Core Viewpoint - CarMax, Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws, following disappointing financial results and claims regarding its assessment of car loan risks [1][2]. Financial Performance - CarMax reported a 5.4% decline in retail used unit sales, a 6.3% decline in comparable store used unit sales, and a 2.2% decline in wholesale units for Q2 of fiscal year 2026 [4]. - The company's net earnings for Q2 were approximately $95.4 million, down from $132.8 million in the previous year [4]. - A significant factor for the declines was identified as a "pull forward" in demand due to U.S. tariffs, which led to a loan loss provision of $142.2 million in the financing segment, resulting in an 11.2% year-over-year decrease in income from this segment [4]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the announcement of its disappointing financial results, CarMax's stock price fell by $11.45 per share, approximately 20%, from $57.05 on September 24, 2025, to $45.60 on September 25, 2025 [5]. Investigation Context - The investigation stems from claims that CarMax misrepresented the sustainability of demand for its vehicles and failed to properly assess the risks associated with its car loans [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - Class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of several publicly-traded companies, with specific deadlines for filing lead plaintiff motions [1] Group 1: Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTNT) - Class period is from November 8, 2024, to August 6, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of November 21, 2025 [2] - Allegations include false and misleading statements regarding the refresh cycle's profitability, lack of clarity on upgradeable FortiGate firewalls, and misrepresentation of the refresh momentum [2] Group 2: Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE: MOH) - Class period is from February 5, 2025, to July 23, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of December 2, 2025 [3] - Allegations include failure to disclose adverse facts about medical cost trend assumptions, dependency on low utilization of services for growth, and likely cuts to financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 [3] Group 3: Marex Group plc (NASDAQ: MRX) - Class period is from May 16, 2024, to August 5, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of December 8, 2025 [4] - Allegations include selling over-the-counter financial instruments to itself, inconsistencies in financial statements, and unreliability of Marex's financial disclosures [4]

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action securities lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation concealed rising costs associated with infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, significantly affected the Company's business and financial results [2]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is claimed to be unreliable and overstated regarding the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy and the impact of economic uncertainty [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate in the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4].

NEW YORK, Oct. 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Baxter International Inc. (NYSE: BAX) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Baxter, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/baxter-international-inc ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against PubMatic, Inc. regarding allegations of securities fraud and unlawful business practices [2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors are encouraged to contact Pomerantz LLP if they purchased PubMatic securities during the Class Period, with a deadline to apply as Lead Plaintiff by October 20, 2025 [2]. - A copy of the Complaint related to the class action can be obtained from Pomerantz's website [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Impact - On August 11, 2025, PubMatic reported a reduction in ad spend from a top demand side platform (DSP) partner, which negatively impacted its financial outlook [4]. - The CEO of PubMatic indicated that a significant number of clients had shifted to a new platform, creating challenges for the company [4]. - Following the announcement, PubMatic's stock price dropped by $2.23, or 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025 [4].

Core Insights - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is investigating potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws involving Jefferies Financial Group Inc., focusing on whether Jefferies and its executives made false or misleading statements or failed to disclose material information to investors [1] Company Overview - Jefferies Financial Group Inc. is a global full-service investment banking and capital markets firm, managing and providing services to various alternative asset management platforms under the Leucadia Asset Management umbrella [2] Recent Developments - On September 29, 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that First Brands filed for bankruptcy amid accounting questions, with lenders and independent board directors probing potential misrepresentations in financial reporting [3] - Jefferies disclosed that funds managed by its asset-management unit, Point Bonita Capital, are owed approximately $715 million from companies that purchased parts from First Brands [3] - The U.S. Department of Justice has initiated an inquiry into the collapse of First Brands Group, investigating the company's dealings with creditors [3] - Reports indicated that First Brands' former CEO was attempting to refinance nearly $6 billion of corporate loans with Jefferies, without disclosing billions of dollars of off-balance-sheet debt to prospective lenders [3]

Core Viewpoint - James Hardie Industries plc is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws, following revelations about its North American sales performance being driven by temporary inventory loading rather than sustainable customer demand [1][3]. Company Overview - James Hardie is a producer and marketer of high-performance fiber cement and fiber gypsum building solutions, primarily used in external siding for the residential building industry in the U.S. and Canada [2]. Sales Performance - The company claimed that its "fast[]-growing customers" were a key aspect of its competitive positioning and that its North American business results demonstrated inherent strength [3]. - However, it was revealed that North American net sales declined by 12% in fiscal Q1 2026, attributed to customers returning to normal inventory levels, indicating a lack of sustainable demand [4]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the disclosure of declining sales, James Hardie's stock price fell by $9.79 per share, a decrease of over 34%, from $28.43 on August 19, 2025, to $18.64 on August 20, 2025 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Jefferies Financial Group Inc. and its trade finance arm Point Bonita Capital are under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws following their significant exposure to the bankrupt First Brands Group, LLC [1][2][4]. Group 1: Investigation Details - Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP is investigating whether Jefferies and Point Bonita made materially false and misleading statements to investors regarding their exposure to First Brands [4]. - Jefferies and Point Bonita had approximately $715 million in exposure to First Brands' receivables, which constitutes about 25% of Point Bonita's trade finance portfolio [3]. Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the announcement of their exposure, Jefferies' stock price dropped by $4.66 per share, or approximately 8%, from $59.10 on October 7, 2025, to $54.44 on October 8, 2025 [3]. - Investors are reportedly seeking redemptions from Point Bonita in light of the situation [3]. Group 3: Company Background - Jefferies is an investment banking and capital markets firm, while Point Bonita Capital serves as its trade finance arm [2]. - Both firms were closely associated with First Brands Group, an auto parts supplier that filed for bankruptcy in September 2025 [2].

BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of Zions Bancorporation, National Association ("Zions†or the "Company†) (NASDAQ: ZION) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN ZIONS (ZION), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal righ. ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against PubMatic, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025 [1][2] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The complaint alleges that PubMatic's management made false statements and concealed significant information regarding a top demand side platform buyer shifting clients to a new platform, leading to reduced ad spend and revenue for PubMatic [2] - The lawsuit claims that the positive statements made by the defendants about PubMatic's business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until October 20, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [3] - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]