针对7名中国国民党籍民意代表的罢免案8月23日均宣告失败，加上7月26日针对24名国民党籍民意代表 和原民众党籍的新竹市长的罢免案也都未通过，民进党当局策动的"大罢免"被完封，以大失败告终。这 一结果反映台湾民众对其只谋一党之私、沉迷政治操弄、鼓吹"抗中保台"、漠视经济民生的强烈不满， 清晰传递出台湾社会期盼改善经济民生、推动两岸交流合作的普遍心声。 台湾《中国时报》24日刊发社论指出，两轮投票都清楚表达台湾民意对"大罢免"、对民进党的不支持。 若赖清德和民进党继续执迷不悟，继续把台湾推向仇恨与对立，不尊重多数民意，不调整错误的能源与 两岸政策，那么"大罢免"的结果只是"前菜"，下次民众还会继续用"更大的民主"，彻底终结这个脱离民 意的当局。 "台湾民意清晰可见：拒绝'抗中保台'的政治操弄，希望台当局着眼于改善经济民生和两岸关系，期待 两岸继续交流合作、走和平发展之路，渴望过上安定、富足的日子。"包承柯说，若赖清德当局依旧罔 顾台湾民众核心诉求，冥顽不化走谋"独"老路，不知悬崖勒马，将会招致台湾民众一波接一波的反对， 陷入民意反噬的困境，难逃加速垮台的结局。 （新华社北京8月24日电） 岛内资深媒体人单厚之在 ...

据环球时报报道，美国对台征收20%的所谓"对等关税"于8月7日生效，不料惊传还要叠加关税，台湾的 实际税率为"20+N"。岛内顿时哀鸿遍野。美国《纽约时报》分析称，台湾经济以出口为主，美国堪称 最大买家。作为全球半导体供应链的关键节点，台湾的主要出口产品是芯片及其所关联的电子组件。此 外，台湾是金属工具与不锈钢板的重要出口地，也是全球第三大金属紧固件（如螺丝、螺栓）产地，大 部分销往美国，"因此，这些制造商正是20%关税'海啸第一排'"。 7月31日，我国防部在人民大会堂举办招待会，以庆祝建军98周年。中国防长在致辞期间，对涉台问题 表达了极为强硬的立场。董军表示，绝不会允许任何"台独"分裂企图得逞，解放军时刻准备着，随时挫 败外来武力干涉，实现祖国的完全统一。这既是对台当局下达的通牒，也是在提醒其认清现实。实现两 岸统一，是全体国人的共同心愿，也是我们实现民族伟大复兴期间必然要完成的目标。这些年来，解放 军一直在厉兵秣马，不断强化收台能力。 中国防长那语气，硬得很，直接放话："搞'台独'就是自取灭亡！"你瞅瞅，这话多有力量。他还细数了 民进党当局上台后的种种恶行，政治上否认"九二共识"，法律上瞎搞"修宪修法 ...

据报道，近期岛内多份民调显示，赖清德施政满意度大幅下跌，创上任以来新低，其不满意度、不 信任度均超过半数。对此，朱凤莲指出，一段时间以来，赖清德变本加厉兜售"台独"谬论，加剧岛内社 会撕裂，打压两岸交流合作，挑动两岸对立对抗，出卖同胞利益福祉，破坏台海和平稳定。这些只顾政 治私利、漠视民生疾苦的行径，悖离民意，不得人心，台湾老百姓都清清楚楚看在眼里。 民进党当局称，正在调查16家大陆公司，涉嫌未经当局批准在台非法招聘工程师和无证经营办公 室。对此，朱凤莲表示，民进党当局心中只有一党私利，他们在关税谈判上对美国唯唯诺诺、予取予 求，不关心岛内企业面对高昂的关税如何生存、不花力气研究如何应对关税霸凌，却在推动两岸"脱钩 断链"、破坏两岸经济合作上处心积虑、动作频频。这些出于政治私利的做法不得人心，只会损害台湾 营商环境，限缩台湾经济发展空间。 民进党当局称，出于安全及产业发展等考虑，将严格防堵大陆品牌汽车以各种方式进入台湾市场。 对此，朱凤莲表示，包括新能源汽车在内的大陆产品，以创新技术和卓越性能受到全球消费者的欢迎。 两岸在相关领域加强合作对台湾民众和业界都是实实在在的好事。民进党当局出于一己私利，罔顾岛内 民 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statements from Zhu Fenglian highlight the ongoing tensions in the Taiwan Strait, attributing the root cause to Lai Ching-te's pro-independence stance and collaboration with external forces, which are seen as provocations against the mainland [1][2] Group 1: Lai Ching-te's Actions - Lai Ching-te has been accused of promoting a pro-independence narrative and exaggerating the so-called "mainland threat," which is viewed as a false narrative to rally support for independence [1] - His administration has been characterized by the implementation of "green terror," targeting individuals and organizations that support cross-strait relations [1] - The push for "decoupling" from the mainland and limiting exchanges has been emphasized, alongside an increase in military spending and a call for a "全民皆兵" (everyone a soldier) approach [1] Group 2: Consequences and Warnings - Zhu Fenglian warns that the actions of Lai Ching-te and the pro-independence forces will lead to historical judgment and that any attempts at independence will ultimately fail [2] - The statement asserts that the trend towards national reunification is unstoppable, and any malicious schemes will be doomed to failure [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities have mandated the use of 13 supplementary teaching materials titled "Understanding the Threat from China" for the new school term starting in September, which has sparked widespread criticism across various sectors on the island [1] Group 1 - The supplementary materials are perceived as politically charged and potentially harmful to educational integrity [1] - Experts have raised concerns about the implications of such materials on students' understanding of international relations and regional stability [1] - The introduction of these materials is seen as part of a broader strategy to shape public perception regarding China [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the Taiwanese drama "Zero Day Attack," which portrays a scenario of military conflict between Taiwan and the mainland, highlighting the political tensions and societal reactions within Taiwan [1]. Group 1: Political Reactions - The drama has faced criticism within Taiwan, with many accusing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of exploiting "war anxiety" to provoke conflict and rally support for military actions [1]. - There is a sentiment that the DPP's actions may lead to Taiwan's citizens becoming "cannon fodder" in a potential conflict, reflecting a deepening divide in public opinion regarding cross-strait relations [1]. Group 2: Public Sentiment - The article notes that the DPP's approach is seen as detrimental to the well-being of the Taiwanese people, suggesting that their policies may not resonate positively with the general populace [1]. - The criticism indicates a growing discontent among the Taiwanese public towards the DPP's handling of cross-strait issues, which could have implications for future political stability [1].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the tension in the Taiwan Strait, attributing it to the "Taiwan independence" stance of the Lai Ching-te administration, which is seen as a threat to regional stability and peace [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that foreign companies operating in Taiwan should recognize the risks associated with the current geopolitical climate, particularly in light of the reported evacuation plans by Japanese firms [1] - The statement calls for other nations to oppose "Taiwan independence" and support China's unification efforts as a means to ensure regional peace and the safety of their own citizens [1]

