"七分考，三分报"，这句话道出了填报志愿环节对于高考而言的重要性。又一年高考放榜时，千万考生再次站在了人生岔路口，同时也催生出了规模庞大 的高考志愿填报市场。 不过，作为高考志愿填报界的顶流，中国知名教育博主张雪峰却在高考放榜前突然宣布暂别直播间，引发了外界的激烈讨论。 与此同时，阿里、百度、腾讯以及一众大型教育公司相继推出了AI志愿填报产品，主打免费、智能、便捷。难怪网友戏称："张雪峰走了，免费'张雪 峰'又来了。" 不过，高考志愿填报在7月上旬便会陆续结束，在这短短的十数天中，大厂又能打出怎样的"新牌"。一轮密集推新背后，高考志愿填报这块"蛋糕"，到底 有多诱人？ 高考志愿，不止10亿市场 根据艾媒数据，2024年中国高考志愿填报市场付费规模达10.2亿元，预计到2027年，付费规模将突破12亿元。 乍一看，高考志愿填报市场规模并不算大，但在过去十年，其就像一块吸水的海绵，市场规模从2016年的1.3亿元飙升至如今的超十亿元，年复合增长率 达到26.8%。 不过，一向敢言的张雪峰，却在高考放榜前突然宣布暂别直播间，他表示"干我这个行当不容易的，我动了太多的人的蛋糕了，有些东西我不能说得过于 直白。" 此事 ...

7月2日清晨，鲁西南一座小村庄，张驰手里拿着提前从夸克生成的志愿报告，和他的朋友们，早早就与 家长一同驱车前往县城。高考结束短暂的轻松之后，人生更重要的课题需要被加倍认真对待——报志 愿。 不同于更早些年报志愿靠"蒙"，花钱请专业人士帮忙报志愿的风，终究是吹到了土地的褶皱里。"事关 孩子终生大事，我们也不懂，就花钱让人家专业的人报吧。"张弛家长说。 他们选择的这个小机构，主力只有3个工作人员，每个学生收费2000到4000元不等，报志愿耗时约几个 小时。小机构已经做了好几年，乡镇生源们打听报考机构的信息途径有限，这种模式依然是"时髦生 意"。 咨询流程与AI提供的大体相似，确认过考生的专业偏好、职业倾向、地域偏好、目标院校、优先策 略、毕业规划、学费倾向及家庭附加因素等信息后，结合考生成绩，给出志愿建议。 志愿"落槌"之前，上千万高考生对于人生走向，已经有了大致认知。这部分信息差的弥补，并不花钱， 而是由AI大模型完成。 今年，夸克、百度、腾讯借助AI大模型，进一步完善了AI志愿工具，耗费在志愿填报上的算力着实庞 大，但互联网大厂们在这件事上的决策出奇地一致——很重视，但不追求商业价值，免费提供咨询服 务。 ...

海南中招志愿7月6日起填报 第三批包括有五年一贯制招生计划的高等学校、中高职"3+2"连读及中高职"3+2"分段培养试点班， 以及一般公办普通高中学校、民办普通高中学校(含第二批次未录取完的剩余计划)。考生在本批次可分 别填报1个自主招生志愿、12个统招生平行志愿，依次投档录取，其中统招生平行志愿包括普通高中统 招生、高等学校五年一贯制和中高职"3+2"试点班志愿，最多可填报6个普通高中统招生志愿。 需要注意的是，学籍与户籍不一致的本省户籍和学籍考生，需于第一次填报志愿期间二选一身份填 报。此类型考生如果选择以户籍地报考户籍所在地的普通高中(含户籍所在地的省属中学，但海南省国 兴中学除外)，列入报考学校单列计划招收对象范围;如果以户籍地报考海南省国兴中学，则和以学籍地 报考该校无差别。 省考试局提醒，考生应尽早登录中招管理系统保存并提交志愿信息，以防截止时间临近遇到网络拥 堵等问题。填报期间，考生可多次进行志愿修改和提交，最终以最后一次保存并提交成功的志愿数据为 准。 在省属中学有学籍的考生，按属地原则可视为具有学校所在地市县的学籍。海南中学美伦校区校址 在澄迈县老城镇;海南省农垦实验中学、海南热带海洋学院附 ...

