Business Focus - Circle's core business has traditionally revolved around USDC and AUM-based revenues [1] - Circle is now strategically expanding into transaction-based revenues through the CCTP bridge [1] Transaction Volume - CCTP transfer volume reached an all-time high in Q4 2025 (ongoing) [1]

RT OnRe (@onrefinance)Another AUM ATH.OnRe crosses $60M AUM with 40% growth in just the last two weeks.Momentum is compounding around @solana's most utilized yield asset.Slowly, then all at once. ...

Core Insights - The article compares two leading short-term bond ETFs: Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB), highlighting their differences in cost, portfolio concentration, and sector exposure [2][3] Cost and Size Comparison - BSV has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to ISTB's 0.06%, making it more cost-effective for investors [4][5] - BSV has significantly higher assets under management (AUM) at $65.6 billion, while ISTB has $4.7 billion [4][10] - Both funds have the same 1-year return of 1.6%, but ISTB offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 4.1% compared to BSV's 3.8% [4][5] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over a five-year period, BSV experienced a max drawdown of 8.50%, while ISTB had a max drawdown of 9.33% [6] - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years is $951 for BSV and $945 for ISTB, indicating a marginally better performance for BSV [6] Portfolio Composition - BSV holds a concentrated portfolio of just 30 bonds, with a significant focus on communication services (69%) [7] - ISTB, in contrast, has a diversified portfolio with nearly 7,000 bonds, primarily in utilities (99%) [8] - BSV's largest positions include Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America, while ISTB's top holdings are U.S. Treasury notes [7][8] Investor Implications - BSV is more suitable for cost-conscious investors seeking high liquidity due to its lower fees and larger AUM [10] - ISTB offers broader diversification and a better dividend yield, making it appealing for investors looking for stability and income [11]

Circle’s business has historically been defined by USDC, and AUM-based revenues.With the CCTP bridge, @circle is making a push into transaction-based revenues.Quarterly CCTP transfer volume is up by 6.3x YoY, reaching $28.9 billion in Q3 '25. https://t.co/qCybuOgHsA ...

Core Insights - The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is tech-heavy and has shown strong recent performance, while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) offers broader diversification, lower fees, and a higher yield [1][2] Cost Comparison - QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while VOO has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% [3][4] - VOO also offers a higher dividend yield of 1.1% compared to QQQ's 0.5% [3][4] Performance Metrics - As of November 28, 2025, QQQ has a 1-year return of 21.5%, outperforming VOO's 13.5% [3] - Over five years, QQQ's maximum drawdown is -35.12%, compared to VOO's -24.52% [5][10] - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years is $2,067 for QQQ and $1,889 for VOO [5] Composition and Sector Exposure - VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index with 505 companies, allocating 36% to technology, 13% to financial services, and 11% to consumer cyclicals [6][7] - QQQ is more concentrated, with 54% in technology, 17% in communication services, and 13% in consumer cyclicals [7] - Major holdings for both ETFs include NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, but QQQ has slightly higher individual weights in these stocks [7] Investment Appeal - VOO is suitable for investors seeking broad, low-cost coverage of the U.S. large-cap universe, while QQQ appeals to those looking for concentrated growth in technology [6][10] - Both ETFs are considered excellent choices for investment portfolios, despite their low dividend yields [11]

RT SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor)🚨NEWS: Solana treasury company @Solmate has signed a non-binding agreement to buy @Rockaway_X, creating an institutional crypto giant with over $2B in combined AUM and third-party stake. RockawayX’s infra, liquidity, and asset-management units will move under Solmate. https://t.co/VhdacAmrWJ ...

Core Viewpoint - Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) has shown a positive performance with a 5.9% increase in shares since the last earnings report, outperforming the S&P 500, raising questions about the sustainability of this trend leading up to the next earnings release [1][2]. Financial Performance - Q3 2025 economic earnings were reported at $6.10 per share, exceeding the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5.83, and reflecting a 26.6% increase year-over-year [3]. - Economic net income reached $179.7 million, up 17.3% from the previous year, surpassing the estimate of $166.8 million [4]. - Total revenues for the quarter increased by 2.2% year-over-year to $528 million, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $521.1 million [5]. - Adjusted EBITDA was reported at $250.9 million, a 17.2% increase, exceeding the projected $233.3 million [5]. Assets Under Management (AUM) - As of September 30, 2025, total AUM was $803.6 billion, reflecting a 10.3% increase, surpassing the estimate of $780.8 billion [6]. - Average AUM totaled $786.9 billion, up 10.6% year-over-year, with net client cash outflows of $2.8 billion during the quarter [6]. Capital and Liquidity - The company had $476.1 million in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2025, down from $950 million at the end of 2024 [7]. - Total debt decreased to $2.37 billion from $2.62 billion as of December 31, 2024, while stockholders' equity slightly decreased to $3.34 billion [7]. Share Repurchase Activity - During Q3, Affiliated Managers repurchased shares worth $77 million [8]. Future Outlook - Management anticipates adjusted EBITDA in the range of $325-$370 million for Q4 2025, based on current AUM levels and expected net performance fees of $75-$120 million [9]. - Economic net income (controlling interest) is projected between $234-$267 million, with economic EPS expected to range from $8.10 to $9.26 [11]. Estimate Revisions - There has been an upward trend in estimates revisions, with the consensus estimate shifting by 7.88% in the past month [12]. Investment Strategy Scores - Affiliated Managers has an average Growth Score of C, a Momentum Score of A, and a Value Score of B, resulting in an aggregate VGM Score of A [13]. Industry Context - Affiliated Managers operates within the Zacks Financial - Investment Management industry, where competitor Invesco reported a 4.3% gain over the past month and revenues of $1.19 billion, reflecting a year-over-year change of +7.4% [15].

🏦⛓️ The market cap (AUM) of the @SuperstateInc USCC fund is at an all-time high of ~$623.1M, up ~650% since the start of the year. https://t.co/uskeYFFOG5 ...

breakdown view:https://t.co/EsyC1Sg6vtToken Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal):🏦🇺🇸 The AUM of tokenized money market funds is at an all-time high of ~$8.4 billion, up ~60x since the start of 2024.The @SecScottBessent playbook in action 👇 https://t.co/ZS6BFrbNnP ...

Market Trends - Tokenized money market funds' AUM reaches an all-time high of approximately $8.4 billion [1] - The AUM of tokenized money market funds has increased by about 6000% since the beginning of 2024 [1] Fund Composition - The AUM includes TMMFs backed by U.S Treasury Bills [1] Key Players - Securitize tokenizes BUIDL and VBILL [1]