Summary of Conference Call Company Overview - The company has focused on identifying, owning, and developing high return assets while maintaining a leadership position in sustainability and stewardship [1][2] - The company operates primarily in the Lower 48 states and emphasizes operational execution and capital efficiency [2] Key Highlights Operational Performance - The company has a strong track record in geoscience and engineering, which has allowed it to identify and exploit overlooked opportunities in various basins [2][3] - In Howard County, the number of horizontal wells increased from 79 to over 4,900 in less than a decade, demonstrating significant growth and attractive economics [4] - The Austin Chalk play in Webb and Dimmit Counties saw breakeven prices drop from $80 per barrel to $44, showcasing the impact of technology and improved understanding of the geology [5][6] Uinta Basin Development - The Uinta Basin is viewed as the next significant opportunity, with extensive data from over 8,500 vertical wells aiding in derisking [7][8] - The company has about 200 horizontal wells in the lower cube of the Uinta Basin, with competitive margins similar to the Permian Basin [9] - The integration of operations in the Uinta Basin has led to improved capital efficiency and record pumping times [17][18] Technology and Optimization - The company employs advanced technology and data analysis to optimize well designs, resulting in better performance compared to peers [10][12] - Cumulative oil production per 10,000 feet of lateral was reported to be 32% better in Howard County and 42% better in the Austin Chalk compared to peer-operated wells [13] Financial Strategy - The company aims to maximize free cash flow while managing capital allocation across different basins [24][30] - Hedging strategies have been enhanced, with over 40% of oil hedged for the next year to mitigate risks associated with commodity price volatility [26][29] - The company plans to focus on debt repayment before resuming stock buybacks, with a target of achieving a 1x leverage ratio [22][50] Industry Context - The company is navigating a challenging macroeconomic environment with lower oil prices and economic uncertainty, but maintains its operational budget [23][24] - There is a measured approach to capital allocation, with potential shifts towards gas-focused plays if market conditions improve [30][32] Additional Insights - The company has seen slight cost deflation in specific service areas, but labor costs remain unchanged [55] - The use of simul frac technology is being maximized where feasible, particularly in the Uinta Basin [58][59] - The company has a strong ESG score, ranking number one among oil-focused operators [21] Conclusion - The company is well-positioned to capitalize on its operational strengths and technological advancements while navigating the current market challenges. The focus on capital efficiency, debt reduction, and strategic hedging will be crucial for future growth and shareholder value creation.

Core Insights - Prairie Operating Co. (PROP) is focusing on disciplined cost control and operational efficiencies as a competitive advantage in the DJ Basin [1][3] - The company is self-sourcing critical inputs and utilizing proprietary logistics to minimize costs and project timelines [2][8] - Prairie's strategy allows for scalable growth and margin preservation, providing a buffer against market volatility [3][6] Company Strategy - PROP is implementing a capital-light development program with a focus on short payback wells, allowing for flexibility while expanding production [1][8] - The company has 157 permits and over 586 gross locations in the DJ Basin, positioning itself effectively in a less competitive environment [6][8] - The shift of major players like Chevron and Civitas Resources away from the DJ Basin has created opportunities for Prairie to execute its strategy [4][5] Financial Performance - Shares of Prairie Operating Co. have decreased by 43% year to date [7] - The company trades at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 0.32, significantly below the sector average, indicating potential undervaluation [9] - Recent Zacks Consensus Estimates for 2025 and 2026 EPS have been revised down by 18% and 20%, respectively [11]

Core Insights - Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a return on equity (ROE) of 23.56%, which is below the industry average of 32.34%, indicating less profit generation per dollar of shareholder equity compared to peers [1][8] - The company's focus on long-cycle contracts and significant investments in product development and infrastructure may be impacting short-term returns but could lead to sustainable future growth [2][8] - Palantir's transition to modular sales and usage-based pricing may temporarily affect margins while aiming to broaden its client base [2][8] Capital Efficiency Comparison - Investors seeking strong capital efficiency may consider alternatives like ServiceNow (NOW) and CrowdStrike (CRWD), which demonstrate scalable margins and consistent ROE growth [5][9] - ServiceNow benefits from a loyal enterprise client base and deep integration in IT workflows, while CrowdStrike maintains high ROE through its cloud-native security platform, showcasing robust returns and accelerated annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth [5][6][9] Strategic Positioning - The ROE gap between Palantir and more