Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Skye Bioscience, Inc. due to alleged securities fraud affecting investors between November 4, 2024, and October 3, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The complaint alleges that the defendants made false statements regarding the effectiveness of the Company's lead product candidate, nimacimab, which was claimed to be less effective than represented [2]. - It is asserted that the clinical, regulatory, and commercial prospects of nimacimab were overstated, leading to materially false and misleading public statements by the defendants [2]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until January 16, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Legal Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between July 25, 2024, and October 22, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Integer Holdings Corporation materially overstated its competitive position in the electrophysiology manufacturing market [2]. - It is alleged that despite claims of strong visibility into customer demand, the company was experiencing a sustained deterioration in sales related to two of its electrophysiology devices [2]. - The complaint further asserts that Integer mischaracterized its electrophysiology devices as a long-term growth driver for its cardio & vascular segment, leading to materially false and misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the relevant time frame have until February 9, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a track record of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is investigating potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws involving Ardent Health, Inc., focusing on whether the company and its executives made false or misleading statements or failed to disclose material information to investors [1][2]. Company Overview - Ardent Health, Inc. is a healthcare provider operating in growing midsize urban communities across the United States [2]. - The company raised $192 million in its initial public offering on July 18, 2024, selling 12 million shares at $16 per share [2]. Recent Developments - On November 12, 2025, Ardent Health announced its third quarter 2025 earnings, which missed consensus estimates primarily due to pronounced payor denials and a $54 million adjustment related to adverse prior period claim developments from 2019 to 2022 [3]. - The CFO, Alfred Lumsdaine, indicated that a "change in accounting estimate" led to the earlier recognition of reserves, resulting in a revenue reduction of $43 million for the quarter [3].

Core Viewpoint - The F5 class action lawsuit alleges that F5, Inc. and its executives misled investors regarding the company's revenue outlook and growth potential, particularly in light of a significant security incident that impacted its operations and stock price [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled Smith v. F5, Inc., No. 25-cv-02619 (W.D. Wash.) and aims to represent purchasers or acquirers of F5 securities [1]. - The lawsuit claims that F5 created a false impression of its financial health and minimized risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [4]. - On October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed a security breach involving a nation-state threat actor, leading to a nearly 14% drop in stock price over two trading days [5]. - Following the breach, F5 reported fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results that fell significantly below market expectations, resulting in an additional nearly 11% decline in stock price over two trading days [6]. Group 2: Company Background - F5 is described as a global multi-cloud application security and delivery company, enabling customers to deploy, secure, and operate applications both on-premises and via public cloud [3]. - The company's flagship product, BIG-IP, was notably affected by the security breach, which is also its highest revenue-generating product [6]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased F5 securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [7]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor with the greatest financial interest in the case and acts on behalf of all class members [7]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in securing monetary relief for investors in securities class action cases for four out of the last five years [8].

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 10, 2025 IPO, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 due to misleading offering documents and understated risks associated with its loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Nayak v. Klarna Group plc and was filed in the Eastern District of New York [1]. - Investors who purchased Klarna securities during the IPO have until February 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's IPO documents were materially false and omitted critical information regarding the company's financial risks [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Allegations - Klarna's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [2]. - Following the IPO, Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million and increased provisions for loan losses to $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [4]. - Provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, an increase from 0.44% the previous year [4]. - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, Klarna's stock price had fallen to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the IPO price [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows investors to seek lead plaintiff status if they have the greatest financial interest in the case [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - Halper Sadeh LLC is investigating Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. and Janus Henderson Group plc for potential violations of federal securities laws and breaches of fiduciary duties to shareholders related to their respective sales to private equity firms at specified cash prices per share [1][2]. Group 1: Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. - Clearwater Analytics is being sold to Permira and Warburg Pincus for $24.55 per share in cash [1]. - The investigation may seek increased consideration for shareholders and additional disclosures regarding the transaction [3]. Group 2: Janus Henderson Group plc - Janus Henderson is being sold to Trian Fund Management and General Catalyst for $49.00 per share in cash [2]. - Similar to Clearwater, the investigation may pursue increased consideration and additional disclosures for Janus shareholders [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation and Support - Shareholders are encouraged to contact Halper Sadeh LLC to discuss their legal rights and options at no charge [4]. - The firm represents investors globally who have experienced securities fraud and corporate misconduct, recovering millions for defrauded investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Integer Holdings Corporation is facing a securities fraud class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements regarding its competitive position and sales performance in the EP manufacturing market [2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025, Integer failed to disclose that it materially overstated its competitive position in the EP manufacturing market [2]. - The complaint alleges that despite Integer's assertions of strong visibility into customer demand, the company was experiencing a sustained decline in sales related to two of its EP devices [2]. - Integer mischaracterized its EP devices as a long-term growth driver for its C&V segment, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Investor Participation - Investors who suffered losses related to Integer Holdings Corporation have the opportunity to lead the class action lawsuit, with a deadline for participation set for February 9, 2026 [1][2]. - Interested investors can contact the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz for more information or to participate in the lawsuit [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Law Offices of Howard G. Smith is announcing a securities fraud class action lawsuit against Bitdeer Technologies Group, inviting investors who suffered substantial losses to participate in the lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that between June 6, 2024, and November 10, 2025, Bitdeer failed to disclose critical information regarding the SEAL04 chip, which was expected to have a chip-level energy efficiency of 5 J/TH and was projected to be ready for use in A4 rigs with mass production beginning in Q2 2025 [3]. - The complaint claims that the positive statements made by Bitdeer regarding its business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis during the relevant time period [3]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who suffered losses in Bitdeer Technologies Group are encouraged to contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith before February 2, 2026, to participate in the ongoing securities fraud lawsuit [2]. - Interested parties can reach out via email, telephone, or visit the law firm's website for more information regarding their legal rights and the class action [4].

Core Viewpoint - The StubHub class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives misled investors regarding the financial health of the company during its IPO, leading to significant stock price declines after the release of disappointing financial results [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Salabaj v. StubHub Holdings, Inc., and it charges StubHub and certain executives with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 [1]. - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock during its IPO on September 17, 2025, have until January 23, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][2]. - The lawsuit claims that StubHub's IPO offering documents were materially false and misleading, particularly regarding changes in payment timing to vendors that adversely affected free cash flow [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Impact - StubHub's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $23.50 per share [2]. - The company reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million for Q3 2025, representing a 143% decrease year-over-year, and net cash from operating activities of $3.8 million, a 69.3% decrease [3]. - Following the release of these financial results, StubHub's stock price fell nearly 21%, and by the time the lawsuit commenced, the stock was trading at $10.31 per share, a decline of nearly 56% from the IPO price [3][4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Representation - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased StubHub common stock during the IPO to seek lead plaintiff status in the class action lawsuit [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [5]. Group 4: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been recognized for its significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

Company Overview - Roblox is a gaming and creation platform [2] Investigation Details - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is investigating potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws involving Roblox Corporation [1] - The investigation focuses on whether Roblox and certain top executives made materially false and/or misleading statements or omitted material information regarding Roblox's business and operations [2] Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller is a leading law firm representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, ranked 1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years [3] - In 2024, Robbins Geller recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases, more than the next five law firms combined [3] - The firm has obtained some of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever at $7.2 billion in the Enron case [3]