Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Shareholders Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationLOS ANGELES, Feb. 18, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- [The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz] announces that investors with losses related to Oracle Corporation ("Oracle" or the "Company") (NYSE: [ORCL]) have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit.IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN ORACLE CORPORATION (ORCL), CLICK [HERE] BEFORE APRIL 6, 2026 (THE ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Richtech Robotics Inc. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Richtech Robotics securities between January 27, 2026, and January 29, 2026, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by April 3, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that Richtech made false claims about its relationship with Microsoft, which misled investors regarding the company's business and prospects [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. for securities fraud, alleging that the company made false statements and failed to disclose material issues regarding its financial statements and internal controls during the class period from August 7, 2024, to February 9, 2026 [1][1][1] Summary by Relevant Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Kyndryl's financial statements were materially misstated and that the company lacked adequate internal controls, which led to an inability to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 [1][1][1] - It is alleged that the misleading statements about Kyndryl's business operations and prospects caused investors to suffer damages when the true details became public [1][1][1] Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased Kyndryl securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1][1][1] - To join the class action, investors can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [1][1][1] Law Firm Background - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [1][1][1] - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements and has a history of representing investors globally [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against F5, Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the Class Period from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 17, 2026 [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit, titled Smith v. F5, Inc., claims that F5 and its executives misrepresented the company's revenue outlook and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [1] - Allegations include that F5 was experiencing a significant security incident that jeopardized client security and the company's future prospects [1] - On October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed a security breach involving a nation-state threat actor, leading to a nearly 14% drop in stock price over two trading days [1] Group 2: Financial Impact - Following the security breach, F5 reported fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results that fell significantly below market growth expectations for fiscal 2026, attributing this to the breach and announcing expected reductions in sales and renewals [1] - The stock price fell nearly 11% over two trading days after the announcement of the disappointing fiscal results [1] Group 3: Legal Process - Investors who purchased F5 securities during the Class Period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff, with the lead plaintiff representing the interests of all class members [1] - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [1] Group 4: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1] - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [1]

Core Viewpoint - Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) experienced a significant share price decline of over 27% following the announcement of improper accounting practices, leading to an investigation into potential misleading statements made to investors [1] Financial Reporting Issues - Hub Group filed a report with the SEC indicating that its quarterly reports from March 31, 2025, should no longer be relied upon due to understated "purchased transportation costs and accounts payable" for the first nine months of 2025 [1] - The specific quarterly reports affected include those for the periods ending March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2025 [1] Market Reaction - Following the announcement, Hub Group's share price fell by as much as $14.16, resulting in a loss of over $800 million in market capitalization in a single day [1] Investigation Details - Hagens Berman, a national shareholder rights law firm, has initiated an investigation to determine if Hub Group intentionally misled investors regarding its financial statements and internal controls [1] - The firm is assessing whether fiscal years 2023 and 2024 may also be impacted by the accounting issues [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against Charming Medical Limited (MCTA) for securities fraud, with a deadline for shareholders to file a lead plaintiff motion by February 17, 2026 [1] - The lawsuit claims that during the class period from October 10, 2025, to November 12, 2025, the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations [1] - The SEC halted trading of Charming securities on November 11, 2025, due to potential manipulation through social media recommendations aimed at artificially inflating the stock price [1] Group 2 - Allegations in the lawsuit include that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate the dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign, and that the company failed to disclose material adverse facts [1] - The complaint asserts that the company's public statements omitted any mention of false rumors and artificial trading activity that influenced the stock price [1] - Shareholders who acquired Charming securities during the class period are encouraged to participate in the lawsuit to recover losses under federal securities laws [1]

Core Viewpoint - SLM Corporation is facing a federal securities class action due to allegations of making false and misleading statements regarding its financial health, particularly concerning increasing early-stage delinquencies and the effectiveness of its loss mitigation programs [1] Group 1: Allegations Against SLM Corporation - The complaint alleges that SLM and its executives violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose a significant increase in early-stage delinquencies [1] - Defendants are accused of overstating the effectiveness of SLM's loss mitigation and loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of the Company's PEL delinquency rates [1] - Public statements made by the defendants created a materially false and misleading impression regarding SLM's business operations and prospects [1] Group 2: Impact of TD Cowen's Report - On August 14, 2025, TD Cowen reported that July 2025 delinquencies increased by 49 basis points month-over-month, which was worse than the seasonal increase of 10 basis points [1] - The report highlighted a 45 basis point increase in early-stage delinquencies, contradicting previous assurances from SLM's executives that delinquency rates were following normal seasonal trends [1] - Following the report, SLM's stock price dropped by $2.67 per share, or 8.09%, closing at $30.32 per share on August 15, 2025 [1]

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been initiated against China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (CLEUF) for misleading investors during a specific class period, leading to significant financial losses for shareholders [1]. Group 1: Company Overview - China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (CLEUF) is facing legal action due to allegations of securities fraud, specifically related to undisclosed shares and misleading information provided to investors [1]. - The company reported 240 million previously undisclosed exchanged shares on January 29, 2025, resulting in a drastic stock price drop from $7.75 to $0.148 per share, marking a 98.1% loss [1]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The class action lawsuit claims that during the class period from January 22, 2025, to January 30, 2025, the defendants made materially false statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's operations and prospects [1]. - Investors have until March 31, 2026, to file a lead plaintiff motion in this class action lawsuit [1].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Richtech Robotics Inc. for the period between January 27, 2026, and January 29, 2026, alleging false and misleading statements by the company [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that Richtech Robotics falsely stated it had a collaborative relationship with Microsoft, which it did not have, leading to materially false and misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [5]. - Investors who purchased Richtech Robotics securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Participation Information - Interested parties can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly. A lead plaintiff must move the court by April 3, 2026 [3][6]. - It is noted that no class has been certified yet, and investors can choose to remain absent or select their own counsel [7]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Richtech Robotics Inc. for the period between January 27, 2026, and January 29, 2026, alleging false and misleading statements by the company [1][5]. Summary by Sections Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is aimed at investors who purchased Richtech Robotics securities during the specified Class Period and may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file a motion with the court by April 3, 2026 [1][3]. Allegations Against Richtech Robotics - The lawsuit claims that Richtech Robotics made false statements regarding its relationship with Microsoft, asserting a collaborative and commercial relationship that did not exist [5]. - As a result of these misleading statements, the lawsuit contends that the company's business operations and prospects were misrepresented, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes its experience and success in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].