, raising questions about their intent [1] Group 2: Yingshi's Response - Yingshi's founder, Liu Jingkang, firmly stated that all involved patents are original creations developed internally by Yingshi, with no connection to DJI [2] - Liu emphasized that the practice of hiding inventors is a common industry practice aimed at protecting technical talent from aggressive recruitment, not a tactic against DJI [2] - He also expressed understanding of DJI's competitive frustrations, suggesting that Yingshi has not initiated patent wars and has maintained restraint despite DJI's encroachment on their market [3] Group 3: Market Context - The dispute is set against a backdrop of intense competition, with Yingshi launching panoramic drones that encroach on DJI's territory, while DJI counters with budget-friendly panoramic cameras targeting Yingshi's market base [5] - The escalating market competition has led to a situation where patent disputes are becoming a critical strategy for both companies [5]