Core Viewpoint - The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is a passively managed ETF designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and low operating costs [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Overview - SPYV was launched on September 25, 2000, and is sponsored by State Street Global Advisors, accumulating over $27.48 billion in assets [1]. - The ETF targets large-cap companies, typically those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, which are considered stable investments with lower risk compared to mid and small-cap companies [2]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - SPYV aims to match the performance of the S&P 500 Value Index, which measures large-cap value sector performance in the US equity market [7]. - As of July 28, 2025, SPYV has increased by approximately 5.97% year-to-date and 9.44% over the past year, with a trading range between $45.11 and $55.27 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 0.87 and a standard deviation of 14.60% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. Group 3: Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for SPYV are 0.04%, making it one of the least expensive options in its category, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.97% [4]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 24.20% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Healthcare [5]. - Microsoft Corp (MSFT) represents approximately 7.25% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 28.17% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - SPYV holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected performance based on various factors [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) with $71.33 billion in assets and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) with $141.62 billion, both tracking similar indices [10].

Core Viewpoint - The Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with a focus on stable income through investments in profitable U.S. companies with high dividend yields and lower volatility [1][7]. Group 1: Fund Overview - LVHD is a passively managed ETF launched on December 28, 2015, and is sponsored by Franklin Templeton Investments [1]. - The fund has accumulated assets exceeding $579.65 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.27%, which is competitive within its peer group [4]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large cap companies, typically with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are considered stable investments with lower risk and more reliable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although growth stocks tend to perform better in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Staples sector, comprising approximately 24.40% of the portfolio, followed by Utilities and Real Estate [5]. - Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO) is the largest individual holding at about 2.65% of total assets, with Chevron Corp (CVX) and Medtronic Plc (MDT) also among the top holdings [6]. - The top 10 holdings collectively account for around 25.11% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - LVHD aims to match the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index, which focuses on stable income through investments in high dividend yield stocks with lower volatility [7]. - The ETF has recorded a gain of approximately 7.90% year-to-date and an increase of about 12.48% over the past year as of July 28, 2025 [7]. - Over the past 52 weeks, LVHD has traded within a range of $37.37 to $41.26 [7]. Group 5: Risk and Diversification - The ETF has a beta of 0.66 and a standard deviation of 13.37% over the trailing three-year period, indicating lower volatility compared to the broader market [8]. - With around 122 holdings, LVHD effectively diversifies company-specific risk [8]. Group 6: Alternatives and Market Position - LVHD carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a stable position based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases of $71.33 billion and $141.62 billion, respectively [10].

Another close here, David. Another close. Green all over the screen.Uh, David, I was just talking to Lou about this. Look ahead. We just keep kind of melting up here.David, what are your expectations. You know, unfortunately, I think the market right now is probably getting a little bit overextended. When I look at our valuations, the market overall is trading at about a 2 to 3% premium to a composite of our fair values.Yeah, we cover over 700 stocks that trade on US exchanges. So, we compare our intrinsic ...

Core Insights - The article compares Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) and Silicon Motion (SIMO) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors [1] Group 1: Stock Performance and Rankings - Both HPE and SIMO currently hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook due to favorable analyst estimate revisions [3] - The Zacks Rank emphasizes earnings estimates and revisions, which are crucial for value investors [2] Group 2: Valuation Metrics - HPE has a forward P/E ratio of 10.80, while SIMO has a higher forward P/E of 21.63, suggesting HPE may be undervalued [5] - HPE's PEG ratio is 1.86, indicating a more favorable valuation when considering expected earnings growth, compared to SIMO's PEG ratio of 10.20 [5] - HPE's P/B ratio is 1.12, significantly lower than SIMO's P/B of 3.25, further supporting HPE's stronger valuation metrics [6] - Based on these valuation figures, HPE is rated as a superior value option with a Value grade of A, while SIMO has a Value grade of D [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) is a passively managed fund that provides broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $3.17 billion, making it an average-sized ETF in this category [1]. Group 1: Large Cap Value - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion and are considered more stable, with predictable cash flows and lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 2: Costs - The expense ratio for SPHD is 0.30%, which is competitive with most peer products, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 3.43% [4]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Real Estate sector, comprising about 20.70% of the portfolio, followed by Utilities and Consumer Staples [5]. - Crown Castle Inc (CCI) is the largest holding at approximately 3.49% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 28.65% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance and Risk - SPHD aims to match the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, which includes 50 securities known for high dividend yields and low volatility [7]. - The ETF has returned approximately 3.45% year-to-date and 9.46% over the past year, with a trading range between $44.37 and $51.75 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - With a beta of 0.71 and a standard deviation of 14.80% over the trailing three years, SPHD is classified as a medium risk investment [8]. Group 5: Alternatives - Other ETFs in the same space include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger assets of $71.22 billion and $141.05 billion, respectively, and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04% [11]. Group 6: Bottom-Line - Passively managed ETFs like SPHD are increasingly popular among retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Group 1 - The article compares two stocks in the Financial - Investment Management sector: Patria Investments (PAX) and Apollo Global Management Inc. (APO) to determine which presents a better value opportunity for investors [1] - Patria Investments has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision activity compared to Apollo Global Management Inc., which has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) [3] - Value investors consider various valuation metrics, including P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share, to assess whether a company is undervalued [4] Group 2 - PAX has a forward P/E ratio of 10.20, while APO has a forward P/E of 19.81, suggesting that PAX may be undervalued relative to APO [5] - The PEG ratio for PAX is 0.69, indicating a favorable valuation when considering expected earnings growth, whereas APO has a PEG ratio of 1.61 [5] - PAX's P/B ratio is 1.69, compared to APO's P/B of 2.8, further supporting the notion that PAX is a more attractive value option [6] Group 3 - PAX is noted for its improving earnings outlook, which enhances its attractiveness in the Zacks Rank model, positioning it as the superior value option at present [7]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Ingredion (INGR) and Danone (DANOY) indicates that Ingredion presents a better value opportunity for investors at this time [1]. Valuation Metrics - Both Ingredion and Danone hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revisions for both companies [3]. - Ingredion has a forward P/E ratio of 11.80, while Danone has a forward P/E of 18.29, suggesting that Ingredion is more attractively priced [5]. - The PEG ratio for Ingredion is 1.07, compared to Danone's PEG ratio of 5.68, further indicating that Ingredion may be undervalued relative to its growth prospects [5]. - Ingredion's P/B ratio is 2.16, while Danone's P/B ratio is 2.79, reinforcing the notion that Ingredion offers better value [6]. - Based on these valuation metrics, Ingredion has a Value grade of A, while Danone has a Value grade of C [6]. Earnings Outlook - Both companies have solid earnings outlooks, but Ingredion's valuation figures suggest it is the superior value option currently [7].

