Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against PayPal Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making materially false statements and failing to disclose adverse facts about its business and operations during the specified class period [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 25, 2025, to February 2, 2026, and investors have until April 20, 2026, to file for lead plaintiff status [2][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that PayPal misrepresented its projected revenue outlook and growth potential, creating a false impression of stability and minimizing risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic fluctuations [4][6]. Group 2: Stock Performance - PayPal's stock price dropped by $10.63, or 20.3%, closing at $41.70 per share on February 3, 2026, following a surprise leadership change and disappointing earnings report that missed consensus estimates for revenue and profit [5]. Group 3: Investor Actions - Investors can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiffs or choose to remain absent class members, with the lead plaintiff representing the interests of all class members [6][8]. - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP offers free case evaluations and operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning there is no cost to the investor unless the case is won [7][10].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of On Holding AG regarding possible recovery of investor losses under federal securities laws following a significant organizational change within the company [1][4]. Group 1: Company Announcement - On March 25, 2026, On Holding announced an update to its organizational structure, revealing that co-founders David Allemann and Caspar Coppetti will serve as Co-CEOs, Scott Maguire was promoted to President & COO, and Martin Hoffmann will step down as CEO effective May 1, 2026 [3]. - Following the announcement of the organizational changes, the price of On Holding stock declined [3]. Group 2: Investigation Details - Johnson Fistel is investigating whether On Holding complied with federal securities laws in light of the recent organizational changes and the subsequent decline in stock price [4]. - Investors who suffered losses from their investment in On Holding stock are encouraged to contact Johnson Fistel for potential claims [2][4]. Group 3: About Johnson Fistel - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder-rights law firm with multiple offices across the United States, representing both individual and institutional investors in securities class action lawsuits [5]. - The firm has been recognized for its effectiveness in advocating for investors, having recovered approximately $90.725 million for clients in previous cases [6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Trip.com Group Limited (NASDAQ: TCOM) for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and regulatory risks during the class period from April 30, 2024, to January 13, 2026 [2][4]. Summary by Relevant Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, under the case name De Wilde v. Trip.com Group Limited, et al, Case No. 1:26-cv-01420 (E.D.N.Y.) [2]. - Investors have until May 11, 2026, to file for lead plaintiff status [2][7]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that Trip.com failed to disclose significant regulatory risks associated with its monopolistic business practices, which misled investors about the company's true operational status [4]. - Specific allegations include that Trip.com understated the regulatory risks and that positive statements made by the company lacked a reasonable basis [4]. Stock Price Impact - Following a Bloomberg article on January 14, 2026, which reported that China was investigating Trip.com for alleged antitrust conduct, the company's stock price dropped by $12.90 per share, approximately 17.05%, closing at $62.78 [5]. Investor Actions - Investors who purchased Trip.com securities and incurred losses are encouraged to contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP for potential recovery options at no cost [3][7]. - The lead plaintiff process allows investors to seek representation in the lawsuit, with a deadline of May 11, 2026, to file for lead plaintiff status [9].

Core Viewpoint - Grocery Outlet Holdings Corp. is facing a securities fraud class action lawsuit due to allegations of unsustainable growth and rapid store expansion leading to financial underperformance [4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased securities from August 5, 2025, to March 4, 2026, alleging that the company expanded too quickly and could not achieve sustainable growth [4]. - Allegations include that the company's financial growth was artificially supported by excessive store expansion and that a restructuring plan would require significant store closures and asset write-downs [4]. Group 2: Financial Performance - For the fiscal year 2025, Grocery Outlet reported adjusted EBITDA of $254.3 million, net sales of $4.69 billion, and diluted adjusted earnings per share of $0.76, all missing prior guidance [5]. - The company announced an "optimization plan" in addition to its restructuring plan, which includes closing 36 underperforming stores and recognizing $110 million in non-cash impairment charges [5]. - Following the announcement, Grocery Outlet's share price dropped by approximately 27.9%, from $8.79 to $6.34 per share [5].