Core Viewpoint - The essence of Lai Ching-te's administration is described as "false democracy, true dictatorship," which has been recognized by the world [1] Group 1: Political Context - The spokesperson from the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that there is only one China and Taiwan is part of it, asserting that 23 million Taiwanese are all part of the Chinese nation [1] - The spokesperson stated that differences in systems should not be an obstacle to unification, nor an excuse for division, framing the current struggle against "Taiwan independence" as a fight between unification and division, and justice versus evil [1] Group 2: Criticism of Lai Ching-te's Administration - Since Lai Ching-te's administration took office, it has allegedly suppressed political dissent within Taiwan, creating a "chilling effect" and engaging in what is termed "green terror" [1] - The administration is accused of stubbornly adhering to a "Taiwan independence" stance, provoking actions that aim to bind the Taiwanese people to the "Taiwan independence" agenda, which contradicts democratic principles [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent large-scale recall election in Taiwan resulted in a significant defeat for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), indicating a shift in public sentiment against the "Taiwan independence" stance and the "anti-China" narrative promoted by the DPP [2][3][5][10]. Group 1: Election Outcome - The recall election held on July 26 saw voters reject the recall of 24 Kuomintang (KMT) legislators and the mayor of Hsinchu City, Gao Hongan from the People's Party, signaling a clear disapproval of the DPP's actions [2]. - The election results suggest that mainstream public opinion in Taiwan is moving away from supporting "Taiwan independence" [3][5]. Group 2: Implications for DPP's Strategy - The DPP's campaign slogan of "anti-China to protect Taiwan" was heavily criticized, with the failure of the recall election raising questions about its effectiveness and future viability [4][6][10]. - Concerns have been raised within the DPP regarding the sustainability of the "anti-China" narrative and the feasibility of pursuing "Taiwan independence" in light of the election results [6][8]. Group 3: International Reactions - Observers from Japan noted that the recall election results could imply a weakening of the DPP's "anti-China" stance and raise doubts about Taiwan's commitment to resisting unification with mainland China [8][10]. - The response from the U.S. has not been prominently reported, but it is generally understood that the U.S. focuses more on democratic processes, while Japan is more concerned with the issue of Taiwan's independence [11]. Group 4: Mainland China's Response - The response from mainland China was notably measured, with the Taiwan Affairs Office commenting on the election results a day later, indicating a relaxed attitude towards the developments [15][16]. - The official statement criticized the DPP for its "Taiwan independence" agenda and political maneuvering, suggesting that the election results reflect a disconnect between the DPP's actions and public sentiment [16][18]. Group 5: Future Considerations - A subsequent wave of recall elections is scheduled for August 23, where seven KMT legislators will be subject to voting, raising questions about their ability to withstand similar scrutiny [19][20].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the recent recall election in Taiwan signifies a rejection of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) stance on "Taiwan independence" and its "anti-China" narrative [2][3][4] - The failure of the recall election raises concerns within the DPP about the sustainability of their "anti-China" platform and the viability of pursuing "Taiwan independence" [5][6] - Observations from Japan indicate that the recall election results challenge the DPP's "anti-China" stance, suggesting a potential shift in public sentiment against "Taiwan independence" [7][6] Group 2 - The response from mainland China to the recall election was notably calm and delayed, indicating a strategic approach to the political developments in Taiwan [12][11] - The official statement from the Taiwan Affairs Office criticized the DPP for its political maneuvers and highlighted the disconnect between the DPP's actions and public sentiment [13][15] - The upcoming second wave of recall elections scheduled for August 23 will further test the resilience of the current political landscape in Taiwan, particularly for the seven KMT legislators involved [16]