INVESTOR DAY Technical Excellence & Disciplined Execution Driving Superior Shareholder Returns January 2026 Unconventional Joey Wong – VP Unconventional Travis Tweit – VP Operations Conventional Chris Bullin – VP Conventional Travis Tweit – VP Operations Summary Grant Fagerheim – President & CEO Thanh Kang – Sr. VP & CFO 2 1 2 AGENDA Who We Are Grant Fagerheim – President & CEO Thanh Kang – Sr. VP & CFO Refer to Slide Notes and Advisories. 3 4 EXECUTIVE VALUE PROPOSITION Our simple, repeatable strategy of d ...

分组1 - Alpha Wealth Funds, LLC reported a return of 4.96% for the Insiders Fund in September 2025, with year-to-date returns reaching 21.37%, outperforming the S&P 500's September return of 3.65% and year-to-date return of 14.83% [1] - The fund highlighted Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) as a key stock, which experienced a one-month return of -1.25% and a 52-week loss of 15.44% [2] - Energy Transfer LP operates as a midstream energy services provider, focusing on the transportation, processing, and exporting of hydrocarbons, with a current dividend yield of 7.7% based on its recent closing price [3] 分组2 - Energy Transfer LP was held by 35 hedge fund portfolios at the end of Q3 2025, a slight decrease from 36 in the previous quarter, indicating a stable interest among hedge funds [4] - Despite the potential of Energy Transfer LP, some analysts suggest that certain AI stocks may offer greater upside potential and lower downside risk [4] - The company was also mentioned in discussions about undervalued stocks, particularly those priced under $20, indicating a focus on value investment opportunities [5]

CORPORATE PRESENTATION Generating Strong Returns Through Commodity Price Cycles January 2026 CORPORATE OVERVIEW 7 ~$14 Billion Market Capitalization 372,500 boe/d 2026 Production Guidance $3.3 Billion 2026 Funds Flow $2.05 Billion 2026 Capital Budget $3.3 Billion Sept. 30th, 2025 Net Debt 1.0x Net Debt / Funds Flow $0.73 per Share Annual Dividend ($0.0608/month) th Largest Canadian Oil & Gas Producer1 2 ~$17 Billion Enterprise Value WHY OWN WHITECAP 5 th Largest Canadian Natural Gas Producer2 2 Refer to Sli ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the importance of preparing for retirement and highlights the best energy stocks for retirement portfolios, emphasizing the need for thoughtful investment strategies to ensure financial stability during retirement [2][4][6]. Retirement Preparedness - A study from Vanguard indicates that only 40% of workers aged 61 to 65 are financially aligned with their retirement goals, suggesting a significant portion may face income shortfalls [2][3]. - The median individual in this age group is projected to have a yearly income gap of about $9,000, which is approximately 24% below the required amount to maintain their lifestyle in retirement [3]. Investment Strategies - Dividend-paying stocks are favored by many investors for retirement portfolios due to their historical performance and lower volatility compared to the broader market [4][5]. - The energy sector is noted for its strong commitment to dividends, with an annual underlying dividend growth rate of 3% reported by Janus Henderson, and total dividends paid in 2024 reaching $166.2 billion, up from $118.9 billion in 2018 [5]. Best Energy Stocks - The article outlines a methodology for selecting the best energy stocks, focusing on companies with consistent dividend growth over the past decade, an annual dividend yield exceeding 3%, and stock gains of at least 20% over the same period [8]. - The selection process also considers the number of hedge funds invested in these stocks, as following top hedge fund picks has historically led to market outperformance [9]. Company Highlights - **Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE:EPD)**: Recognized as a leading North American midstream energy service provider, it has 26 hedge fund holders. Recent analyst updates include a price target increase from $33 to $34 by Morgan Stanley, while JPMorgan downgraded its rating from 'Overweight' to 'Neutral' [10][11][12]. - **Enbridge Inc. (NYSE:ENB)**: This midstream energy operator has 27 hedge fund holders and recently increased its quarterly dividend by 2.9% to C$0.97 per share, marking 31 consecutive years of dividend growth. The company forecasts a distributable cash flow of C$5.70 – C$6.10 per share for FY 2026, reflecting a 4% increase from previous guidance [13][14][15][16][17].

