NEW YORK, Dec. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading international securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Integer, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/int ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CarMax, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1]. Company Overview - CarMax, Inc. is a company that sells used cars and has recently faced legal challenges due to allegations of misleading investors regarding demand for its vehicles [4]. Financial Performance - CarMax reported disappointing financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, including a 5.4% decline in retail used unit sales, a 6.3% decline in comparable store used unit sales, and a 2.2% decline in wholesale units [6]. - The company posted a net income of approximately $95.4 million for Q2, down from $132.8 million in the previous year [6]. Stock Performance - Following the announcement of disappointing financial results on September 25, 2025, CarMax's stock price dropped by $11.45 per share, or roughly 20%, from $57.05 to $45.60 [7]. - An unexpected departure of CEO Bill Nash on November 6, 2025, along with a weak preliminary Q3 outlook, led to an additional stock price drop of over 24% [7]. Legal Proceedings - Investors have until January 2, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the class action case, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland [3]. - The lawsuit asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in CarMax securities [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. and its senior executives for securities fraud, following significant stock drops attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Stride, Inc. is an education technology company that provides an online platform to students across the U.S. [4]. Allegations and Stock Impact - The lawsuit alleges that Stride inflated enrollment numbers by retaining "ghost students," ignored compliance requirements, and had a poor customer experience leading to higher withdrawal rates and lower conversion rates [4]. - On September 14, 2025, a report of fraud and deceptive practices caused Stride's stock to drop by $18.60 per share, over 11%, from $158.36 to $139.76 [5]. - Following an admission of poor customer experience on October 28, 2025, Stride's stock plummeted by $83.48 per share, more than 54%, from $153.53 to $70.05 [6]. Legal Proceedings - Investors have until January 12, 2026, to request to lead the case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under the case caption MacMahon v. Stride, Inc., et al. [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop due to potential violations of federal securities laws [1]. Company Overview - Inspire Medical Systems develops and manufactures an implantable medical device for the treatment of sleep apnea, with the latest version being Inspire V, which received FDA approval on August 2, 2024 [4]. Allegations and Issues - The lawsuit claims that Inspire misled investors by assuring them that all necessary steps were taken for the launch of Inspire V, which was supposed to meet high demand [5]. - Contrary to these assurances, Inspire allegedly failed to prepare clinicians and payors adequately, leading to significant delays in the device's adoption and weak demand due to customers having excess inventory of older devices [6]. Stock Performance and Impact - On August 4, 2025, Inspire disclosed that the launch of Inspire V would face an "elongated timeframe," resulting in a reduction of its 2025 earnings per share guidance by over 80% [7]. - Following this announcement, Inspire's stock price dropped by $42.04 per share, or more than 32%, from $129.95 on August 4, 2025, to $87.91 on August 5, 2025 [8].

Core Viewpoint - BellRing Brands, Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws, with concerns regarding the sustainability of its sales growth driven by temporary inventory loading rather than genuine consumer demand [1][2]. Company Overview - BellRing Brands operates in the convenient nutrition category, primarily known for its brands Premier Protein and Dymatize, which offer ready-to-drink protein shakes and powders [2]. Sales Performance - The company reported that Premier Protein achieved an all-time high in household penetration and strong demand across all channels, attributed to distribution expansion and promotional activities [2]. - However, the actual sales growth may have been artificially inflated due to temporary trade inventory loading at key retailers, raising questions about the sustainability of this growth [2]. Stock Market Reaction - On May 5, 2025, BellRing disclosed that several key retailers reduced their inventory levels, which would negatively impact growth in Q3 2025. Following this announcement, the stock price dropped by $13.96, or over 18%, from $77.34 to $63.38 per share [3]. - On August 4, 2025, the company reported disappointing quarterly consumption figures for Premier Protein RTD Shakes, leading to a further decline in stock price by $17.46, or nearly 33%, from $53.64 to $36.18 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - A shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit against F5, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations regarding the company's security capabilities during the period from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired F5 securities within the specified timeframe [1]. - Defendants are accused of making misrepresentations about F5's security capabilities [2]. - Investors interested in joining the class action must file papers by February 17, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Bernstein Liebhard LLP has a history of recovering over $3.5 billion for clients and has represented both individual investors and large pension funds [4]. - The firm has been recognized multiple times for its success in litigating class actions [4].

NEW YORK, Dec. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP announces that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors (the “Class”) who purchased or acquired the securities of SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (“SLM” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: SLM) between July 25, 2025 and August 14, 2025, inclusive. Should You Join This Class Action Lawsuit? Do you, or did you, own shares of SLM Corporation (NASDAQ: SLM)?Did you purchase your shares between July 25, 2025 and Aug ...

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 10, 2025 IPO, alleging that the offering documents were misleading regarding the company's financial risks and loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Nayak v. Klarna Group plc, claims that Klarna and its executives violated the Securities Act of 1933 [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Klarna's IPO documents failed to disclose that the company materially understated the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [3]. - Klarna's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - Following the IPO, Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million on November 18, 2025, as it increased provisions for potentially souring loans [4]. - Provisions for loan losses were reported at $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million, and represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, up from 0.44% the previous year [4]. - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, Klarna's stock price had fallen to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Representation - Investors who purchased Klarna securities can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, which allows them to act on behalf of other class members [5]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to represent the class, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in securing monetary relief for investors in securities class action cases for four out of the last five years [6].

Core Viewpoint - The F5 class action lawsuit alleges that F5, Inc. and certain executives misled investors regarding the company's revenue outlook and growth potential, while downplaying risks associated with a significant security incident that impacted the company's operations and stock performance [3][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that F5 created a false impression of having reliable information about its projected revenue and growth, while minimizing risks from seasonality and macroeconomic factors [3]. - On October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed a security breach involving a nation-state threat actor, leading to a nearly 14% drop in stock price over two trading days [4]. - Following the release of its fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results on October 27, 2025, which included significantly below-market growth expectations for fiscal 2026 due to the security breach, F5's stock fell nearly 11% over two trading days [5]. Group 2: Company Overview - F5 is a global multi-cloud application security and delivery company that enables customers to deploy, secure, and operate applications both on-premises and via public cloud [2]. - The company's highest revenue product, BIG-IP, was directly affected by the security breach, which has led to expected reductions in sales and renewals, elongated sales cycles, and increased expenses for remediation efforts [5]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased F5 securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [6]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm to litigate the case [6]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in securing monetary relief for investors in securities class action cases for four out of the last five years [7].

Core Viewpoint - The SLM Corporation, also known as Sallie Mae, is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misrepresented its financial stability and the effectiveness of its loan programs during a period of increasing delinquencies [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors in SLM securities from July 25, 2025, to August 14, 2025, can seek appointment as lead plaintiff by February 17, 2026 [1]. - The lawsuit, titled Zappia v. SLM Corporation, accuses SLM and its executives of making false statements and failing to disclose significant increases in early-stage delinquencies [3][4]. - On August 14, 2025, a report from TD Cowen indicated that July 2025 delinquencies rose by 49 basis points month-over-month, contradicting SLM's claims of normal seasonal trends [4]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit alleges that SLM overstated the effectiveness of its loss mitigation and loan modification programs, leading to a misrepresentation of the overall stability of its private education loan delinquency rates [3]. - Following the TD Cowen report, SLM's stock price dropped by approximately 8%, reflecting investor reaction to the disclosed delinquency issues [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who suffered losses during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status, which involves directing the lawsuit on behalf of all class members [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm representing the investors, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].