Core Viewpoint - Yunnan Jinggu Forestry Co., Ltd. is facing legal challenges involving its subsidiary, Tangxian Huiyin Wood Industry Co., Ltd., which has received a property preservation order from the Tangxian People's Court, with a preservation amount of 10,930,666.67 yuan [1][2] Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - The company has a total of 5 ongoing lawsuits involving Huiyin Wood Industry, with a total claim amount of 59.7 million yuan, which represents 62.77% of the latest audited net assets attributable to shareholders [2] - The previous disclosed lawsuits (excluding the current one) amounted to 49.7 million yuan, accounting for 52.26% of the latest audited net assets [2] Financial Impact - The assets subject to preservation measures include various equipment at Huiyin Wood Industry, which are valued at 10,930,666.67 yuan, with different preservation durations for bank deposits and movable properties [2][3] - The original controlling persons of Huiyin Wood Industry, Cui Huijun and Wang Lansun, have outstanding loans totaling approximately 30.89 million yuan [2][3] Company Response - The company has established a special team to verify the authenticity and completeness of the related loans and has hired litigation lawyers to actively respond to the lawsuits [2][5] - The company is committed to taking legal measures to mitigate the impact of these issues on its operations and to pursue recovery from responsible parties to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders [2][5]

Core Viewpoint - Guangdong Mingzhu Group Co., Ltd. announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary has received a civil ruling from the provincial high court regarding a loan dispute, which is currently in the execution phase [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - The subsidiary, Guangdong Mingzhu Group Land Co., Ltd., entered into a cooperation contract with Xingning Qisheng Industrial Co., Ltd. for a real estate development project that expired on November 15, 2021 [4]. - Due to Qisheng Industrial's failure to fulfill obligations under a debt settlement agreement, the subsidiary filed a lawsuit on December 2, 2022, after multiple communications failed [4][5]. - The case was accepted by the court, and a civil judgment was issued on January 17, 2024, confirming the execution of the judgment [5]. Group 2: Case Progress - On August 1, 2025, the company received a civil ruling from the provincial high court, which rejected Qisheng Industrial's application for retrial regarding the previous judgment [7]. - The case is currently in the execution phase, and the timeline for recovering the loan principal and interest remains uncertain [8]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The total amount involved in the case includes a principal of approximately 433.62 million yuan and interest of about 91.54 million yuan as of November 28, 2022 [3]. - The company is unable to determine the impact of this lawsuit on its current profits due to the uncertainty surrounding the execution results [3][8].

Core Points - The company announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Guangdong Mingzhu Group Land Co., Ltd., is in the execution phase of a lawsuit against Xingning Qisheng Industrial Co., Ltd. regarding a debt recovery case [1][2] - The total amount involved in the case includes a principal loan of 433,624,807.88 yuan and interest of 91,538,479.86 yuan as of November 28, 2022 [1][2] - The company is currently unable to determine the impact of this lawsuit on its profits due to the uncertainty surrounding the execution results [1][4] Case Background - The lawsuit stems from a cooperation agreement related to the "Liankang City (Phase 6 and 7)" real estate development project, which expired on November 15, 2021 [2] - A debt settlement agreement was signed on March 14, 2022, but Xingning Qisheng failed to meet the repayment obligations, leading to legal action [2][3] - The case has progressed through various legal stages, including a civil judgment and a subsequent application for retrial by Xingning Qisheng, which was ultimately rejected by the provincial high court [4] Current Status - The case is now in the execution phase, with the company actively pursuing the recovery of the owed amounts [1][4] - The company will continue to disclose updates regarding the lawsuit in accordance with legal regulations [4]

Core Viewpoint - ST Jinggu's subsidiary, Huiyin Wood Industry, is embroiled in a civil loan dispute, leading to asset seizures and a significant impact on its financial performance [1][3][5] Group 1: Legal Issues - The court has seized Huiyin Wood Industry's finished goods warehouse and all finished board goods, with an estimated asset value of approximately 50 million yuan [1][3] - The main bank account of Huiyin Wood Industry has been frozen, with approximately 800,000 yuan in funds [4] - The lawsuits involve three plaintiffs claiming a total of 40.7 million yuan in principal and interest from Huiyin Wood Industry and its shareholders [3][5] Group 2: Financial Performance - In 2023, ST Jinggu acquired a 51% stake in Huiyin Wood Industry for about 270 million yuan, resulting in an 83.7% appreciation and goodwill of 92 million yuan [2] - Huiyin Wood Industry's performance has deteriorated, with a net profit of 4.7 million yuan in 2023 but failing to meet performance commitments in 2024 [5][6] - The actual revenue for 2024 was 389 million yuan, with a net loss of 32 million yuan, significantly deviating from the forecasted revenue of 564 million yuan and net profit of 58 million yuan [5][6] Group 3: Market Conditions - The competitive landscape in the particle board and fiberboard industry has changed significantly, leading to price declines as companies reduce prices to capture market share [6] - The company attributes the substantial drop in profitability to industry-wide price transmission effects and increased competition [6]

