Democracy
Search documents
Stacey Abrams on Trump 1.0 vs. Trump 2.0
MSNBC· 2025-09-14 21:59
Political Analysis - The report suggests a shift from "Trump 1.0%" which aimed to weaponize democracy, to "Trump 2.0%" with an agenda to dismantle democracy [1] - The analysis outlines a multi-step process towards autocracy, starting with a free and fair election as the last one [1] - It involves exceeding executive power, potentially breaking the law [2] - Weakening competing powers, including a complicit Congress and a judiciary that won't intervene, is a key step [3] - Gutting the government to break the connection between the people and democracy is also highlighted [3][4] Governance Concerns - The report raises concerns about the abuse of executive power and the weakening of checks and balances [2][3] - It suggests a judiciary, specifically the Supreme Court, may be unwilling to stop the president, potentially rebuking the Constitution [3] - The analysis emphasizes the importance of government delivering for the people to maintain trust and support for democracy [4]
Brazil delivers a lesson in democracy America can’t ignore
MSNBC· 2025-09-14 18:36
The story of democracy is always to be continued. That may be the only thing we can say about democracy with any certainty. It's never a story with a neat beginning or a tidy ending.Democracy is often fragile, imperfect, imperfect, and alive thing that must be nurtured and defended every single day. The presidential historian John Mechum captured that truth powerfully when he reminded us that democracy is a work in progress because we ourselves are a work in progress. quote, "A democracy is the fullest expr ...
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-09-13 19:40
Politicians already know their jobs come with death threats and get on with their work anyway. But such violence will surely put people off serving their country or taking a full part in their democracy https://t.co/zXcf4NYGxu ...
Supreme Court greenlights racial profiling, shreds the Fourth Amendment
MSNBC· 2025-09-13 19:20
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights - The Supreme Court's decision allows federal agents to racially profile individuals during immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, potentially violating the Fourth Amendment [1][9] - The Fourth Amendment, designed to protect against unreasonable searches and seizures, is being undermined by the court's ruling, raising concerns about government overreach [2][7][10] - Justice Sotomayor dissented, arguing against a society where individuals are targeted based on ethnicity and appearance [12] - The ruling suggests that constitutional protections are conditional and can be disregarded based on perceived immigration status [13][18] - The Supreme Court's use of the "shadow docket" to issue the decision without oral arguments or explanation raises concerns about transparency and accountability [11][25] Societal Impact & Legal Precedent - The decision normalizes racial profiling and potentially creates a police state where constitutional rights are diminished [23][24] - The ruling could weaken constitutional protections for all individuals, not just specific groups [24] - The Supreme Court's actions are perceived as abandoning basic constitutional principles and granting the government excessive discretion [19] - The decision is seen as part of a series of rulings that approve actions violating the Constitution [22] - The ruling may damage the Supreme Court's legacy and undermine democracy for generations [27]
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-09-13 11:40
Britain isn’t the only democracy where the centre is crumbling. But the difference is that Sir Keir Starmer still has a commanding parliamentary majority. He must use it https://t.co/GCEVqpJq1S ...
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-13 10:48
For two decades now, African governments have been snapping up Chinese surveillance tech, narrowing the space for democracy and civil society https://t.co/yAWkjoNGLc ...
Michael: 'Brazil’s Supreme Court upholds the rule of law – in America, it doesn’t matter'
MSNBC· 2025-09-13 00:55
Political & Legal Analysis - Brazilian Supreme Court convicted former President Bolsonaro for conspiring against democracy and attempting a coup after his 2022 election defeat, sentencing him to 27 years in prison [1][2] - The conviction highlights a contrast with the US, where Donald Trump faced less accountability for similar actions [1] - Rubio criticized the Brazilian Supreme Court's actions as "political persecutions" and a "witch hunt," indicating support for Bolsonaro from some US political figures [5] - The US administration imposed 50% tariffs on Brazil, impacting the coffee industry, allegedly in response to actions against Bolsonaro [10] Geopolitical Implications - The events in Brazil are significant due to Brazil's status as a major global power, and they offer a comparison to the January 6th events in the US [8] - The US President has criticized accountability efforts in Brazil and has reportedly retaliated against those holding Bolsonaro accountable [9] Social & Ideological Factors - Former President Bolsonaro maintains significant support in Brazil, particularly among evangelicals and conservative individuals, indicating continued polarization [3] - The conviction is seen as sending a message of accountability, contrasting with a perceived lack of accountability in the US [7][11]
Rev. Al Sharpton: 'Political violence has to stop'
MSNBC· 2025-09-12 00:43
Right now, the FBI is trying to track down the shooter who killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk. While authorities in Utah work to uncover a motive, they are calling this a targeted attack. An attack against a prominent political figure on an American college campus.This heinous attack comes against the backdrop of a nation, folks, that's reeling from a spike in political violence. In a new column for uh MSNBC. com, Simone writes, quote, "Democracy cannot function under fear. The constitutional promise ...
Bridging divide amid rising political violence
MSNBC· 2025-09-11 19:54
Core Message - Bridge USA's mission is to empower young people to bridge their differences over politics through constructive dialogue [1][5] - The organization has 95 chapters across college campuses and is seeing active engagement in discourse [5] - A new counterculture is emerging on America's college campuses that stands firmly against intolerance and believes in curiosity [7] - Dialogue and conversation are becoming the underdog, suggesting a shift in societal values [15] Dialogue & Democracy - Open dialogue is essential for a functioning democracy [6] - The inability to talk to each other could lead to societal breakdown, referencing the American Civil War [16] - Violence is likened to poison gas, emphasizing its uncontrollable and harmful effects [12] Challenges & Solutions - Social media can be a barrier to open dialogue due to the "tyranny of the loudest voices" [9] - Reinstating trust is critical for fostering conversation [10] - The American people are ready for dialogue and are exhausted by conflict, with young people leading the way [8]
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-09-05 18:35
Political Analysis - Democrats are perceived as failing to forcefully stand up to President Trump [1] - The podcast questions Democrats' ability to check the president's power, impacting their perceived worthiness to govern [1]