Summary of ONEOK Conference Call Company Overview - **Company**: ONEOK - **Key Executives Present**: - Pierce Norton, President and CEO - Walt Hulse, EVP and Chief Financial Officer - Sheridan Swords, EVP, Chief Commercial Officer Strategic Shifts - ONEOK has undergone significant strategic shifts over the past few years, diversifying its pipeline concentration and reducing natural gas exposure while increasing its presence in refined products and crude NGLs [3][4][6] - The acquisition of Magellan was pivotal, transitioning from a supply push to a demand pull model, enhancing cash flow stability and allowing for sustained earnings with minimal capital [4][5] - Subsequent acquisitions, including EnLink and Medallion, were strategically sequenced to enhance connectivity and operational efficiency across their assets [5][6] Synergies and Financial Performance - ONEOK has identified $700 million to $1.1 billion in synergies from its acquisitions, with approximately 80% of expected synergies from the Magellan acquisition already realized [8][9] - The company has successfully executed small capital projects yielding high returns, such as spending $12 million to generate $30 million in EBITDA [9][10] - The integration of assets has allowed for improved operational control and efficiency, particularly in the NGL system [11][12] Market Outlook - The U.S. is projected to produce approximately 13.5 million barrels of oil daily, with significant growth expected in the Permian Basin, which will drive natural gas and liquids production [15][41] - The LNG capacity in the Gulf Coast is expected to reach 30 BCF per day by 2030, indicating a strong demand for natural gas from regions like the Permian and Haynesville [15][16] - The Bakken region is anticipated to see low single-digit growth in gas production, while the Rockies are expected to maintain stable crude oil production levels [18][20] Capital Expenditure and Growth Drivers - ONEOK's growth into 2026 is driven by completed projects and expansions, including the Bison Pipeline and Denver expansion of refined products pipeline [30][31] - The company has adjusted its outlook for 2026 due to a decrease in crude prices from $75 to $60, leading to a more cautious approach from producers [32][33] M&A Strategy - ONEOK remains open to M&A opportunities but is currently in a position to be patient and selective, having built a strong asset mix and identified potential targets [34][35] - The company emphasizes intentionality in its M&A strategy, ensuring that any future acquisitions align with its existing operational framework [35] Competitive Landscape - The wellhead-to-water strategy aims to control the entire process from gas production to market delivery, enhancing competitive positioning [36][39] - The Permian Basin is recognized as the most competitive area for natural gas and NGLs, with ongoing investments in pipeline and fractionation capacity [52][53] Conclusion - ONEOK is strategically positioned for growth through its diversified asset base, successful integration of acquisitions, and a strong focus on operational efficiency and market demand dynamics. The company is prepared to navigate the evolving energy landscape while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation and M&A activities.

Core Insights - Gunvor Group has transitioned to full employee ownership through a buy-out, ending Torbjörn Törnqvist's majority shareholding and appointing Gary Pedersen as the new CEO [1][2] Company Transition - The buy-out transforms Gunvor into an entirely employee-owned enterprise, eliminating external shareholders and aiming for a "definitive reset" to improve its reputation [2] - The leadership's buy-out concept was first introduced at a 2022 all-hands retreat, focusing on continuity and internal control as part of the long-term strategy [2] Leadership Changes - Gary Pedersen, a 30-year trading veteran, will lead the company globally while splitting his time between Geneva and Houston [3] - Pedersen's background includes experience with Koch Industries and Millennium Management, particularly in refined products and logistics across multiple regions [3] Financial Position and Growth Strategy - Gunvor is financially strong and aims to expand globally, with a focus on U.S. opportunities alongside its existing European and Asian operations [4] - The company is shifting towards an investment-led growth model, emphasizing diversification across the energy supply chain [5] Governance Changes - The buy-out will result in significant governance changes, including the exit of the Törnqvist family from the Board of Directors and Executive Committee [5] - A new leadership structure is expected to be announced soon, aimed at streamlining decision-making and aligning ownership with management [5] Industry Context - Gunvor joins a select group of privately held global trading houses with employee ownership, which is viewed as a strategic advantage in the volatile commodity markets [6] - The transition occurs amid increasing scrutiny on energy traders regarding transparency and governance, suggesting that internal consolidation may provide stability [6]

Core Insights - Range Resources reported strong Q3 2025 earnings, with adjusted earnings of 57 cents per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 50 cents and improving from 48 cents in the prior year [2] - Total revenues for the quarter reached $717.6 million, exceeding the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $691 million and up from $680.2 million year-over-year [2] Operational Performance - Average production was 2,227.8 million cubic feet equivalent per day (Mcfe/d), slightly higher than the previous year's 2,204.5 Mcfe/d but below the projected 2,256.4 Mcfe/d [4] - Natural gas constituted approximately 69% of total production, with a 2% year-over-year increase, while oil production decreased by 7% and NGL output fell by 1% [4] Price Realization - Total price realization averaged $2.98 per Mcfe, a 13% increase year-over-year, and higher than the estimated $2.95 per Mcfe [5] - Natural gas prices rose by 51% year-over-year to $2.56 per Mcf, while NGL and oil prices fell by 15% to $22.09 per barrel and $54.25 per barrel, respectively [5] Costs & Expenses - Total costs and expenses increased by 3% year-over-year to $565.2 million, slightly below the expected $566.6 million [6] - Transportation, gathering, processing, and compression costs decreased to $301 million from $306 million in the prior year, while depreciation, depletion, and amortization expenses rose to $93.8 million from $91.1 million [6] Capital Expenditure & Balance Sheet - Drilling and completion expenditures totaled $165 million, with an additional $16 million on acreage and $9 million on infrastructure and upgrades [7] - Total debt at the end of Q3 was reported at $1,216.8 million, net of deferred financing costs [7] Outlook - Range Resources updated its total production forecast for 2025 to approximately 2.23 billion cubic feet equivalent per day, with over 30% attributed to liquids production [8] - The capital budget for the year is expected to be between $650 million and $680 million [8] Estimate Trends - Since the earnings release, there has been a downward trend in fresh estimates, with the consensus estimate shifting down by 8.61% [9][10] - Range Resources currently holds a Zacks Rank 3 (Hold), indicating an expectation of in-line returns in the coming months [12] Industry Performance - Range Resources is part of the Zacks Oil and Gas - Exploration and Production - United States industry, where EQT Corporation has seen a 13.9% gain over the past month [13] - EQT reported revenues of $1.75 billion for the last quarter, reflecting a year-over-year increase of 26.7%, with an EPS of $0.52 compared to $0.12 a year ago [14]

