breakdown view:https://t.co/EsyC1Sg6vtToken Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal):🏦🇺🇸 The AUM of tokenized money market funds is at an all-time high of ~$8.4 billion, up ~60x since the start of 2024.The @SecScottBessent playbook in action 👇 https://t.co/ZS6BFrbNnP ...

🏦🇺🇸 The AUM of tokenized money market funds is at an all-time high of ~$8.4 billion, up ~60x since the start of 2024.Includes TMMFs backed by U.S. T-Bills.Note: BUIDL and VBILL are tokenized by @Securitize. https://t.co/za37GH8Sdt ...

RT Token Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal)🏦🇺🇸 The AUM of tokenized money market funds is at an all-time high of ~$8.4 billion, up ~60x since the start of 2024.The @SecScottBessent playbook in action 👇 https://t.co/ZS6BFrbNnP ...

🏦🇺🇸 The AUM of tokenized money market funds is at an all-time high of ~$8.4 billion, up ~60x since the start of 2024.The @SecScottBessent playbook in action 👇 https://t.co/ZS6BFrbNnP ...

RT Token Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal)The AUM for VanEck's VBILL is closing in on $100M.The VBILL product is tokenized by Securitize, and is available on Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and Avalanche. https://t.co/eXBCn2HcEq ...

RT Carlos Domingo (@carlosdomingo)About to get another asset with over $100M AUM, and that will be our 7th one, let's go!! ...

Core Insights - SPXL and QLD are leveraged ETFs with different targets: SPXL aims for triple the daily performance of the S&P 500, while QLD seeks double the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100, resulting in distinct sector exposures and risk profiles [1][2]. ETF Overview - SPXL, issued by Direxion, has an expense ratio of 0.87%, a one-year return of 35.6%, a dividend yield of 0.8%, and assets under management (AUM) of $5.9 billion. Its beta is 3.05, indicating higher volatility compared to the S&P 500 [3]. - QLD, issued by ProShares, has an expense ratio of 0.95%, a one-year return of 44.6%, a dividend yield of 0.2%, and AUM of $9.9 billion. Its beta is 2.22, reflecting lower volatility than SPXL [3]. Performance Metrics - Over five years, a $1,000 investment in SPXL would grow to $4,717, while the same investment in QLD would grow to $3,434. Both funds experienced a maximum drawdown of approximately 63% [4]. - SPXL has outperformed QLD over a longer timeframe, with a five-year total return of 366% (CAGR of 36.1%) compared to QLD's 252% (CAGR of 28.6%). Both funds significantly outperformed the S&P 500, which had a total return of 123% (CAGR of 17.4%) over the same period [8]. Sector Exposure - QLD's portfolio is heavily weighted towards technology (54%), followed by communication services (16%) and consumer cyclical (13%). It holds 121 companies, with top positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [5]. - SPXL spreads its assets across 516 holdings, with its largest positions mirroring the S&P 500, but with smaller weights in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft compared to QLD [5]. Investment Considerations - Both SPXL and QLD provide leveraged exposure to major indexes, but they come with high fees and extreme volatility. The daily leverage reset mechanism can impact long-term returns if held beyond a single day [9].

🔺⛓️ ICYMI: The AUM of @BlackRock BUIDL on @avax is up by ~10x in the past two weeks. https://t.co/w2sp4KKWsv ...

RT Jon Ma (@jonbma)Solana will trade like oil & gas until Wall Street values blockchains using fundamentalsSolana can become VERY profitable networks as finance moves onchain -- tokenization is projected to grow from $600B to $9T in 2030.Here's a model I built out for Solana with key drivers:- Asset Under Manage (~TVL) as a % of Tokenization- Global Transfer Volume as a Velocity Multiple on AUM- Revenue as a % of Global Transfer Volume- Inflation RateIf you believe $SOL will1. Take 5% of Tokenization market ...

RT Hunter Horsley (@HHorsley)~$46,000,000 inflow into $BSOL yesterday.SOL purchased. AUM now ~$330M.Have seen wealth managers, institutional asset managers, and individuals buying. A broad mix.Grateful to investors for entrusting Bitwise to steward their assets.Onward — ...