Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Coupang, Inc. securities between August 6, 2025, and December 16, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Coupang securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file with the Court by February 17, 2026 [3] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Coupang made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose inadequate cybersecurity protocols that allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer information for nearly six months [5] - It is claimed that this breach heightened the risk of regulatory and legal scrutiny, and the company did not report the breach in compliance with SEC reporting rules [5] - As a result of these actions, the public statements made by Coupang were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased CarMax, Inc. securities between June 20, 2025, and November 5, 2025, of the January 2, 2026, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a securities class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought CarMax securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 2, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that CarMax's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's growth prospects, which were overstated due to temporary market conditions [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Synopsys, Inc. securities between December 4, 2024, and September 9, 2025, of the December 30, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Synopsys securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by December 30, 2025 [2] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [5] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Synopsys' defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [4] - Specific allegations include the negative impact of Synopsys' focus on artificial intelligence customers on its Design IP business and the misleading nature of positive statements made by the defendants [4] - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages as a result [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of StubHub Holdings, Inc. common stock about the January 23, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline related to a class action lawsuit following the company's September 2025 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by January 23, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, omitting critical information about changes in payment timing to vendors and its adverse impact on free cash flow [5]. - It is claimed that these omissions led to materially misleading reports on StubHub's free cash flow and positive statements about the company's business and prospects [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Jayud Global Logistics Ltd. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Jayud securities between April 21, 2023, and April 30, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 20, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in this area [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in terms of settlements recovered for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, Jayud made materially false and misleading statements, failed to disclose a fraudulent stock promotion scheme, and omitted critical information regarding share dumping and artificial trading activity [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Klarna Group plc securities related to its September 2025 IPO, alleging misleading statements in the Registration Statement [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the Registration Statement contained false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which was known or should have been known by the defendants [5]. - Investors are entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Participation Information - Interested parties can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by February 20, 2026, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased CarMax, Inc. securities between June 20, 2025, and November 5, 2025, about the January 2, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought CarMax securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that CarMax's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's growth prospects, which were overstated due to temporary market conditions [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has initiated a class action lawsuit against SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae) for allegedly misleading investors about its business operations during a specific period in 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that SLM Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding its business, specifically that it was experiencing a significant increase in early-stage delinquencies [3]. - It is alleged that SLM overstated the effectiveness of its loss mitigation and loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of its private education loan delinquency rates [3]. - The misleading public statements created a materially false impression about SLM's business operations and prospects, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Investors who wish to participate in the class action must file motions to serve as lead plaintiffs by February 17, 2026 [4]. - A lead plaintiff represents other class members in directing the litigation, but participation is not required to be eligible for recovery [4]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm Overview - Rosen Law Firm specializes in shareholder rights litigation and has a track record of recovering over $1 billion for shareholders [6]. - The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses unless they recover losses [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has initiated a class action lawsuit against F5, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors about its business operations and financial outlook during the specified class period from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that F5, Inc. misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [3]. - It is alleged that F5's optimistic statements regarding its security capabilities were misleading, as the company was experiencing a significant security incident that jeopardized both client security and F5's future prospects [3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs must file motions with the court by February 17, 2026, and can choose to remain absent class members without participating in the case [4]. - The representation in this lawsuit is on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders will not incur any fees or expenses unless there is a recovery [5]. Group 3: About Rosen Law Firm - Rosen Law Firm is recognized for its commitment to shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $1 billion for shareholders since its inception [6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Perrigo Company plc securities between February 27, 2023, and November 4, 2025, of the January 16, 2026, deadline to serve as lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Perrigo securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2][5]. - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is January 16, 2026, with the lead plaintiff acting on behalf of other class members [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [3]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been ranked highly for its performance in securities class action settlements [3]. - The firm has been recognized for its expertise, with founding partner Laurence Rosen named a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business, including issues related to underinvestment, necessary capital expenditures, and manufacturing deficiencies [4]. - As a result of these issues, Perrigo's financial results, including earnings and cash flow, were overstated, leading to misleading statements about the company's business prospects [4]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true details became known, investors suffered damages [4].