Core Viewpoint - The company is currently involved in multiple lawsuits concerning financial disputes, with a total amount of approximately 40.7 million RMB in principal and interest at stake, which may impact its financial performance depending on the court's ruling [2][9]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Status - The court has accepted the case, but hearings have not yet commenced [2]. - The company’s subsidiary, Tangxian Huiyin Wood Industry Co., Ltd., along with its former controlling shareholders, are defendants in the lawsuits [2]. Financial Implications - The total amount involved in the lawsuits includes a principal of 40.7 million RMB and associated interest [2]. - The company’s assets, including a finished goods warehouse valued at approximately 50 million RMB and bank accounts with around 800,000 RMB, have been frozen as part of the legal proceedings [2][8]. Details of the Lawsuits - Three separate cases have been filed against the company: 1. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1696: Plaintiff Wang Sanquan claims a loan of 37.2 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 13.8% [3][4]. 2. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1697: Plaintiff Wang Dongxian claims a loan of 1.5 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 13.8% [5][6]. 3. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1698: Plaintiff Wang Xinwang claims a loan of 2 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 12% [7][8]. Company Response - The company has established a special task force to address the lawsuits, including members from intermediary institutions and legal counsel to protect its and shareholders' rights [10]. - The company will continue to monitor the situation and fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required [11].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Xiaoqing Jewelry (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. is involved in a legal dispute regarding a loan of over 449,000 yuan, linked to allegations of tax evasion and fraudulent invoicing [1][3] Group 1 - Liu Xiaoqing has been reported for tax evasion involving 3.3 million yuan, allegedly converting a loan into personal income through a small enterprise [1][2] - The Shanghai tax authority has initiated an investigation into the allegations made by Wang, who claims that Liu Xiaoqing issued invoices to evade over 27% personal income tax [1][3] - Liu Xiaoqing publicly denied knowing Wang and stated that the allegations are false and malicious, expressing willingness to cooperate with tax authorities [2][3] Group 2 - Wang has indicated that the tax evasion amount may exceed 3.3 million yuan and plans to pursue legal action regarding the execution of the case [3] - The Shenzhen Futian District People's Court has served legal documents related to the case to Liu Xiaoqing and associated parties, with a hearing scheduled for September 12 [3]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the ongoing litigation involving New Dazhou Holdings Co., Ltd. and the implications of a recent ruling by the Supreme People's Court of China regarding a loan dispute with Cai Laiyin, which has led to the freezing of certain assets and a potential sale of shares to settle debts [2][3]. Group 1: Litigation Overview - New Dazhou disclosed the lawsuit initiated by Cai Laiyin against multiple parties, including New Dazhou, in October 2019, related to a loan dispute [2]. - The Guangdong High People's Court ruled that New Dazhou is liable for half of the unpaid loan principal and interest owed to Cai Laiyin [2]. - As a result of the litigation, several bank accounts and equity interests of New Dazhou have been frozen, including profits from its stake in Inner Mongolia Yakeshi Wujiu Coal Group Co., Ltd. [2]. Group 2: Recent Developments - On June 6, 2025, New Dazhou received a civil ruling from the Supreme People's Court, which accepted its application for retrial regarding the previous judgment [3]. - The ruling includes a suspension of the execution of the original judgment, which had ordered the auction of New Dazhou's 44.918% stake in Wujiu Group to satisfy the debt [5]. - The company continues to accrue interest based on the original judgment while awaiting the outcome of the retrial [5]. Group 3: Impact on the Company - The suspension of the original judgment's execution may provide temporary relief for New Dazhou, but the final outcome of the retrial remains uncertain [5]. - The board of directors will monitor the situation closely and fulfill disclosure obligations as required by law [5].

Core Viewpoint - The recent tax evasion allegations against Liu Xiaoqing have sparked significant public interest, with Liu denying the accusations and asserting that the claims are malicious and unfounded [1][3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Liu Xiaoqing publicly denied the tax evasion allegations, stating that the court has confirmed she is not related to the loan mentioned by the accuser, Wang [1][7]. - Wang claims that he was informed by Liu's business partner about financial troubles within Liu's jewelry company, which led to a loan agreement [1][9]. - Liu emphasized her commitment to lawful tax payment and expressed willingness to cooperate with tax authorities for verification [5][7]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Wang has initiated legal action against Liu's jewelry company for loan repayment, with a court ruling in his favor regarding the loan of 3 million yuan [9][12]. - The court has also ordered Liu's jewelry company to cease using her name and likeness in its branding and marketing, along with compensating her for damages [14]. - Recent reports indicate ongoing investigations by the Shanghai tax authority into the allegations made by Wang against Liu and her associated enterprises [16][18].