Core Viewpoint - Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with significant financial losses reported during the class period from November 5, 2025, to February 26, 2026 [1][3]. Company Overview - Eos Energy designs, manufactures, and markets zinc-based battery energy storage systems aimed at utility-scale commercial and industrial applications [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Eos Energy made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose critical operational issues, including: - Inability to achieve production ramp-up and capacity utilization as per guidance [3]. - Battery line downtime exceeding industry norms and internal forecasts [3]. - Delays in automated bipolar production quality targets [3]. - Inadequate systems preventing accurate guidance and timely disclosures [3]. Financial Performance - On February 26, 2026, Eos Energy reported its fourth quarter and full year 2025 results, revealing: - Full year 2025 revenue of $114.2 million, significantly below the guidance of $150 million to $160 million [4]. - A gross loss of $143.8 million and a net loss attributable to shareholders of $969.6 million [4]. - An adjusted EBITDA loss of $219.1 million and a capacity milestone reached five weeks later than planned [4]. - Following this announcement, Eos Energy's stock price fell by over 39% [4]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Eos Energy securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [5].

Core Viewpoint - Investors who suffered losses in Hercules Capital, Inc. have the opportunity to lead a securities fraud class action lawsuit against the company due to alleged misrepresentations and failures in due diligence processes [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that between May 1, 2025, and February 27, 2026, Hercules Capital failed to disclose that it overstated the due diligence in its deal sourcing and loan origination processes [3]. - The complaint also claims that the company misrepresented its portfolio valuations and reported misclassified portfolio investments, leading to materially misleading statements about its business and operations [3]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors interested in participating in the class action lawsuit must contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith before May 19, 2026, which is the lead plaintiff deadline [2][4]. - Individuals do not need to take any action at this time to be a member of the class action and may choose to retain counsel or remain an absent member [5].

Core Viewpoint - Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP has initiated an investigation into ADMA Biologics for potential violations of federal securities laws following a report from a short seller alleging that the company's reported 20% revenue growth in 2025 was artificially inflated through a channel stuffing scheme [1][2][3]. Company Overview - ADMA Biologics is a biopharmaceutical company focused on manufacturing and developing specialty biologics, with its flagship product being ASCENIV, a liquid immune globulin solution for treating Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency in adults and adolescents [2]. Allegations and Investigation Details - The investigation centers on claims that ADMA Biologics' reported revenue growth was misleading, as it allegedly engaged in channel stuffing by incentivizing a distributor to stock excess ASCENIV, which allowed the company to report growth that did not reflect actual demand [3]. - According to the report by Culper Research, without the alleged channel stuffing, ADMA Biologics would have experienced a revenue decline of 3% in 2025 instead of the reported 20% growth [3]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the publication of the short seller report, ADMA Biologics' stock price fell by $3.96 per share, representing a 29% decline, from $13.59 on March 23, 2026, to $9.63 on March 25, 2026 [4].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action has been filed against Trip.com Group Limited, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from April 30, 2024, to January 13, 2026, leading to significant investor losses [2][6]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Trip.com failed to disclose material adverse facts, particularly regarding an investigation by Chinese authorities into alleged antitrust conduct [6]. - On January 14, 2026, it was reported that the State Administration for Market Regulation accused Trip.com of monopolistic practices, resulting in a stock price drop of $12.90, or 17.05%, closing at $62.78 per share [6]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP is encouraging affected investors to contact them for potential claims, emphasizing their experience in securities litigation and class action cases [3][7]. - Investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the class period may pursue claims without upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [5].

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, today announced that it has commenced an investigation on behalf of Coty Inc. ("Coty†or the "Company†) (NYSE: COTY) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of the federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON COTY INC. (COTY), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Happened? On February 5, 2026, Coty. ...

Core Viewpoint - ODDITY Tech Ltd. is facing a securities fraud lawsuit due to significant financial losses attributed to issues with its largest advertising partner, leading to a drastic decline in stock price and expected revenue [2][3]. Financial Performance - On February 25, 2026, ODDITY reported a 30% year-over-year decline in expected revenue for Q1 2026, primarily due to increased user acquisition costs resulting from algorithm changes by its largest advertising partner [2][3]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the financial disclosure, ODDITY's stock price plummeted by $14.28, or 49.2%, closing at $14.74 per share on February 25, 2026, which significantly impacted investors [3]. Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit alleges that ODDITY's management made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business operations and financial health, failing to disclose the adverse effects of the advertising partner's algorithm changes [3][4].