efficient software firms highlights a trade-off between Palantir's strategic positioning and its current capital efficiency [3][4] - Long-term investors may overlook short-term underperformance if they believe in Palantir's growth trajectory, while those focused on immediate returns might prefer companies with stronger ROE profiles [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - Elevance Health, Inc. is trading at a discount with a forward 12-month P/E ratio of 10.35X, below its five-year median of 13.46X and the industry average of 13.86X, indicating attractive valuation compared to peers [1][2] Group 1: Growth Drivers - Elevance is positioned for sustained growth through strategic initiatives in its commercial and government segments, with commercial memberships growing 4.6% and 1% year-over-year in 2024, and a notable 14.2% increase in its Individual Commercial business in Q1 2025 [4][5] - The company has streamlined its government business by exiting underperforming markets, enhancing efficiency and potential for growth in Medicare Advantage in underpenetrated states [5] - Elevance's Return on Invested Capital stands at 9.94%, significantly above the industry average of 5.79%, showcasing superior capital deployment capabilities [6] Group 2: Shareholder Returns - The company is committed to returning capital to shareholders, having repurchased $880 million worth of shares in Q1 2025, with $8.4 billion remaining under its buyback authorization, and a dividend yield of 1.82%, exceeding the industry average of 1.40% [7] Group 3: Market Performance - Despite broader market challenges, Elevance shares have gained 1.9% year-to-date, outperforming both the industry and the S&P 500, while peers UnitedHealth and Humana have experienced declines [8] Group 4: Financial Estimates - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Elevance's EPS indicates a 4.2% increase for 2025 and a 13.8% increase for 2026, with revenue estimates suggesting an 11.2% increase for 2025 and a 7.1% increase for 2026 [11] Group 5: Challenges and Risks - Elevance faces challenges including a decline in Medicaid and Medicare Supplement membership, which could lead to overall membership losses and reduced revenues [12] - Rising medical costs are a significant concern, with the benefit expense ratio increasing from 87% in 2023 to an estimated 88.7% in 2025, indicating pressure on earnings [13] - Regulatory uncertainties, particularly related to the Pharmacy Benefit Management industry, pose additional risks for Elevance [14]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Consolidated revenues for Q1 2025 totaled $550.1 million, a 4.2% increase from Q1 2024 [21] - Consolidated gross profit was $20.3 million, reflecting a 53.1% increase year-over-year, with a gross profit margin of 3.7% compared to 2.5% in the prior year [21] - Net loss attributable to common stock was $17.9 million, or a diluted loss per share of $0.20, an improvement from a net loss of $25.1 million or $0.35 per share in the same period last year [22] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 2025 was $24.2 million, approximately 20% higher than the prior year [22] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. Gas segment revenue totaled $197.7 million, a year-over-year decrease of 12.7%, with a gross profit margin of -7.5% [23][25] - Canadian Gas segment revenue was $39.8 million, down 2.9% year-over-year, but the segment margin improved to 17.8% from 7.5% [26] - Union Electric segment revenue increased by 7.1% year-over-year to $175.5 million, with a core growth of 32.7% driven by increased bid project activity [26] - Nonunion Electric segment revenue rose by 41.9% year-over-year to $137.1 million, with gross profit increasing to 11.9% from 2.9% [27] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The U.S. Gas segment faced adverse weather conditions impacting performance, but improvements were noted in March and April [19][25] - The nonunion electrical segment benefited from strong market trends in the Sunbelt and Southeast regions, driven by storm damage recovery efforts [20] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on implementing a unified business development strategy to enhance growth and market positioning [11][31] - A significant increase in the sales pipeline was reported, approaching $12 billion in revenue opportunities, with a record booking quarter of $1.2 billion in Q1 2025 [14] - The company aims to improve capital efficiency and reduce working capital levels as part of its strategic priorities [29] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management does not anticipate significant impacts from the global trade war or tariffs in 2025, citing a resilient business model [8][30] - The outlook for full-year 2025 remains unchanged, with expectations to deliver between $2.6 billion and $2.8 billion in revenues [29][30] - Management expressed confidence in maintaining a positive trajectory across segments, with strong growth anticipated in the coming quarters [21][32] Other Important Information - The company has made significant progress in enhancing its pipeline management and sales strategies, fostering a growth-oriented culture [12][31] - Capital expenditures for Q1 2025 were $23.2 million, down from $24.6 million in the prior year [28] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you talk about the trajectory for 2025 and how you expect to reach the