Core Viewpoint - A federal judge ruled that Exxon Mobil can proceed with its defamation lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta, rejecting Bonta's claim of immunity related to his criticisms of Exxon's recycling initiatives [1]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The judge, Michael Truncale, dismissed Bonta's immunity claim, stating that whether Bonta's criticisms were made in good faith is a factual question to be determined later [1]. - Related claims against environmental groups were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction [1]. - Exxon filed the lawsuit against Bonta in January 2025, following California's lawsuit accusing Exxon of misleading the public about recycling [1]. Group 2: Statements and Allegations - Exxon objected to 14 statements made by Bonta, including claims that Exxon's recycling plan was "not based on truth" and that only 5% of U.S. plastic waste is recycled [1]. - The judge indicated that it would not be unfair to review certain statements for possible defamation, as they were directly related to Exxon and based on Texas sources [1]. - Bonta's statements included claims about plastic waste accumulation in Houston and the environmental impact of unrecycled plastics [1]. Group 3: Context and Implications - Exxon has shown a willingness to confront environmental critics who argue that its operations contribute to climate change and greenhouse gas emissions [1]. - The case highlights the ongoing tension between major oil companies and environmental advocates regarding sustainability and corporate responsibility [1].

President Trump is suing the BBC for10 billion. The case, a misleading documentary edit that appeared to show him calling for violence on the US capital by his supporters on January the 6th, 2021. The suit was filed in Trump's home state of Florida and alleges one count of defamation and one count violating a Florida unfair trade practices law.It also tests UK Prime Minister Kier Starmmer's attempts at warmer relations with Washington, a strategy that's designed to shield the UK from the sharp end of Trump' ...

Core Viewpoint - Music Licensing, Inc. and its subsidiary Pro Music Rights are considering legal action against Representative Scott Fitzgerald and legacy performing rights organizations for allegedly false and defamatory statements aimed at suppressing independent competition in the U.S. music licensing market [1][2][5] Group 1: Legal Actions and Responses - Pro Music Rights and Music Licensing, Inc. reject a recent Congressional letter, claiming it contains politically motivated and factually inaccurate assertions about their business and commitment to independent music creators [2] - The company is exploring all available legal remedies in response to what it perceives as attacks on the integrity of lawfully operated businesses [5] - Chairman Jake P. Noch is evaluating legal action against Representative Fitzgerald for statements he believes are anti-Semitic and damaging to his reputation [9][10] Group 2: Market Integrity and Competition - The company argues that Fitzgerald's request for a Federal Trade Commission investigation is based on selective claims from industry players threatened by PMR's market presence [3] - PMR maintains that it has consistently disclosed its licensing practices and market share, countering claims of deceptive practices [4] - The MIC Coalition, which includes various corporate interests, is accused of advocating for reduced music licensing costs while undermining fair compensation for creators [7] Group 3: Commitment to Independent Creators - PMR positions itself as the only PRO that disrupts the status quo and advocates for fair treatment of historically marginalized creators [8] - The company emphasizes the importance of fair engagement with independent songwriters and rightsholders, criticizing the portrayal of their works as "worthless" [11] - Music Licensing, Inc. and Pro Music Rights are committed to defending independent creators and ensuring fair compensation through advocacy and litigation [12] Group 4: Company Overview and Market Position - Music Licensing, Inc. is recognized as the fifth public performance rights organization in the U.S. and licenses music to major platforms such as TikTok and iHeartMedia [13] - Pro Music Rights holds an estimated 7.4% market share in the U.S., representing over 2.5 million works by notable artists [14] - The company also holds royalty interests in a vast portfolio of musical works by globally renowned artists [15]

Core Viewpoint - Music Licensing, Inc. and its subsidiary Pro Music Rights are considering legal action against Representative Scott Fitzgerald and legacy performing rights organizations for allegedly false and defamatory statements aimed at suppressing independent competition in the U.S. music licensing market [1][2][5]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Responses - Pro Music Rights and Music Licensing, Inc. reject a recent Congressional letter, claiming it contains politically motivated and factually inaccurate assertions about their business and commitment to independent music creators [2]. - The company believes that Representative Fitzgerald's request for a Federal Trade Commission investigation is based on selective claims from industry players threatened by PMR's market presence [3]. - PMR is exploring legal remedies against Fitzgerald for defamation and considering antitrust litigation against the MIC Coalition and incumbent PROs for efforts to suppress competition [9]. Group 2: Market Position and Practices - PMR holds an estimated 7.4% market share in the U.S., representing over 2.5 million works from notable artists [14]. - The company has consistently disclosed its licensing practices and market share in official filings, countering claims of deceptive practices [4]. - PMR advocates for fair treatment of historically marginalized creators, emphasizing its disruptive impact on the traditional PRO landscape [8]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Criticism - The MIC Coalition, which includes various trade associations, has historically advocated for reduced music licensing costs, often at the expense of fair compensation for creators [7]. - Incumbent PROs have previously sought antitrust relief when their market power was scrutinized, yet now leverage political influence to maintain dominance [6]. - The scrutiny faced by PMR highlights the resistance from established players to its creator-centric business model [8]. Group 4: Commitment to Creators - PMR emphasizes its commitment to defending independent creators and ensuring fair compensation through advocacy and litigation [12]. - The company calls for direct engagement with independent songwriters and rightsholders to address misrepresentations and uphold copyright integrity [11]. - Chairman Jake P. Noch has faced personal attacks, which he categorically rejects, asserting that no authority has found misconduct by him or PMR [10].

TO THE STORY WEEKNIGHTS ON NBC NEWS NOW. >> MEGAN THEE STALLION IS BACK IN COURT, THIS TIME TO TESTIFY AGAINST A BLOGGER WHO SHE SAYS HAS BEEN HARASSING HER FOR YEARS SINCE SHE WAS SHOT BY FELLOW ARTIST TORY LANEZ. THE RAPPER IS SUING INFLUENCER MILAGRO GRAMS, WHOSE REAL NAME IS MILAGRO COOPER, FOR DEFAMATION, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THIS LAST ONE HERE FOR CIRCULATING AN EXPLICIT DEEPFAKE VIDEO OF HER ONLINE MEGAN THEE STALLION, WHOSE REAL NAME IS MEGAN PETE, TOOK JURORS BACK TO THE DAY OF THAT JULY 2020.SHO ...

Several high-profile people have recently complained of being defamed by a chatbot. Such lawsuits could become a big headache for AI companies, which are already caught in legal tussles over copyright and other grievances https://t.co/Ais6Pb4bwo ...

Companies from Google and Meta to OpenAI are getting sued for defamation https://t.co/wugfSKaV63 ...

Legal Proceedings - Trump is requesting the Supreme Court to overturn the $5 million verdict in the Eugene Carol case [1] - The case involves allegations of sexual abuse and defamation [1] - Trump's lawyers argue the case lacks eyewitness or video evidence [1]

🇺🇸 LATEST: Sen. Warren's lawyers responded to CZ's defamation threat, saying any claim would be "without merit", citing her post was based on public record. https://t.co/XaLdQg5rnv ...

Elizabeth Warren rebuffs defamation allegations from Changpeng Zhao through lawyer: report https://t.co/ACch6TgZd6 ...