面对混乱的高考志愿填报市场，考生和家长需要擦亮双眼。教育部阳光高考信息平台、各省教育考 试院官网等官方平台提供了全面且权威的高校招生信息，包括招生计划、历年录取分数线、专业介绍 等，这些都是考生和家长进行志愿填报的可靠依据。部分地区还成立了专业志愿填报辅导团队，如北京 市组织志愿填报专家进校支招填报技巧、高招网220人专家团队的线上咨询与线下校园活动形成互补， 让高考学子在人生关键时刻作出理性判断。 高考志愿填报虽然涉及方方面面，但最终还是考生对自身特长、兴趣爱好以及生涯规划的综合考 量。所谓"三百六十行，行行出状元"，考生应立足自身兴趣爱好挖掘特长潜质，将个人理想追求与国家 人才需求结合起来，从而作出正确选择。(本文来源：经济日报 作者：李丹) 志愿填报的复杂性在于不仅要考虑分数与院校的录取线匹配，更是个人兴趣、职业与人生规划的综 合考量。很多填报机构多采取流水线式服务，面向不同考生，很难给出有针对性、有价值的指导，不仅 可能浪费考生和家长的时间与金钱，还有可能影响考生的未来发展。 高考志愿填报是学子迈向理想大学的关键一环。选择什么样的专业和学校，影响着学子们未来的人 生发展。然而，一些所谓"填报机构"的套 ...

Core Insights - The rise of online services for college entrance exam application guidance has led to a proliferation of both legitimate and dubious service providers, resulting in a chaotic market where many students and parents are dissatisfied with the services received [1][2] - The lack of long-term vision in some services promotes short-term, utilitarian choices, which can detract from students' deeper reflections on life values and career significance [1] - There is a pressing need for a more open data service platform to bridge the information gap between students, majors, industries, and employment opportunities, as current paid consulting services are often unreliable [2] Market Dynamics - The market for college application consulting services is characterized by a lack of regulation and industry standards, leading to a situation where low-quality services are prevalent and high-quality services are scarce and expensive [2] - The focus on employment outcomes has made information about schools, majors, and industry trends increasingly important, creating a natural market demand for consulting services [1] Proposed Solutions - The establishment of a comprehensive database that consolidates publicly available data on college admissions, employment rates, and research findings could significantly enhance the reliability of information available to families [2] - Utilizing AI tools to facilitate the gathering and integration of data on a new platform could provide a more reliable, professional, and user-friendly service at a lower cost compared to existing chaotic offerings [3]

7月1日就要开始填高考志愿了，对于成绩在本科线边缘徘徊的家庭来说，或许此刻就十分纠结。 有人可能不乐意了，虽然小城市读的是公办"二本"，但毕竟有个"公办"名头，听起来也好听，社会认可度也似乎会高一些。 因为，摆在面前的就两条路：一个是去三四线甚至更小城市，读个公办的二本大学；另一个则是咬牙去大城市（比如省会、一线/新一线），读个民办本 科（或者叫独立学院）。 但问题是，去大城市读民办，学费不菲，一年动辄数万元起，四年下来不是一笔小数目；可去小城市读个本科，又担心孩子未来实习和就业，甚至校友资 源都不一定能用上。 而大城市的民办大学，本来就是"民办"，学费还特别高，每年动辄两三万甚至更高，四年下来少说也要十多万。 确实，相比公办本科统一5000元左右的学费，大城市的民办大学的学费不是一笔小数目。 可需要搞清楚的关键是，选择大学，不仅仅是学校性质，更是一个家庭未来四年的"隐形资源包"，以及孩子未来人生的"规划清晰度"。 今天咱就掰开了揉碎了聊聊，这个"鸡头凤尾"该怎么选？ 经济成本：大城市VS小城市 先说观点：孩子刚过本科线，家庭经济条件允许的情况下，还是让孩子去大城市读民办大学。 这账要真算明白，得把眼光放长远 ...