upper end of revenue guidance despite a weaker Q1 in U.S. Gas? - Management noted that the gas business faced weather-related challenges in January and February but recovered in March and April, with work under contract supporting the revenue guidance [35][36] Question: Can you discuss the key findings of the strategic review? - Key findings included the need for a fully integrated sales pipeline, improved cross-selling capabilities, a cultural shift towards identifying more work for customers, and aligning KPIs with growth and profitability [38][39][40] Question: How would you frame the loss in the U.S. Gas segment relative to expectations? - Management acknowledged that weather impacts are uncontrollable but emphasized efforts to migrate the business to regions less affected by weather to achieve profitability earlier in the year [45][46] Question: What is the visibility and cadence expected for bookings moving forward? - Management indicated strong visibility for Q2 bookings and anticipated some lumpiness in Q3, with Q4 expected to be robust due to MSA renewals and new bid work [49][51] Question: Can you clarify the guidance for adjusted EBITDA? - Management confirmed that while they are cautious, the bookings and backlog are pushing towards the upper end of the revenue guidance, and they do not foresee margin erosion [55][57] Question: Can you provide details on the new MSAs and their risk profile? - Management stated that the new work aligns with existing services and customers, maintaining the same risk profile without significant changes [60][61] Question: What will be needed to achieve full-year EBITDA margin? - Management indicated that no radical changes are necessary, and they are on track to meet the full-year guidance based on current backlog and expected bookings [67][68]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Consolidated revenues for Q1 2025 totaled $550.1 million, a 4.2% increase from Q1 2024 [22] - Consolidated gross profit was $20.3 million, reflecting a 53.1% increase year-over-year, with a gross profit margin of 3.7% compared to 2.5% in Q1 2024 [22] - Net loss attributable to common stock was $17.9 million, or a diluted loss per share of $0.20, improved from a net loss of $25.1 million or $0.35 per share in the same period last year [23] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 2025 was $24.2 million, approximately 20% higher than the prior year [23] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. Gas segment revenue totaled $197.7 million, a year-over-year decrease of 12.7%, with a gross profit margin declining to -7.5% from -1.8% [24][25] - Canadian Gas segment revenue was $39.8 million, down 2.9% year-over-year, but the segment margin improved to 17.8% from 7.5% [26] - Union Electric segment revenue increased by 7.1% year-over-year to $175.5 million, with core Union Electric segment growth of 32.7% [26] - Nonunion Electric segment revenue rose by 41.9% to $137.1 million, with gross profit margin increasing to 11.9% from 2.9% [27] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The U.S. Gas segment faced adverse weather conditions early in the year but showed improvement in March [20] - The nonunion electrical segment benefited from strong market trends in the Sunbelt and Southeast regions [21] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on implementing a unified business development strategy aimed at high growth pipeline development and securing new awards [12][14] - The sales pipeline is approaching $12 billion in revenue opportunities, with a record booking quarter of $1.2 billion in Q1 2025 [15] - The company aims to enhance capital efficiency and reduce working capital levels to improve free cash flow [29] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management does not anticipate significant impacts from the global trade war or tariffs in 2025, citing a resilient business model [8][30] - The outlook for full-year 2025 remains unchanged, with expectations to deliver between $2.6 billion and $2.8 billion in revenues [29][30] - Management expressed confidence in maintaining a positive trajectory across segments and delivering strong growth in upcoming quarters [22] Other Important Information - The company has made significant progress in enhancing its pipeline management and sales strategies [31] - The first quarter is typically the slowest period due to seasonal winter weather, but the company expects to see improved performance in subsequent quarters [22] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you discuss the trajectory for 2025 despite the weaker Q1 in U.S. Gas? - Management noted that the gas business faced weather-related challenges in January and February but recovered in March and April, with expectations to meet budgeted performance for the year [35][36] Question: What were the key findings of the strategic review? - Key findings included the need for a fully integrated sales pipeline, improved cross-selling capabilities, a cultural shift towards identifying more work for customers, and aligning KPIs with growth and profitability [38][39][40][41] Question: How does the U.S. Gas segment's loss compare to expectations? - Management acknowledged that weather impacts profitability, but efforts are being made to migrate the business to regions less affected by adverse weather [45][46] Question: What is the visibility on bookings moving forward? - Management indicated strong visibility