Filing underscores Life360’s commitment to confronting weak or coercive claims through direct legal challengesSAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Life360 (Nasdaq: LIF; ASX: 360), the leading family connection and safety company, today announced that it has filed a new complaint in the District of Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that GoCodes, Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 8,973,813 is invalid. Earlier this year, GoCodes filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Life360 in the District of Dela ...

Core Points - Netlist, Inc. has announced a joint public interest comment filed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) regarding its complaint against Samsung, Google, and Super Micro [1] - The company is seeking exclusion and cease and desist orders to prevent Samsung's memory products that infringe its patents from entering the U.S. [1] - Netlist claims that the Respondents infringe on its U.S. Patent Nos. [1]

Two of the country’s largest information technology (IT) services companies—Tata Consultancy Services Ltd and Wipro Ltd—faced fresh patent violations in the last 45 days, signalling challenges to their expansion of service offerings. The rise in such cases over the last five years comes as a double whammy for the country’s $283 billion IT sector, which is already grappling with low demand for IT services. Over the years, homegrown IT services companies have started to build software platforms and products ...

Core Viewpoint - A federal jury in California has ruled that Apple must pay Masimo $634 million for infringing on a patent related to blood-oxygen reading technology [1] Company Summary - Apple is facing a significant financial liability due to the jury's decision, which could impact its financial performance and market perception [1] - Masimo, a medical-monitoring technology company, has successfully defended its patent rights, potentially enhancing its market position and credibility in the healthcare technology sector [1]

Core Viewpoint - Nokia Corporation plans to delist its shares from the Euronext Paris stock exchange while maintaining listings on Nasdaq Helsinki and the New York Stock Exchange [1][2] Group 1: Delisting Plans - The decision to delist from Euronext Paris follows a review of trading volumes, costs, and administrative requirements associated with the Paris listing [2] - The delisting is expected to take effect within the next three months, pending approval from Euronext Paris's Board [2] Group 2: Share Performance - Nokia's shares on the NYSE have seen a significant increase, surging 44.4% over the past month, closing at $7.15 on Monday [3] - Nvidia Corp. has agreed to invest $1 billion for a 2.9% stake in Nokia, valuing the shares at $6.01 each [3] - Following this investment, Jefferies analyst Janardan Menon upgraded Nokia's rating from Hold to Buy [3] Group 3: Legal Developments - Nokia has filed a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Discovery, alleging infringement of its video encoding and decoding patents related to streaming services [4]

Core Viewpoint - Adeia Inc. has initiated patent infringement lawsuits against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) to protect its intellectual property rights related to semiconductor technologies [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Action - Adeia has filed lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas against AMD for allegedly infringing ten patents from its semiconductor IP portfolio [1][2]. - The patents in question include seven related to hybrid bonding technology and three concerning advanced process node technology [2]. Group 2: Company Position - The CEO of Adeia stated that the legal action is necessary to defend the company's intellectual property from AMD's unauthorized use, despite previous attempts to resolve the matter amicably [2][3]. - Adeia emphasizes its commitment to protecting its inventions and the interests of its shareholders and customers, while remaining open to a fair resolution [3]. Group 3: Intellectual Property Portfolio - Adeia has invested significantly in research and development over the past four decades, resulting in a substantial IP portfolio of over 13,000 patents worldwide [3]. - The company's IP is widely licensed across the media and semiconductor industries, contributing to the success of various connected devices [4].

Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against 7-Eleven, alleging that the company's AI-powered technologies infringe on eight patents from Alpha Modus's retail-intelligence portfolio [1][2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on October 22, 2025, and asserts eight patents related to AI retail engagement [2][4]. - The accused technologies include smart checkout systems, mobile app functionalities, store-camera analytics, digital signage, and point-of-sale systems [5][10]. - The patents in question include '571, '890, '880, '120, '731, '550, '121, and '718, covering capabilities such as audience measurement, behavioral analytics, and dynamic pricing [4][5]. Group 2: Enforcement Campaign - Alpha Modus is intensifying its enforcement efforts to protect its intellectual property in AI-powered retail intelligence, having previously filed similar lawsuits against other major retailers and technology partners [4]. - The company aims to ensure fair licensing and accountability within the retail technology ecosystem through these legal actions [4]. Group 3: Legal Remedies Sought - The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for willful infringement and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement by 7-Eleven [5].

Core Viewpoint - ParkerVision, Inc. has received a favorable ruling from the U.S. District Court, allowing it to appeal a previous judgment related to its patent infringement case against Qualcomm [1] Group 1: Legal Developments - On October 2, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted ParkerVision's Rule 54(b) motion [1] - This ruling enables ParkerVision to immediately appeal the district court's May 29, 2025 claim construction ruling [1] - The May 29 ruling resulted in a stipulated entry of summary judgment of non-infringement for ParkerVision's receiver patent claims [1]

Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus Ventures, LLC has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Cisco Systems, Inc. for allegedly infringing three patents related to Fibre Channel over Ethernet technology [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on June 9, 2025, and claims that Cisco's products, including its Unified Computing System and Converged Network Adapters, infringe on U.S. Patent Nos. 11,108,591, 11,310,077, and 11,303,473 [1][2]. - AMV is seeking monetary damages for Cisco's past use of the patented technology, asserting that Cisco's unauthorized use has led to significant commercial benefits at the expense of AMV's proprietary rights [3]. Group 2: Company Statements - Alpha Modus CEO William Alessi emphasized the company's commitment to protecting its intellectual property rights and stated that shareholders deserve recognition and compensation for the unauthorized use of their innovations [4].

Core Viewpoint - A patent infringement lawsuit filed by Carma Technology against Uber could have significant implications for Uber and potentially other companies in the ride-sharing industry [1][2]. Company Overview - Carma Technology, founded in 2007 by Sean O'Sullivan, has accused Uber of infringing on five patents related to matching riders with vehicle capacity, a core aspect of ride-sharing [2][3]. - The lawsuit seeks a jury trial, a permanent injunction against Uber, mandatory future royalties, damages, and other costs [3]. Legal Background - Carma first contacted Uber regarding its patents in 2016, during a period when Uber was valued at $66 billion and expanding rapidly [4][5]. - Uber was aware of Carma's patents as early as 2015 when a patent application was rejected due to existing patents held by Carma [6][8]. - Between 2016 and 2019, several of Uber's patent applications were rejected for similar reasons, leading to the abandonment of some applications [8]. Patent Details - The five patents in question are part of a larger family of 30 patents that Carma has developed over 18 years, with each patent containing multiple claims [10][11]. - The first patent, granted in 2010, established a shared transport system that matches empty vehicle space with riders or goods [17][18]. Business Model Shift - Carma initially focused on ride-sharing but shifted its business model to road-pricing services like GPS tolling and HOV verification by 2018 [20][23]. - The company aims to help transit authorities manage tolls and express lanes, promoting carpooling and reducing traffic congestion [22][23]. Financial Implications - Carma is currently profitable, but pursuing the lawsuit will impact its bottom line [24]. - The lawsuit is seen as a necessary step to protect the rights of inventors against larger companies that may infringe on patents [25][26].