More colleges and universities are opening their doors to an unusual revenue source: retirement communities, on or near campus. Is the setup working? @ekrembert takes @sarahsholder back to school to find out. https://t.co/p48niKyl1z ...

Government Strategy & Revenue Generation - The Trump administration is reportedly targeting deals in pharma, AI, energy, and mining sectors, potentially involving the government taking equity stakes in American companies [1] - The administration aims to generate revenue for the United States and taxpayers through these deals, framing it as deficit reduction [5][6] - The government intends to leverage its influence over companies, such as those requiring export licenses, government loans, or access to natural resources, to negotiate favorable deals [6] Deal Structure & Implications - The administration took a 5% stake in Lithium Americas and a stake in the mine they're working on [3] - The administration's approach can be viewed as a form of taxes and regulation, despite its lower corporate tax and deregulatory mission [9] - The White House indicates that more deals are in negotiation and announcements are expected in the coming days and weeks [2]

Overview of Axiom's Business Model - Axiom is monetizing flow at every step, capturing the entire loop of connect, track, trade, and farm, unlike DeFi apps that monetize a single action [1][2] - Axiom functions more like a trading OS than a DEX, combining spot, perps, and yield under one roof, routing liquidity instead of owning it [4][5] - Axiom's biggest vulnerability is its reliance on trading volume; if traders slow down, revenue collapses [6] Financial Performance - Axiom is on a $600 million annual run-rate, regularly pulling $1-3 million per day in fees, all of it company revenue [2] - Axiom's revenue is up 560% quarter over quarter [3] - Axiom is the most capital-light revenue engine in DeFi, with a $0 TVL model, meaning its economics don't depend on asset custody or mercenary liquidity [4] Competitive Positioning - Axiom sits in a unique spot on the DeFi map as part aggregator, part execution engine, part rewards platform [3] - Axiom's competitive edge lies in capturing flow rather than winning liquidity wars [5][6] - Axiom relies on Solana for spot liquidity, Hyperliquid for perps, and MarginFi for yield, making it vulnerable to disruptions in these upstream dependencies [7] Potential Opportunities - Axiom has a points + rakeback system that rewards trading, referrals, and quests, potentially leading to a revenue-backed airdrop [8] - Axiom's biggest moat may be being the default interface where traders start their day, owning the flow in DeFi [9] Risks and Challenges - Other trading apps and perps venues can fight aggressively for order flow, creating competitive pressure [10] - Rewards programs may attract short-term users who leave once incentives fade, posing a mercenary flow risk [10]

Return on assets (ROA) measures how well a company uses assets like buildings and equipment to generate revenue.Learn more here: https://t.co/5xHIptbyBt https://t.co/BR188ooKt4 ...

I'm livestreaming (for the first time ever) in 30 minsthe founders of two of the fastest revenue-generating startups in tech (pump and axiom)and some guy TWAPing 1.65B in SOL, I forget his nameahnvm just rememberedhis name was kyle samaniSolana (@solana):SOLANA LIVE returns 🎙️🟣Sept 16th at 12pm ESTHosted by @0xMert_ft. @a1lon9, @mist_trading, & @KyleSamani https://t.co/OzfclVKQVp ...

RT s4mmy (@S4mmyEth)PUMP has an insane revenue engine which (alongside its streaming virality) has driven its FDV above $8bn.Crazy that building a traditional business & integrating buybacks would work.You should also pay attention to AI backed revenue generation, so I’ve linked examples below: https://t.co/KPhReiBXQT ...

Financial Performance - PUMP's revenue engine has driven its FDV above $8 billion [1] Market Dynamics - PUMP's streaming virality contributes to its revenue engine [1] - The industry should pay attention to AI-backed revenue generation [1] - Building a traditional business & integrating buybacks would work [1]

Financial Performance - PUMP's fully diluted valuation (FDV) has exceeded $8 billion [1] - PUMP has an insane revenue engine [1] Business Strategy - Integrating buybacks into a traditional business model could be effective [1] - The industry should pay attention to AI-backed revenue generation [1]

Crypto Twitter (CT) Analysis - Crypto Twitter (CT) is characterized as an echo chamber with less than 100 thousand real users regularly active [1] - User growth on CT is not showing significant increase in the current cycle [1] Business & Revenue Generation - The prevailing consensus among builders is to generate consistent revenue without relying on incentives to prove product-market fit (PMF) [2] - Legitimate businesses prioritize consistent revenue generation [2] - Businesses targeting crypto-native audiences may succeed, but they are exceptions [2] - Expanding the total addressable market (TAM) beyond CT is crucial for growth [2] Product & Value - Generating revenue through a product that people actively use is more important than opinions from anonymous online profiles [3]

gigaverse pulled $2.7m from 77,000 players in 6 months. no vcs, no token pumps, just people paying for pixels. pudgy party skins trade at $5k. abstract chain processes 89m gaming transactions. base gaming generates more revenue than most defi protocols. market prices them like failed experiments. ...