on bookings for Q2 and expects to achieve the 1.1 times book-to-bill target for the full year [48][49] Question: Can you clarify guidance on adjusted EBITDA? - Management confirmed that while they are cautious, the strong bookings and backlog are pushing towards the upper end of revenue guidance, with no expected margin erosion [54][56] Question: What is the risk profile of new MSAs? - Management stated that the new work aligns with existing services and does not change the risk profile, focusing on maintaining the same type of contracts with established customers [58][60] Question: What is the outlook for margins based on the strategic review? - Management indicated that no radical changes are needed to achieve full-year EBITDA margin guidance, as the backlog and expected bookings are on track [65][66]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue for Q1 was $650.7 million, down 5% year over year and 2% sequentially, primarily due to known NEMT contract attrition, lower build hours in PCS, and membership churn in monitoring [20][21] - Net loss for the quarter was $50.4 million, up from $22.3 million a year ago, mainly due to higher interest expense which rose to $38.8 million [21] - Adjusted net loss was $24.5 million or negative $1.71 per share, reflecting the exclusion of restructuring-related costs and amortization of intangibles [21] - Adjusted EBITDA was $32.6 million, essentially flat year over year but down sequentially, with key drivers including an $8 million impact from net NEMT contract development [21][22] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - In NEMT, revenue was $449 million, representing 69% of total revenue, declining 6% year over year due to previously disclosed contract losses [22] - Average monthly members in NEMT declined 19% year over year and 20% sequentially, while utilization from the normalization of healthcare increased to 12% [22] - PCS contributed $181.8 million in revenue or 28% of total revenue, with revenue per hour rising 1.1% while service hours declined 2.1% due to expected seasonality [24] - Monitoring contributed $18.1 million in revenue, representing just 3% of total revenue but 16% of total adjusted EBITDA, with adjusted EBITDA at $5.2 million for a 29% segment margin [25] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The broader opportunity in the 2026 pipeline exceeds $500 million in potential contract value, with the company securing two new Medicaid managed care contracts worth approximately $52 million [6][7] - Retention remains a key performance priority, with four strategic agreements signed in Personal Care expected to generate 90,000 monthly service hours [9] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on five strategic objectives: growing core customer relationships, digitizing and automating the Care Access platform, optimizing the operating model, increasing capital efficiency, and delivering high-impact client-centric supportive care [4][5] - The long-term vision is to become the digital infrastructure for supportive care, unifying fragmented benefits and delivering a coordinated member experience [19] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in improving cash flow generation as contracts are restructured and working capital needs decrease [38] - The company is not issuing formal guidance for 2025 but is focused on executing measurable initiatives and communicating progress through clear KPIs [28] Other Important Information - The company launched a company-wide G&A reduction initiative targeting approximately $25 million in annualized savings [13][14] - The company is in the process of restructuring the organization to build a more tech-first model, adding talent in data, AI, and agile operations [12] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you walk us through how we should be thinking about cash flow generation throughout the rest of the year? - Management indicated that EBITDA is driving cash flow and expects meaningful improvement in cash flow generation as the year progresses, particularly with contract restructuring [32][38] Question: Why did contract receivables increase despite overall revenue decline? - Management explained that the increase in accounts receivable was due to shared risk contracts that had not yet been converted, leading to a disconnect between revenue and receivables [39][40] Question: Is there a positive cash flow possibility in Q3? - Management confirmed that while Q2 and Q4 will see negative cash flows due to large debt payments, they feel good about cash flow generation for the rest of the year [51][53] Question: Can you elaborate on the G&A savings? - Management stated that the $25 million in G&A savings primarily comes from labor reductions in corporate and shared service areas due to increased operational efficiency [56][58]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a net income of $9.1 million or $0.05 per diluted share for Q1 2025, compared to $5.7 million or $0.03 per diluted share in Q4 2024 [19] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 2025 was $46.4 million, down from $50.9 million in Q4 2024, primarily due to lower oil revenue [20] - Revenue for Q1 2025 was $79.1 million, with oil accounting for 97% of total revenue, while total sales volumes were 18,392 BOE per day, exceeding guidance [17][14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company sold 12,074 barrels of oil per day, exceeding