Myriad Launches Revenue Share Program for Predictors and Builders► https://t.co/JDSEqiZxZV https://t.co/JDSEqiZxZV ...

Revenue Sharing & Competition - Platform introduces OpenLedger trading competition with 5 million OPEN token prize pool [1] - Sidekick wallet integration offers 65 million K token rewards [1] - Multiple concurrent competitions drive sustained engagement across newly listed projects [1]

hip-3 lets anyone stake 1m hype and deploy perpetual markets for 50% fee share forever. native markets won usdh because they built for this exact architecture. forget the stablecoin drama, builders who stake now own half the revenue from every trade on their markets for life. 282 slots available, dutch auction every 32 hours, that's your california gold rush. ...

Financial Implications - NCAA settlement introducing revenue sharing is set to strain school budgets [1] Potential Solutions - Passing the cost on to the most loyal and deep-pocketed fans is the most obvious solution [1]

RT BSCN (@BSCNews)🔶 REVENUE-SHARING ON $CORE DAO: It's a good time to be a developer in the @Coredao_Org ecosystem... Don't miss outhttps://t.co/pj24PLd7Eq ...

Core DAO Ecosystem - Core DAO 生态系统正处于开发者有利时期 [1] Revenue Sharing - 报告强调了在 Core DAO 上进行收入分成 [1] Call to Action - 报告鼓励开发者不要错过机会 [1]

Revenue Sharing - The document mentions a potential revenue sharing agreement [1] - It suggests using the author's referral link for revenue sharing purposes [1] Content Type - The content appears to be a social media post (tweet) with a link [1]

Core DAO Ecosystem - Core DAO 将与社区分享收入 [1] - 现在是加入 Core DAO 生态系统的最佳时机 [1]

Legal Challenge & Settlement Overview - Lawsuits challenge NCAA settlement's revenue distribution, alleging unfair representation of female athletes' value [1][2] - Settlement includes ~$8 billion in back pay for ~400,000 former athletes and revenue sharing for current athletes [2] - Revenue sharing estimated at $20 million annually, allowing athletes to earn from name, image, and likeness [2] Title IX Violation Allegations - Lawsuits claim settlement violates Title IX, federal law barring sex-based discrimination on college campuses [4] - Female athletes allegedly required to waive Title IX rights to receive back pay [4] - Disparity in revenue allocation between men's and women's sports is a key point of contention [3] Revenue Distribution Discrepancies - Men's football and basketball receive over 90% of revenue allocated to men's sports [3] - Top women's sport, basketball, receives only 1.1% of revenue [3] - Payouts for former athletes expected to mirror these disproportionate amounts [4] Athlete Perspectives - Plaintiffs argue male and female athletes invest equal effort, despite differing fan attendance [5] - Athletes advocate for equitable treatment and a larger share of revenue [7][8] - NCAA claims settlement provides significant financial benefits to student-athletes, totaling nearly 50% of athletics department revenue [6]

Legal Challenge & Settlement Overview - A lawsuit challenges the NCAA settlement, which allows direct payments to athletes for NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) use, estimating $20 million in revenue sharing annually [2] - The settlement includes $2.8 billion in back pay for approximately 400,000 former athletes, which is a point of contention in the lawsuit [3] - The judge overseeing the case acknowledged Title IX related arguments but allowed the settlement to proceed as an antitrust case, leaving the door open for future Title IX challenges [11][12] Title IX & Gender Equality Concerns - Plaintiffs argue the revenue distribution underestimates the value female athletes bring to universities and violates Title IX, the federal law barring sex-based discrimination on college campuses [2][4] - Women's basketball, the top-listed women's sport, receives 1.1% of the revenue pie, significantly less than men's football and basketball, which receive over 90% combined [4] - One plaintiff was estimated to receive around $400 in back pay, highlighting the disparity [5] - Female athletes feel they are settling for "scraps" and deserve more, seeking a bigger seat at the table [7] Proposed Funding Formula - Plaintiffs propose a specific formula for broadcast compensation and athlete service compensation, allocating funds based on the ratio of men to women in the athlete pool each year [9][10] - For example, if men comprise 60% of the athlete pool, they would receive 60% of the designated funding, with women receiving the remaining 40% [10] NCAA's Perspective - The NCAA considers the settlement a "massive win" for student-athletes, enabling schools to provide direct financial benefits totaling nearly 50% of athletics department revenue [6]