Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent resolution passed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regarding the Iran nuclear issue, emphasizing that military force and confrontation will not resolve the situation [1][3]. Group 1: IAEA Resolution and Reactions - The IAEA Board of Governors approved a resolution pushed by the US, UK, France, and Germany concerning Iran's nuclear program [1]. - China, Russia, and Niger voted against the resolution, while 12 developing countries, including Brazil, South Africa, India, Egypt, and Thailand, abstained from voting [4]. Group 2: China's Position - China's representative at the IAEA, Li Song, stated that military actions, such as the Israeli and US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities under IAEA supervision, have worsened the situation [3]. - Li emphasized that the resolution of the Iran nuclear issue requires respect for Iran's rights under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and should be approached through diplomatic efforts and cooperation within the IAEA framework [3].

Core Points - The article emphasizes that military force and confrontation cannot resolve the Iranian nuclear issue, advocating for political and diplomatic efforts within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [1][2] - China, Russia, and Niger voted against the resolution pushed by the US, UK, France, and Germany regarding the Iranian nuclear issue, while several developing countries abstained from voting [2] Group 1 - The Chinese representative, Li Song, stated that the use of military force has led to a significant reversal in the situation regarding Iran's nuclear program, particularly referencing the attacks on Iranian facilities by Israel and the US [1] - The IAEA and Iran reached an agreement in September to restore cooperation on the nuclear issue, which was undermined by the actions of the UK, France, and Germany [1][2] - The article highlights the need for the IAEA to create favorable conditions for dialogue and cooperation between Iran and the agency, rather than escalating tensions [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that military force and confrontation cannot resolve the Iranian nuclear issue, advocating for political and diplomatic efforts within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program [1][2]. Group 1: IAEA Resolution and International Response - The IAEA Board of Governors passed a resolution on the Iranian nuclear issue, driven by the US, UK, France, and Germany [1]. - China, represented by Li Song, condemned the military actions taken by Israel and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, which have significantly worsened the situation [1]. - The resolution's push by Western countries is seen as undermining the cooperation between Iran and the IAEA, which had recently made progress in restoring dialogue [1][2]. Group 2: Call for Diplomatic Solutions - Li Song stressed that the Iranian nuclear issue should be resolved through respect for Iran's rights under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and through diplomatic dialogue [2]. - The article highlights that confrontational resolutions only exacerbate the situation, urging the IAEA to create favorable conditions for dialogue and cooperation [2]. - Among the 34 member countries voting in the IAEA, China, Russia, and Niger opposed the resolution, while several developing countries abstained [2].

李松强调， 武力和对抗解决不了问题。 伊核问题只能在充分尊重伊朗作为《不扩散核武器条约》缔约 国和平利用核能正当权利、确保伊核计划和平性质的前提下，通过政治外交努力和在国际原子能机构框 架内的保障监督合作，才能得到妥善解决。历史已经反复证明，在理事会强行推动对抗性的涉伊决议， 只能火上浇油、雪上加霜。当前形势下，理事会应努力推动伊核问题相关讨论平稳进行，为伊朗与国际 原子能机构开展合作对话创造有利条件、为伊核问题新一轮政治外交努力营造良好氛围，避免将伊核问 题进一步推向对抗轨道。 国际原子能机构理事会参与投票的34个成员国中， 中国、俄罗斯、尼日尔对决议投反对票， 巴西、南 非、印度、埃及、泰国等12个发展中国家投弃权票。 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 来源：新华社 中国代表：武力和对抗解决不了伊朗核问题 国际原子能机构理事会20日表决通过美国与英国、法国、德国共同推动的伊朗核问题决议。中国常驻国 际原子能机构代表李松发言阐述中方立场，强调武力和对抗解决不了伊核问题。 李松指出，今年6月， 以色列、美国悍然袭击伊朗受国际原子能机构保障监督的核设施，导致伊核问题 形势出 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent resolution passed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regarding the Iran nuclear issue, emphasizing that military force and confrontation will not resolve the problem, and that diplomatic efforts are essential for a peaceful solution [3][4]. Group 1: IAEA Resolution and Reactions - The IAEA Board of Governors approved a resolution pushed by the US, UK, France, and Germany concerning Iran's nuclear program [3]. - China's representative at the IAEA, Li Song, condemned the military actions taken by Israel and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, which have escalated the situation [3][4]. - The resolution has been criticized for undermining the cooperation between Iran and the IAEA, especially after a recent agreement was reached in September to restore collaboration [3][4]. Group 2: Diplomatic Efforts and Future Directions - Li Song emphasized that the Iran nuclear issue can only be resolved through political and diplomatic efforts, respecting Iran's rights under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [4]. - The article suggests that the IAEA should facilitate discussions regarding the Iran nuclear issue to create a conducive environment for cooperation and dialogue [4]. - Among the 34 member countries voting on the resolution, China, Russia, and Niger opposed it, while several developing countries, including Brazil and South Africa, abstained from voting [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that military force and confrontation cannot resolve the Iranian nuclear issue, advocating for political and diplomatic efforts within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program [1][2]. Group 1 - The IAEA Board of Governors passed a resolution on the Iranian nuclear issue, driven by the US, UK, France, and Germany, which China opposed, highlighting that military actions have worsened the situation [1]. - China's representative, Li Song, condemned the recent military actions by Israel and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, stating that such actions undermine international cooperation and exacerbate tensions [1][2]. - The article notes that in September, an agreement was reached between the IAEA and Iran to restore cooperation, which was disrupted by the unilateral actions of the UK, France, and Germany [1][2]. Group 2 - Li Song reiterated that the Iranian nuclear issue should be addressed by respecting Iran's rights under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and through diplomatic dialogue, rather than through confrontational resolutions [2]. - The article mentions that among the 34 member countries voting in the IAEA Board, China, Russia, and Niger voted against the resolution, while 12 developing countries, including Brazil, South Africa, India, Egypt, and Thailand, abstained [2].

