What Happened? LOS ANGELES, July 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming August 11, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Rocket" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: RCKT) securities between February 27, 2025 and May 26, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR ROCKET INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIA ...

Core Viewpoint - 3D Systems Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to significant financial losses and misleading statements made by the company regarding its business performance and outlook during the Class Period from August 13, 2024, to May 12, 2025 [1][5]. Financial Performance - On March 26, 2025, 3D Systems reported its Q4 and full-year 2024 results, missing consensus estimates for non-GAAP earnings-per-share and sales revenue, attributing the shortfall to lower hardware systems sales caused by macroeconomic factors [2]. - The company experienced a revenue reduction of $9 million in Q4 due to changes in accounting estimates related to its Regenerative Medicine program [2]. - Following this announcement, the stock price dropped by $0.57, or 21%, closing at $2.15 per share on March 27, 2025 [2]. - On May 12, 2025, 3D Systems released its Q1 2025 results, again missing estimates, primarily due to a decline in material sales linked to inventory management issues in its Healthcare Solutions segment [3]. - The company withdrew its full-year 2025 outlook, citing ongoing softness in customer capital spending and macroeconomic uncertainty [3]. - The stock price fell further by $0.68, or 26.6%, closing at $1.87 per share on May 13, 2025 [4]. Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit alleges that 3D Systems made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about its business and prospects during the Class Period [5]. - Specific allegations include the understatement of the impact of weakened customer spending and the overstatement of the company's resilience in challenging conditions [5]. - The lawsuit claims that the updated milestone criteria in the United Partnership negatively affected the revenue from the Regenerative Medicine Program [5].

在经历了十多年来欧洲IPO上半年最慢的时期后，交易员们寄希望于今年晚些时候几笔大型交易能够重 燃市场。据彭博社汇编的数据，到2025年为止，该地区的IPO已筹集约55.2亿美元，较上年下降60%。 美国总统特朗普的关税引发的动荡导致市场冻结数周，虽然一些公司此后开始发行股票，但也有一些公 司推迟或取消了首次公开募股。 ...

马斯克旗下初创公司xAI Corp.债券价格下跌，马斯克与美国总统特朗普围绕税收立法草案的口水战让 投资者感到忧心忡忡。 据Trace数据，2030年到期的12.5%公司债下跌1.50美分，美东时间12:19报99.50美分。 彭博资讯科技分析师Mandeep Singh表示："特朗普与马斯克划清界限，加上xAI未被考虑与苹果进行第 三方LLM集成，例如Anthropic或OpenAI，这可能会对xAI在私人市场的债券造成压力。" ...

以色列中部多地响起防空警报 以军称拦截也门方向导弹 智通财经7月2日电，据央视新闻报道，当地时间7月1日晚，以色列中部多地响起防空警报。以色列国防 军发表声明称，监测到一枚导弹从也门发射向以色列，已成功对该导弹进行拦截。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Investors are increasingly seeking growth stocks that demonstrate above-average growth potential, with Federal Signal (FSS) identified as a strong candidate due to its favorable growth metrics and Zacks Rank [2][10]. Group 1: Earnings Growth - Federal Signal has a historical EPS growth rate of 17.8%, with projected EPS growth of 14.7% for the current year, significantly outperforming the industry average of 5.4% [5][4]. Group 2: Cash Flow Growth - The company exhibits a year-over-year cash flow growth of 24.6%, which is substantially higher than the industry average of -9.5% [6]. Additionally, its annualized cash flow growth rate over the past 3-5 years stands at 12.2%, compared to the industry average of 4.6% [7]. Group 3: Earnings Estimate Revisions - There has been a positive trend in earnings estimate revisions for Federal Signal, with the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year increasing by 0.1% over the past month [8]. This trend is correlated with potential near-term stock price movements [8]. Group 4: Overall Assessment - Federal Signal has achieved a Growth Score of B and a Zacks Rank of 2, indicating it is a solid choice for growth investors and a potential outperformer in the market [10].