Core Insights - The First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders ETF (FDL) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $5.65 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Overview - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, offering a stable investment option with lower risk and more reliable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks are characterized by lower than average price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, as well as lower sales and earnings growth rates. Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in nearly all markets, although growth stocks tend to perform better in strong bull markets [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.43%, which is competitive within its peer group, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 4.58% [4] - FDL aims to match the performance of the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, which includes stocks with consistent and sustainable dividends. The ETF has gained approximately 10.15% year-to-date and 15.34% over the past year, with a trading range of $38.19 to $43.95 in the last 52 weeks [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Energy sector, comprising about 25.30% of the portfolio, followed by Healthcare and Consumer Staples [5] - Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represents approximately 10.20% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 55.23% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - FDL has a beta of 0.72 and a standard deviation of 15.02% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile. The ETF holds about 101 stocks, effectively diversifying company-specific risk [8] - Alternatives to FDL include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which track similar indices but have larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10] Group 5: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is a significant investment vehicle for gaining exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $113.80 billion, making it one of the largest ETFs in this category [1]. Group 1: Large Cap Growth Characteristics - Large cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are generally more stable and exhibit predictable cash flows, making them less volatile compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Growth stocks are characterized by faster growth rates, higher valuations, and above-average sales and earnings growth rates, but they carry a greater level of risk compared to value stocks [3]. Group 2: Cost Structure - The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.19%, positioning it as one of the more cost-effective options in the ETF space, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.41% [4]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation of approximately 52.20% to the Information Technology sector, followed by Consumer Discretionary and Telecom [5]. - Nvidia Corp (NVDA) constitutes about 12.69% of the total assets, with Microsoft Corp (MSFT) and Apple Inc (AAPL) also among the top holdings; the top 10 holdings represent around 58.68% of total assets [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - The ETF aims to replicate the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index, achieving a return of approximately 8.91% year-to-date and around 19.17% over the past year as of July 24, 2025; it has traded between $320.42 and $436.59 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - With a beta of 1.14 and a standard deviation of 20.93% over the trailing three-year period, the ETF is classified as a medium-risk investment, effectively diversifying company-specific risk with about 389 holdings [8]. Group 5: Alternatives - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ) are alternative ETFs tracking similar indices, with VUG having $179.85 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04%, while QQQ has $358.67 billion in assets and charges 0.20% [11]. Group 6: Conclusion - Passively managed ETFs like IWF are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a leading option for investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on mid-cap companies that balance stability and growth potential [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF was launched on July 17, 2001, and is sponsored by Blackrock, with assets exceeding $19.54 billion, making it the largest ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.23% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.37%, which is competitive within the sector [4]. Group 2: Market Characteristics - Mid cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, provide a unique investment opportunity with a favorable risk-return profile compared to small and large companies [2]. - Growth stocks, while offering higher sales and earnings growth rates, come with higher valuations and risks, typically outperforming value stocks in bull markets but lagging over the long term [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Discretionary sector, comprising approximately 22.90% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Information Technology [5]. - The top holdings include Royal Caribbean Group Ltd (2.78% of total assets), Howmet Aerospace Inc, and Vistra Corp, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 20.28% of total assets [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - The ETF aims to match the performance of the Russell MidCap Growth Index, which represents about 47% of the total market value of the Russell MidCap Index [7]. - As of July 23, 2025, the ETF has gained approximately 10.64% year-to-date and 24.93% over the past year, with a trading range between $103.87 and $140.64 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 5: Alternatives - Other ETFs in the mid-cap growth space include the iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) with $9 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.17%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) with $17.47 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [11]. Group 6: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like IWP are increasingly popular among retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].