Core Viewpoint - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is set to review a resolution draft concerning Iran's nuclear issues, with IAEA Director General Grossi emphasizing the need for Iran to fully cooperate with IAEA verification efforts [1] Group 1: IAEA's Actions and Statements - IAEA verification personnel have returned to Iran but have not yet been able to inspect key nuclear facilities affected by attacks in June, such as Fordow and Natanz [1] - Iran has not provided reports on the affected facilities and related nuclear materials, which it is obligated to do under safeguard agreements [1] - Grossi stated that the resolution draft will be reviewed by the IAEA Board, and if passed, it will be executed by the IAEA [1] Group 2: Iran's Response and Concerns - Iran has warned that the resolution draft proposed by the US, UK, France, and Germany would be a "major mistake" and an attempt to politicize the IAEA [1] - Iran's warning indicates that the passing of the resolution could impact its cooperation with the IAEA [6] Group 3: Challenges for IAEA - The situation reflects the IAEA's struggle to balance political resolutions and technical verifications, especially in a context of significant trust deficits [6] - Regardless of whether the resolution passes, the primary challenge for the IAEA remains ensuring necessary verifications continue amid a lack of trust [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the upcoming meeting between Russian and American leaders in Budapest aims to address the Ukraine issue and improve bilateral relations, although specific details and preparations are still pending [1] - The Russian side emphasizes the importance of the good relationship between the leaders of Russia, the US, and Hungary in choosing Budapest as the meeting location [1] - Ongoing serious communication between Russia and the US regarding the Ukraine issue is highlighted, indicating a willingness to continue diplomatic efforts [1] Group 2 - Russia's position on the US refusal to provide "Tomahawk" cruise missiles to Ukraine is that there will be no formal notification from the US, and Russia will adjust its stance based on public statements [2] - The Russian side remains firm on its negotiation position regarding military actions and has not commented on potential discussions about territorial exchanges between Russia and Ukraine [2] Group 3 - Russia expresses a willingness to expand cooperation with Iran across all fields, criticizing Western pressure on Iran as unjustified [3] - The situation surrounding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is described as complex, with the EU's non-constructive stance exacerbating the crisis [3] Group 4 - The Russian Foreign Ministry emphasizes that the resolution of the Ukraine issue must occur within the framework established during the meeting of the Russian and American leaders in Alaska [4] - Upcoming phone talks between Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and US Secretary of State Rubio will address the Ukraine issue, bilateral agenda, and economic matters [4][6]

Core Points - The Egyptian Foreign Minister, Sameh Shoukry, held a phone call with Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, and US Special Envoy for Middle East Affairs, Brett McGurk, to discuss the progress of the Iranian nuclear issue [1] - Shoukry emphasized the need for all parties to continue efforts to ease tensions and build mutual trust to create conditions for the resumption of negotiations, aiming for a comprehensive agreement that balances interests and contributes to regional security and stability [1] - All parties agreed to maintain contact and follow-up in hopes of achieving breakthroughs on this issue [1]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif stated that Iran will never join the Abraham Accords, emphasizing that the agreement normalizes relations with a regime accused of crimes and genocide, which contradicts Iran's ideals [1] Group 1: Iran's Position on the Abraham Accords - Zarif clearly articulated that the Abraham Accords do not align with Iran's principles, asserting that Iran will not participate in such agreements [1] - The Iranian stance reflects a broader rejection of normalization with Israel, particularly in light of the ongoing regional tensions [1] Group 2: Regional Diplomatic Dynamics - The Abraham Accords, facilitated by former President Trump, led to normalization between several Arab nations and Israel, including the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco, but faced challenges in advancing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel [1] - Following the outbreak of the recent Israel-Palestine conflict in October 2023, Saudi Arabia has suspended negotiations for normalizing relations with Israel [1]