Core Viewpoint - Growth stocks are appealing due to their potential for above-average financial growth, but identifying strong candidates involves significant challenges and risks [1] Group 1: Company Overview - Quanta Services (PWR) is currently highlighted as a recommended growth stock, benefiting from a favorable Growth Score and a top Zacks Rank [2] - The company operates as a specialty contractor for utility and energy sectors, making it a strong growth pick [3] Group 2: Earnings Growth - Quanta Services has a historical EPS growth rate of 23.2%, with projected EPS growth of 15.2% for the current year, surpassing the industry average of 13.9% [4] Group 3: Cash Flow Growth - The year-over-year cash flow growth for Quanta Services stands at 24.6%, significantly higher than the industry average of 14.4% [5] - The company's annualized cash flow growth rate over the past 3-5 years is 21.9%, compared to the industry average of 6.2% [6] Group 4: Earnings Estimate Revisions - There have been upward revisions in current-year earnings estimates for Quanta Services, with the Zacks Consensus Estimate increasing by 0.1% over the past month [8] Group 5: Investment Positioning - Quanta Services has achieved a Growth Score of B and a Zacks Rank 2, indicating strong potential for outperformance in the growth stock category [9]

Core Viewpoint - Growth investors are increasingly focused on identifying stocks with above-average financial growth, which can lead to solid returns, but finding such stocks is challenging due to their inherent risks and volatility [1] Group 1: Company Overview - McKesson is identified as a promising growth stock, supported by a favorable Growth Score and a top Zacks Rank [2] - The company has a historical EPS growth rate of 16%, with projected EPS growth of 12.6% this year, significantly outperforming the industry average of 1.3% [5] - McKesson's sales are expected to grow by 13% this year, compared to the industry average of 1.1% [7] Group 2: Key Metrics - The asset utilization ratio for McKesson is 4.95, indicating that the company generates $4.95 in sales for every dollar in assets, which is substantially higher than the industry average of 0.72 [6] - The current-year earnings estimates for McKesson have been revised upward, with the Zacks Consensus Estimate increasing by 0.1% over the past month [9] Group 3: Investment Potential - McKesson has achieved a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy) and a Growth Score of A, indicating its potential as an outperformer and a solid choice for growth investors [11]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Reddit, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the lawsuit is from October 29, 2024, to May 20, 2025, and the lead plaintiff deadline is August 18, 2025 [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has been ranked highly for its success in this area [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements regarding user engagement and advertising revenues due to changes in Google Search's algorithm [4]. - It is claimed that these algorithm changes led to a significant reduction in traffic to Reddit, which the defendants were aware of but failed to disclose [4]. - The lawsuit asserts that the true impact of these changes was not communicated to investors, resulting in damages when the information became public [4].

Core Insights - ServiceNow (NOW) and Tyler Technologies (TYL) are key players in the cloud-based enterprise software market, focusing on different customer segments [1] - The digital transformation market is projected to reach approximately $4 trillion by 2027, with a CAGR of 16.2% from 2022 to 2027, benefiting both companies [2] ServiceNow Highlights - ServiceNow is experiencing increased adoption of its workflows, with 72 transactions exceeding $1 million in net new annual contract value (ACV) by Q1 2025 [3] - The company reported a 20% year-over-year growth in customers with over $5 million in ACV, totaling 508 customers [3] - The introduction of the Core Business Suite in May 2025 aims to enhance efficiency across various business operations [4] - ServiceNow's AI-driven solutions in Security and Risk are enhancing enterprise security and operational efficiency [5] - Expected subscription revenues for Q2 are between $3.03 billion and $3.035 billion, reflecting a year-over-year increase of 19% to 19.5% [6] Tyler Technologies Highlights - Tyler Technologies provides essential software for the public sector, focusing on stable revenue sources like property taxes [7] - The transition from outdated systems to cloud-based solutions is expected to increase Tyler's recurring revenues, which currently make up about 80% of total revenues [8] - Tyler has made 14 acquisitions in the last five years, with the acquisition of Computing System Innovations (CSI) enhancing its document processing capabilities [9][10] - The company projects full-year 2025 revenues between $2.31 billion and $2.35 billion, indicating an 8.94% year-over-year growth [11] Earnings and Valuation - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ServiceNow's 2025 earnings is $16.54 per share, reflecting an 18.82% increase from fiscal 2024 [12] - Tyler's earnings estimate for 2025 has declined to $11.13 per share, suggesting a 16.54% growth over 2024 [12] - Both companies have consistently beaten earnings estimates, with ServiceNow showing a higher average surprise of 6.61% compared to Tyler's 3.82% [13] - Year-to-date, ServiceNow shares have declined by 4.4%, while Tyler shares have increased by 1.9% [14] - In terms of valuation, both companies are considered overvalued, with Tyler trading at a forward Price/Sales ratio of 10.48X, lower than ServiceNow's 14.99X [17] Conclusion - Both ServiceNow and Tyler Technologies are positioned to benefit from the demand for digital transformation despite macroeconomic challenges [19] - ServiceNow holds a competitive advantage with a stronger portfolio and partner base, while Tyler faces challenges from competition and economic conditions [19]