新华社北京6月25日电（记者尚昊、马欣然）国务院台办发言人朱凤莲25日在例行新闻发布会上就赖清 德24日所谓"团结十讲"第二场演讲中涉两岸关系内容评论指出，这一讲话是行"分裂"之实的"台独"自 白，为强化"台独"认同大肆鼓噪。 据报道，赖清德称，今年是故宫博物院建院100周年，届时台北故宫博物院将与美国博物馆合作，不打 算与大陆故宫博物院合作。朱凤莲对此评论指出，故宫博物院和台北故宫博物院同根同源、血脉相连， 珍藏着中华民族历史文化瑰宝，承载着两岸同胞共同记忆，是两岸同胞共同拥有的宝贵财富。两岸同胞 有责任共同传承好、弘扬好中华历史文化遗产。 她指出，赖清德在讲话中重弹"台独"旧调，刻意曲解历史，妄图制造仇恨与不满，加剧岛内社会撕裂， 营造"反中抗中"社会氛围，为其打压在野力量、推动"大罢免"进行政治造势；再次炒作两岸"互不隶 属"等"新两国论"，刻意煽动挑衅，升高两岸紧张；肆意抹黑两岸交流合作，把民众对和平稳定的期 盼、大陆对同胞的善意诚意污蔑为"统战渗透威胁"，极力操弄"抗中保台"，煽动升高两岸对立。台湾民 众对此不认同、不买账。 她强调，民进党当局出于谋"独"本性和政治私利，一方面极力推进"文化台独"" ...

最近，台湾地区领导人赖清德开启了一个所谓"团结国家十讲"的演讲，首站在新北市，6月22日演讲，第二站在桃园，6月24日演讲。 笔者将其定义为"台独"十讲。 虽然赖清德的"台独"演讲并无新意，不过是其过往"台独"言论的大杂烩，但是性质恶劣，影响极坏。所以，国台办发言人陈斌华在赖清德 发表第一场演讲之后的6月23日，就以应询答复的形式进行了回应。 陈斌华的回应长达1200字，历数了赖清德的5宗罪，主要内容如下：赖清德的讲话充斥着谎言与欺骗、敌意与挑衅，是一篇赤裸裸煽动两 岸对立对抗的"台独"宣言，是一盘错漏百出的"台独"歪理邪说大杂烩；赖清德否认台湾自古属于中国的事实，是对历史的歪曲和践踏；赖 清德把台湾同胞爱国爱乡爱土的感情与所谓"台独"挂钩，是对台湾人民光荣的爱国主义传统和无数先烈牺牲奉献的背叛和犯罪；赖清德 在讲话中偷换概念，抹杀二战胜利成果，是对国际法权威的公然挑战；赖清德在讲话中操弄"反中抗中"、强化"绿色恐怖"，阻挠两岸交流 交往，完全违背人心民意。 陈斌华表示，赖清德违背历史、现实和法理胡编乱造的种种谬论，只会被扫进历史的垃圾堆。赖清德无论怎样费尽心机，都阻挡不了祖 国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大势 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes Lai Ching-te's recent speech, claiming it distorts historical facts regarding Taiwan's relationship with China and promotes a narrative of Taiwanese independence that lacks academic support [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Historical Context - The article asserts that Taiwan has historically been an inseparable part of China, with evidence from various historical records indicating that the majority of Taiwan's population, including indigenous peoples, migrated from the mainland [4][5]. - It highlights that archaeological findings, such as stone tools and pottery, link Taiwan's prehistoric cultures to those of mainland China, particularly from regions like Fujian and Guangdong [2][3]. Critique of Lai Ching-te's Arguments - Lai's claims about Taiwan's historical independence and unique cultural identity are described as misleading and lacking in scholarly rigor, with references to specific archaeological sites being misrepresented [1][2][3]. - The article emphasizes that Lai's narrative attempts to sever the historical ties between Taiwan and mainland China, particularly regarding the Austronesian language family and its origins [2][3]. National Identity and Sentiment - The article argues that Lai's rhetoric undermines the shared identity and historical consciousness of the Taiwanese people as part of the Chinese nation, suggesting that his approach is a betrayal of national sentiment [5][6]. - It recounts the sacrifices made by Taiwanese people during the Japanese occupation, framing their resistance as a demonstration of their Chinese identity, which Lai allegedly misrepresents [5][6]. Conclusion - The article concludes that Lai's attempts to rewrite history and promote a separatist agenda are ultimately flawed and will not succeed in altering the deep-rooted connections between Taiwan and mainland China [6].