Group 1: Company Overview - Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) operates as a midstream major with a pipeline network exceeding 50,000 miles, transporting various energy products [5] - HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) primarily functions as a refinery operator with facilities across several states including Wyoming and Oklahoma [10] Group 2: Performance Comparison - Over the past year, HF Sinclair's stock has increased by 33.6%, while Enterprise Products has only gained 6.1% [2] Group 3: Business Outlook and Valuations - Enterprise Products is expected to generate additional cash flows from ongoing capital projects valued at $5.1 billion, including the Mentone West 2 and Athena projects [6][8] - EPD trades at a higher EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.60X compared to DINO's 6.37X, indicating a market premium for Enterprise Products [14] Group 4: Market Conditions - HF Sinclair is optimistic about the refining business environment, supported by high utilization rates and low product inventories, particularly in distillates [10][12] - The company is positioned to benefit from rising prices of jet fuel and diesel due to a supply-demand imbalance in distillates [12] Group 5: Investment Considerations - Risk-averse investors may prefer Enterprise Products for its stability, while those willing to take risks might favor HF Sinclair for its potential higher margins [13] - Both companies currently hold a Zacks Rank 3 (Hold) [16]

Core Insights - Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) is a leading midstream player with a robust pipeline network exceeding 50,000 miles, providing stability against oil and natural gas price volatility [1] - EPD is positioned to enhance cash flows through $5.1 billion in major capital projects currently under construction, including the Mentone West 2 and Athena projects [2][3] Group 1: Capital Projects - The Mentone West 2 project is a natural gas processing plant in Delaware with a capacity of 300 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), expected to be operational by the first half of 2026 [3] - The Athena project, located in Midland, also has a processing capacity of 300 MMcf/d [3] Group 2: Industry Comparison - Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) has a growth capital backlog of $9.3 billion, while Enbridge Inc. (ENB) has secured capital projects worth C$35 billion, indicating a strong position for both companies to generate additional cash flows [4] Group 3: Price Performance and Valuation - EPD units have appreciated by 4.1% over the past year, contrasting with a 10.8% decline in the broader industry [5][7] - EPD's trailing 12-month enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio stands at 10.45X, slightly below the industry average of 10.47X [8]

Core Insights - President Trump's tariff strategy has unevenly impacted the oil and gas sector, with crude oil and refined fuel imports exempt from tariffs, while upstream and midstream companies face rising costs from tariffs on materials like steel and aluminum [2][19][20] Equipment Costs and Supply Chains - Cost inflation on equipment and materials is a significant issue, with steel being the primary factor affecting various infrastructure components [4][19] - Tariffs are expected to add 2-5% to offshore project costs, leading to delays or renegotiations of capital plans [5] Impact of Tariffs on Crude Oil and Refined Products - Crude oil, LNG, NGLs, gasoline, and diesel are exempt from the new tariff structure, which helps maintain competitive supply chains for U.S. refineries [6][19] - A potential tariff on crude oil could severely disrupt refinery economics, particularly for Gulf Coast refineries that rely on imported heavy crudes [9][12] Economic Consequences of Tariffs - A 10-25% tariff on imported crude could lead to significant profitability losses for refineries optimized for foreign grades, resulting in higher fuel prices at the pump [10][14] - The U.S. could lose market share in refined product exports due to increased production costs from tariffs [15] Strategic Implications - The current tariff environment has already impacted U.S. oil and gas, and any future changes to crude oil tariff exemptions could have immediate and widespread consequences [18][20] - The industry is currently absorbing indirect costs from tariffs, which could shift dramatically if crude oil is added to the tariff schedule [19][20] Conclusion - Trump's tariff policy has created a dichotomy in the energy economy, preserving the supply chains for crude oil and refined products while increasing costs for the infrastructure necessary to support the industry [19][21]