the high end of guidance despite weather-related downtime [9] - Seven wells were drilled, completed, and placed on production in Q1 2025, with production from these assets averaging over 2,500 BOE per day in April, representing a 9% increase over initial estimates [10][11] - The acquisition of LimeRock CVP assets added over 40 gross drilling locations to the existing inventory, enhancing production metrics [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The overall realized price increased by 4% to $47.78 per BOE in Q1 2025 from $46.14 per BOE in Q4 2024 [15] - The average crude oil differential from NYMEX WTI futures pricing improved to negative $0.89 per barrel in Q1 2025 from negative $1.42 per barrel in Q4 2024 [16] - The company anticipates a modest reduction in production during the last half of the year, guiding to approximately 2% annual production growth over 2024 [12] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company emphasizes a value-focused strategy aimed at maximizing cash flow generation and maintaining production levels in low price environments [25][26] - Capital spending for 2025 is expected to be reduced by more than 47%, with a focus on debt reduction and maintaining financial flexibility [12][23] - The company is actively pursuing organic growth opportunities in the Central Basin Platform while remaining selective in acquisitions [61][62] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted the high level of oil price volatility and emphasized the importance of maintaining a strong financial position to navigate these challenges [25][28] - The company plans to allocate more cash flow to debt reduction rather than increasing capital spending, even if oil prices recover [27][28] - Management expressed confidence in the production outperformance from new wells and the benefits of the LimeRock acquisition to support future growth [12][28] Other Important Information - The company ended the period with $460 million drawn on its credit facility, with a leverage ratio of 1.9 times [20] - The company has approximately 1.7 million barrels of oil hedged for the last nine months of 2025, providing downside protection at an average price of $64.44 [21] - The company is focusing on acquiring and leasing opportunities in the Central Basin Platform to expand its inventory life [75] Q&A Session Summary Question: Does the company have a leverage target in mind for debt reduction? - Management stated the long-term goal for the leverage ratio is to be comfortably below one, emphasizing the importance of reducing debt in a low price environment [30][32] Question: Will cost improvements affect the capital spending guidance? - Management confirmed that current capital spending forecasts include current prices, and any cost reductions would be directed towards debt repayment rather than increasing project numbers [34][38] Question: What is the state of activity in the Central Basin Platform? - Management noted a mix of interest in the Central Basin Platform, with some larger operators entering the market, while the company remains focused on acquiring undervalued assets [56][60]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company generated $54 million of operating cash flow before working capital, converting it to $39 million of upstream free cash flow, with a capital expenditure (CapEx) of only 35% reinvested into upstream while keeping volumes mostly flat [21] - Debt was reduced by $21 million quarter over quarter, resulting in a leverage ratio of 0.9 times [21] - Average daily net production was 15,620 barrels of oil per day and 24,430 barrels of oil equivalent per day for Q1 2025, with a slight decline in net production from 1.46 million to 1.41 million barrels quarter over quarter, but a 19% increase compared to the same quarter last year [11][12] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company completed 10 wells in Q1 2025, with five wells flowing back and beginning production in May, while the other five will come online in the second half of 2025 [11] - Operating costs were lowered, with lease operating expenses (LOE) per BOE for Q1 2025 at $8.34, a 2% reduction from Q4 2024 and an 8% reduction from the same quarter last year [12] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company noted a 10% compression in many service costs compared to last year, despite potential tariff impacts [13] - The acquisition of Silverback Exploration is expected to enhance the company's long-term upstream development potential and increase its working interest in existing units [6][8] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is prioritizing the acquisition and preservation of high-quality inventory over the conversion of inventory to production, indicating a focus on long-term growth [8] - The strategic acquisition of Silverback Exploration for $142 million in cash is aimed at expanding the company's footprint in New Mexico and enhancing its operational capabilities [5][6] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the company's position to succeed in the current market environment, citing a strong asset base and disciplined capital allocation philosophy [8] - The company anticipates that favorable market conditions will return for bringing on new production, despite current market volatility [26] Other Important Information - The company achieved a total recordable incident rate of zero for Q1 2025, with 93% safe