Core Viewpoint - Civitas Resources, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding its oil production and financial health during the specified class period [1][3]. Company Overview - Civitas Resources is an exploration and production company focused on acquiring, developing, and producing crude oil and natural gas from its assets in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado and the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Civitas Resources misled investors by failing to disclose significant expected reductions in oil production for 2025, which were attributed to declines following peak production in late 2024 and a low count of newly operational wells [3]. - It is claimed that increasing oil production would necessitate acquiring additional land and development locations, leading to significant debt and asset sales to cover acquisition costs [3]. - The lawsuit also states that Civitas Resources' financial condition would require disruptive cost-cutting measures, including a substantial workforce reduction, which would negatively impact its business and operational capabilities [3]. Financial Performance - On February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 financial results, with revenue of $1.29 billion, missing consensus estimates by $3.44 million, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.78, falling short of estimates by $0.21 [4]. - The company projected a year-over-year decline in oil production of approximately 4%, with an average production target of 150 to 155 thousand barrels per day for 2025 [4]. - Civitas Resources announced a 10% workforce reduction and the termination of key executives, which contributed to an over 18% drop in its stock price following the news [4].

Core Viewpoint - Julie & Holleman LLP is investigating potential claims against Ibotta, Inc. and its executives due to significant losses suffered by shareholders following misleading information regarding risks associated with The Kroger Co. and a sharp decline in stock price after the IPO [1][2][3] Group 1: Legal Investigation - Julie & Holleman LLP is a shareholder rights firm that is looking into legal claims against Ibotta, its executives, and possibly the board of directors [3] - The firm has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for clients in previous cases [3] Group 2: Stock Performance - Ibotta went public with an IPO price of $88 per share, but the stock has since dropped significantly, resulting in substantial financial losses for investors [2]

NEW YORK, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Doximity, Inc. (NYSE: DOCS) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders. According to a federal securities lawsuit, Insiders at Doximity caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose material information concerning the Company’s business and operations. Specifically, the Complaint alleges Defendants repeatedly touted the Company’s business pro ...

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of SoundHound AI, Inc. related to misrepresentation of financial reporting and internal controls [1] Group 1: Allegations of Misrepresentation - Insiders at SoundHound allegedly caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting [2] - The company overstated its remediation efforts regarding these material weaknesses, impacting its ability to account for corporate acquisitions [2] - SoundHound's reported goodwill following the Amelia Acquisition was inflated and would require correction due to these weaknesses [2] Group 2: Impact on Financial Reporting - SoundHound is likely to require additional time and resources to effectively account for the SYNQ3 and Amelia Acquisitions [2] - The identified weaknesses increased the risk of the company being unable to timely file certain financial reports with the SEC [2] - As a result, the company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times [2]

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. related to misrepresentation in clinical trial data [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - Kuehn Law is looking into whether Neumora Therapeutics' insiders misrepresented or failed to disclose critical information regarding the company's Phase Three Program [2]. - The investigation centers on amendments made to BlackThorn's original Phase Two Trial inclusion criteria, which were altered to include patients with moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) [2]. - The Phase Two Trials reportedly lacked sufficient data, particularly concerning patient population size and gender ratio, which raises concerns about the predictive accuracy for the KOASTAL-1 study results [2]. Group 2: Shareholder Actions - Shareholders who purchased NMRA shares before September 15, 2023, are encouraged to contact Kuehn Law to discuss their rights and potential involvement in the investigation [3]. - Kuehn Law offers to cover all case costs for investor clients, emphasizing the importance of timely action for shareholders [3].

Core Viewpoint - Civitas Resources, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding its financial health and operational capabilities during the class period from February 27, 2024, to February 24, 2025 [1][3]. Company Overview - Civitas Resources is an exploration and production company focused on crude oil and natural gas production, primarily operating in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado and the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Civitas Resources misled investors by failing to disclose significant expected reductions in oil production for 2025, which were attributed to natural declines in the DJ Basin and a low count of newly operational wells [3]. - It is claimed that increasing production would necessitate acquiring additional land and development locations, leading to significant debt and asset sales [3]. - The lawsuit also states that Civitas Resources would need to implement disruptive cost-cutting measures, including workforce reductions, which would negatively impact its business and financial prospects [3]. Financial Performance - On February 24, 2025, Civitas Resources reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 financial results, with revenue of $1.29 billion, missing consensus estimates by $3.44 million, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.78, missing estimates by $0.21 [4]. - The company projected a year-over-year decline in oil production of approximately 4%, with an average production target of 150 to 155 thousand barrels per day for 2025 [4]. - Civitas Resources announced a $300 million transaction to expand its Permian Basin position and a divestment target of $300 million to offset acquisition costs [4]. - The company also revealed a 10% workforce reduction and the termination of key executives, which led to an over 18% drop in stock price following the announcement [4].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. (NASDAQ: WBTN) towards shareholders [1] Financial Performance Issues - WEBTOON insiders allegedly caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose a deceleration in advertising revenue growth [2] - The company also reportedly experienced a deceleration in revenue from IP adaptations [2] - There was exposure to weaker foreign currencies that offset revenue growth [2] - As a result of these issues, positive statements regarding the company's business, operations, and prospects were deemed materially misleading or lacking a reasonable basis [2]