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles revolves around the criticism of Lai Ching-te's speech, which is perceived as promoting "Taiwan independence" and creating division between Taiwan and mainland China [1][2][3] - Lai's rhetoric is described as filled with factual inaccuracies and historical distortions, which are seen as attempts to provoke confrontation and undermine the principle of "One China" [1][2] - The articles assert that Lai's actions are politically motivated, aiming to consolidate power and eliminate opposition under the guise of unity, while neglecting the welfare of the Taiwanese people [2][3] Group 2 - The narrative emphasizes that the trend towards unification is historically inevitable, while "Taiwan independence" is portrayed as a misguided and ultimately doomed path [3] - The articles argue that Lai's continued provocations will lead to failure and destruction, reinforcing the idea that the push for independence is unsustainable in the face of historical and social realities [3]

6月23日，国务院台办发言人陈斌华答记者问。问：台湾地区领导人22日展开所谓"团结国家十讲"第一 场演讲，请问对讲话中涉两岸关系内容有何评论？答：赖清德22日的讲话充斥着谎言与欺骗、敌意与挑 衅，刻意曲解、割裂历史，大肆兜售"台独"分裂谬论，妄图为其建构"台独"论述炮制拼凑依据，为其推 动"大罢免"政治斗争谋取政治私利进行文宣造势，是一篇赤裸裸煽动两岸对立对抗的"台独"宣言，是一 盘错漏百出的"台独"歪理邪说大杂烩，充分暴露其冥顽不化的"台独"本性。(央视新闻) ...

转自：北京日报客户端 据报道，台当局近日更新"出口管制名单"，将华为和中芯国际列入。如岛内厂商想"出口"给管制名单中 的实体，须先取得台"国贸署"许可。不难看出，此举是台当局对美国遏华政策的又一次跟进。 谁都能看出，对美国，台湾只是一张"牌"；但对中国而言，台湾事关核心利益。我们具有坚定意志解决 台湾问题、实现国家统一，维护国家主权和领土完整的能力坚不可摧，反对"台独"分裂和外来干涉的行 动坚决有力。无论是谁、无论如何折腾，挑衅愈甚，反制也将愈烈。 众所周知，将华为和中芯国际列入"黑名单"，是美国泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和长臂管辖的产 物。此前，台湾也禁止了向大陆"出口"光刻机等关键芯片制造设备，但基于岛内产业结构和发展所需， 并未将大陆主要科技企业或芯片制造商统统禁掉。据统计，2024年台湾第一大"出口"市场为大陆及香 港，占整体比重的31.7%，出口额为1506.19亿美元，其中约六成是电子产品。联系如此紧密，却在此刻 切断，有专家分析，不排除是台当局希望抓住这一轮中美贸易谈判的当口，发布"出口禁令"，"显示出 与美国的协作性"。 然而，这些年，台独的"投名状"一直没断过，美国真买账吗？在美国利益面 ...

Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The 17th Straits Forum held in Xiamen, Fujian, focused on "expanding civil exchanges and deepening integrated development," with over 7,000 attendees from Taiwan, including former Kuomintang Chairman Ma Ying-jeou [1] - The Taiwanese "Tourism Bureau" rejected an application for mainland personnel to hold the "2025 Cross-Strait Taipei Summer Travel Exhibition," marking the first interruption due to non-pandemic factors, which disrupts long-established cooperation mechanisms in the tourism industry [1] - The absence of mainland exhibitors at the travel exhibition will hinder the presentation of cross-strait tourism resources and reduce opportunities for collaboration, impacting tourism project negotiations and promotions [1] Group 2: Economic Impact - The Taiwanese "International Trade Bureau" has blacklisted Huawei, SMIC, and their subsidiaries, severing cooperation in technology research, technical exchanges, and supply chains, which negatively affects Taiwan's economy and livelihoods [2] - The blacklisting of Huawei and SMIC will disrupt existing partnerships and reduce orders for Taiwanese companies, potentially leading to layoffs and increased unemployment rates in Taiwan [2] - The DPP's actions to block cross-strait exchanges are part of a broader strategy to achieve "Taiwan independence," which includes restrictions on tourism and educational exchanges, increasing costs and risks for Taiwanese citizens [3] Group 3: Policy Comparison - The DPP's policies are characterized by a closed and obstructive approach, contrasting with the mainland's open and proactive stance, leading to a struggle between "anti-independence and pro-unification" versus "independence and rejection of unification" [4] - The DPP's narrative distorts the essence of cross-strait exchanges, labeling them as political maneuvers and claiming that the mainland uses economic ties to bind Taiwan [4] - The DPP's obstruction of cross-strait exchanges not only undermines peace and stability in cross-strait relations but also directly impacts Taiwan's economy, society, and livelihoods [4]

6月13日下午，国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校就近期涉军问题发布消息。蒋斌：台 湾问题纯属中国内政，不容任何外来干涉。任何怂恿支持"台独"分子搞分裂的行径，都只会破坏台海和 地区和平稳定，也必将引火烧身、自食苦果。我们敦促有关国家切实恪守一个中国原则，停止向"台 独"分裂势力发出任何错误信号。在祖国终将统一、必将统一的历史大势面前，任何"倚外谋独"、"以台 制华"的图谋都注定失败。(国防部发布) ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the actions of Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seen as a facade for promoting "Taiwan independence" under the guise of "democracy and freedom," misleading both the international community and the Taiwanese public [1][2][3] - The DPP is accused of distorting the concept of "one China" and using it to label legitimate governance as "authoritarian," while framing their separatist actions as a defense of democracy [2][3] - The DPP's policies are characterized as a form of "green terror," suppressing dissent and limiting freedom of expression through political persecution and media manipulation [3][4] Group 2 - The DPP's military budget has reached historical highs, and they are implementing policies aimed at creating a wartime society, which is seen as a provocation that undermines cross-strait relations [4] - Public dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's governance is highlighted, with over 53% of the population expressing discontent, marking the highest dissatisfaction rate for a leader's first anniversary in nearly 30 years [4] - The DPP's economic policies are criticized for exacerbating wealth inequality and failing to address the low wage crisis faced by the younger generation in Taiwan [4][5] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the essence of democracy is to ensure that the people's will is reflected in governance, contrasting this with the DPP's approach [5] - It argues that only under the framework of national unity can the democratic rights and welfare of Taiwanese people be genuinely safeguarded [5][6] - The narrative concludes that any separatist actions disguised as "democracy" are a betrayal of historical justice and national integrity, with a warning that those who persist in such actions will be condemned by history [6]

记者：据报道，特朗普政府计划在第二任期大幅增加对台军售，预计未来4年批准对台军售规模将超 过其第一任期的总额183亿美元；美方还施压台"在野党"勿阻挡民进党当局提高防务预算。此外，赖 清德表示台防务预算要达GDP3%或更高。对此有何评论？ 国台办发言人朱凤莲：我们坚决反对美国向中国台湾地区出售武器，敦促美方恪守一个中国原则和 中美三个联合公报规定，慎重处理台湾问题，停止售台武器，停止"武装台湾"，停止支持怂恿"台 独"分裂势力"以武谋独"。 近期有岛内民调显示，超过六成的受访者认为，美国要求台湾提高军购费用，是想卖军火赚更多 钱。这充分证明，越来越多的台湾民众认清了美国把台湾当"提款机"、"火药桶"的险恶用心。但赖 清德当局为谋取"台独"私利，悖逆民意，置岛内安全利益于不顾，甘当鱼肉任人宰割，无底线"卖 台"、"害台"。这种"倚外谋独"、"以武谋独"的行径注定失败。 国台办举行例行新闻发布会。 ...