days, marking a record percentage of safe days in a quarter [9][10] - The company is exploring financing alternatives for midstream projects and may reaccelerate project spending based on market conditions [27] Q&A Session Summary Question: What do you think the motivation for the seller was regarding the Silverback acquisition? - The seller was a large private equity firm that often focuses on larger entities, and the asset may have been too small for them [33] Question: Does the larger contiguous acreage position change the scope of your midstream project? - The acquisition supports the decision to invest in infrastructure, and additional gathering and compression may be needed over time [39] Question: What impact could the Silverback assets have on Riley's borrowing base during redetermination? - The PDP value is estimated to be about half of the purchase price, and the company expects some incremental benefit to the borrowing base [46] Question: Can you discuss how you are thinking about hedging downside risk in the current market environment? - The company views hedging as a risk management tool and has laid in some swaps for 2026 to provide clearer cash flow streams [47] Question: Are there any significant permitting differences between power projects in New Mexico versus Texas? - The permitting process is manageable, with some additional costs for air permits in New Mexico [51]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Cotera Energy reported pre-hedge revenues of $2 billion, up from $1.4 billion in the previous quarter, with a significant increase in natural gas price realizations contributing to this growth [21] - The company generated net income of $516 million or $0.68 per share, and adjusted net income of $608 million or $0.80 per share [21] - Discretionary cash flow for the quarter was $1.135 billion, significantly up from $776 million in the prior quarter, while free cash flow was $663 million after cash capital expenditures [22] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Oil production was approximately 2% above the midpoint of guidance, while natural gas production exceeded the high end of guidance [20] - The company reported net turn-in lines of 37 in the Permian, below the guidance midpoint of 40, and zero in the Marcellus as expected [20] - The full-year production guidance remains unchanged despite a slight reduction in capital expenditures [18][24] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is experiencing a modest pullback in activity in the Permian Basin while incrementally adding activity in the Marcellus Shale, resulting in a projected $100 million reduction in 2025 CapEx [11][12] - Natural gas production is expected to average between 2.725 and 2.875 Bcf per day, delivering over 1 Tcf of gas on an annualized basis [27] Company Strategy and Development Direction - Cotera Energy emphasizes flexibility in capital allocation, describing its approach as a "guided missile" that can adapt to changing market conditions [13] - The company is committed to debt reduction, particularly focusing on a $1 billion term loan executed in conjunction with recent acquisitions [14][30] - The strategic focus includes optimizing investment allocation while lowering capital expenditure by $100 million for 2025, maintaining a strong balance sheet to navigate market volatility [24][30] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed concerns regarding the oil outlook but maintained a constructive view on natural gas, indicating a cautious approach to capital spending [11][62] - The company is prepared for potential market volatility and is optimistic about the long-term performance of its diverse asset portfolio [39] - Management highlighted the importance of maintaining a fortress balance sheet to protect shareholder returns and capitalize on market opportunities [30] Other Important Information - The company announced a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share, maintaining one of the highest yielding base dividends in the industry at over 3.4% [29] - The Windom Row project included 73 total wells, with strong performance from Wolfcamp wells, while Harkey wells faced mechanical issues that are being addressed [14][15] Q&A Session Summary Question: Clarification on Harkey shale issues - Management confirmed that the issues were related to cementing and are considered temporary, with remediation steps underway [42][46] Question: Impact on future development plans - Management reassured that the three-year growth plan remains intact and does not foresee significant changes due to the current issues [45][46] Question: Production guidance and ramp-up expectations - Management indicated that the production guidance does not rely on the return of Harkey volumes, with expectations for substantial sequential production increases in the latter half of the year [78][79] Question: Prioritization between buybacks and debt reduction - Management emphasized that debt repayment will be the priority in 2025, while buybacks will be opportunistic and back-end weighted [64][65] Question: Update on Barbara Row development - Management confirmed that Harkey wells have been removed from the current frac schedule, with a focus on Wolfcamp completions [67][68] Question: Natural gas priorities and macro view - Management expressed optimism about the Marcellus program and its growth potential, supported by favorable market conditions [72][73]