Core Viewpoint - The integration of AI technology in college entrance examination (Gaokao) application processes has become a significant highlight this year, with various education technology companies and internet giants launching AI-based application products and services [1][3]. Industry Overview - The paid scale of China's Gaokao application market was 950 million yuan in 2023, with nearly 90% of examinees willing to choose application services. The market is expected to grow to 1.09 billion yuan by 2025 [3]. - The rapid maturity of large model technology and increased user adoption have made the Gaokao application sector a competitive battleground, with nearly ten companies launching smart application products this year [3][4]. Product Analysis - AI application products can be categorized into three main types: 1. Data-driven products that integrate admission scores, rankings, and professional details to match users with "reach, stable, and fallback" options [4][6]. 2. Products based on large model technology that support user interaction and multi-turn dialogue to provide application suggestions [4][8]. 3. Platforms with personalized diagnostic systems that focus on individual needs, incorporating career assessments and generating professional inclinations [4][6]. Product Performance - The official platform, Sunshine Application Information Service System, is noted for its authoritative data and public service, providing intelligent filtering for applicants [6]. - Quark's "Smart Application" feature recommends schools and majors based on basic information and allows for personalized preferences [6][7]. - Other products like Baidu's AI Assistant and Homework Help offer similar functionalities, providing recommendations and admission probability predictions [7][8]. Challenges and Limitations - AI application products exhibit several shortcomings, including inaccurate ranking positioning, outdated data, and misleading information [1][3][9]. - Real-world testing revealed significant discrepancies between AI-generated rankings and actual data, leading to inappropriate school recommendations [12][13]. - The AI tools may struggle with new programs lacking historical data, potentially misleading users [22][23]. Expert Insights - Experts suggest that AI application tools should be viewed as "information filters" rather than decision-makers, emphasizing the importance of human verification of key data [21][23]. - The value of AI lies in its ability to process structured data, alleviating the workload of students and parents while allowing for a focus on individual needs [22][24].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-assisted college application tools has sparked interest among students and parents, with various products emerging in the market, but concerns about their reliability and accuracy remain prevalent [1][2][5]. Group 1: Market Trends - Numerous AI college application products have recently launched, becoming popular in the market, with significant engagement on social media platforms [2]. - The demand for AI tools is evident, as many students and parents are actively trying these products, with some institutions promoting AI as a key feature of their services [3]. - Prices for AI-assisted application services vary widely, from free offerings by educational departments to paid services costing hundreds to thousands of yuan [3]. Group 2: Product Reliability - The effectiveness of AI-generated application suggestions is questioned, with some users reporting discrepancies in the results provided by different AI tools [6]. - Concerns about the accuracy of AI recommendations stem from the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used, with some tools lacking critical information such as admission rankings and regional adjustments [6]. - Experts highlight that while AI can streamline the process, it may not fully account for individual circumstances and preferences that are crucial for making informed decisions [6][8]. Group 3: Expert Recommendations - Experts suggest a "human-AI collaboration" approach, where users leverage AI tools while also applying their judgment and verifying the information provided [7][8]. - It is recommended that users familiarize themselves with the underlying data and logic of AI tools before relying on them for important decisions [8]. - Educational departments are actively providing support and guidance to help students navigate the application process, emphasizing the importance of understanding official guidelines and policies [8].

输入省份、分数、科目、排名，填完性格测试，选好专业，智能体啪地甩出一份十几页的志愿报告。"冲稳保"档档清晰，排版整齐、术语遍 布，满满透着专业感，甚至细致到调剂建议、职业生涯规划...... 高考出分前一周，夸克"暖芒计划"高考公益活动落地湖南省永顺县第一中学。在这所偏远县城的中学，绝大多数学生家庭无力负担动辄大几千 甚至上万元的志愿填报服务，更遑论去外地参加高校宣讲会。许多乡村学生的父母教育水平有限，对高等教育体系知之甚少，根本无力指导报 考，只能完全依赖学校老师。"我们这里没有张雪峰，也请不起张雪峰。"这是现场600多位乡村考生和家长共同的心声。每每到报考季，面对一 个班的学生，一中班主任王菊香往往心有余而力不足。 而在18日的这场公益活动现场，手机屏幕上，一份过去要花几天甚至十几天查找和比对信息，需要耐心和记忆力才能完成的繁杂志愿分析，如 今只需一个提问。 2025年，全国高考报名人数为1335万人，虽比2024年的峰值略有回落，但仍是近十年里的第二高位；而今年本科招生计划预计仍维持在 490 万 左右。艾媒咨询最新报告显示，2025 年中国高报市场付费规模预计达10.9亿元，超九成考生愿借助专业服务规 ...

Core Points - The Ministry of Education has issued a warning to students and parents regarding the upcoming college admissions process, emphasizing the importance of using official channels for information and avoiding scams [1][2] - There has been an increase in fraudulent activities by individuals and organizations that misrepresent themselves as official sources of college admissions information, often using fake websites and social media accounts [1] - The Ministry has clarified that there are no official qualifications for "college application planners," and any claims of insider information or special treatment in admissions are false [2] Group 1 - The Ministry of Education has reminded students and parents to verify college admissions information through official channels to prevent falling victim to scams [1] - There are reports of individuals and organizations creating fake accounts and websites to disseminate inaccurate information about college admissions, leading to potential financial exploitation of students and parents [1] - The Ministry has coordinated with internet platforms to ensure that official college and admissions office websites are properly identified to help users avoid scams [1] Group 2 - The Ministry has stated that there is no such thing as a "college application planner" certification, and most individuals claiming to hold such titles are temporary hires with no official standing [2] - During the admissions period, some individuals falsely claim connections to admissions officials or offer to facilitate admissions through illegal means, which is a form of fraud [2] - The college admissions process is strictly regulated, and any claims of special admissions criteria or fees are to be disregarded as they are not part of the official process [2]