Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Replimune Group, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Replimune securities between November 22, 2024, and July 21, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by September 22, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the IGNYTE trial, which the FDA deemed inadequate [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - A lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. and its senior executives for potential violations of federal securities laws related to its IPO and subsequent financial performance [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Investors have until September 30, 2025, to request to lead the case, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan [2]. - The lawsuit claims violations under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, concerning investors who purchased stock during Lineage's IPO on July 25, 2024 [2]. Group 2: Company Overview - Lineage, Inc. operates as a cold storage-focused real estate investment trust (REIT), owning and managing temperature-controlled storage facilities for perishable products [3]. Group 3: Allegations Against Lineage - The IPO documents claimed strong cash flows due to consistent cold chain demand, suggesting resilience during economic stress, while the reality was a downturn as customers destocked excess inventory from the pandemic [4]. - Following the IPO, Lineage's stock price fell from an initial $78 per share to approximately $40 per share, indicating a significant decline in market confidence [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fiserv, Inc. common stock between July 24, 2024, and July 22, 2025, of the September 22, 2025, deadline to serve as lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by September 22, 2025, to serve as lead plaintiff [2] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] Group 2: Allegations Against Fiserv - The lawsuit alleges that Fiserv made false and misleading statements regarding its Clover platform and the forced migration of Payeezy merchants [4] - It is claimed that Clover's revenue growth was artificially inflated due to these forced conversions, masking a slowdown in new merchant business [4] - The lawsuit further alleges that many former Payeezy merchants switched to competitors due to Clover's high pricing and compatibility issues, leading to a significant slowdown in Clover's growth [4]

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On July 16, 2025, Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: SRPT) announced a major restructuring that involves, in part, a 36% workforce reduction (500 employees) and other steps to annually save about $400 million. The company also agreed with the FDA to include a black box warning of acute liver injury and acute liver failure in Sarepta’s ELEVIDYS label. ELEVIDYS is the company’s gene therapy drug intended to treat a limited category of people with Duchenne muscular d ...

Core Viewpoint - Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. experienced a significant decline in share price following the report of a third patient death related to its experimental gene therapy drug, ELEVIDYS, leading to a 36% drop in stock value on July 18, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Company Developments - The company reported the death of a third patient treated with ELEVIDYS, resulting in shares closing down $7.89 [1]. - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Sarepta, representing investors who acquired securities between June 22, 2023, and June 24, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit focuses on Sarepta's disclosures regarding the safety and efficacy of ELEVIDYS, alleging that the company misled investors about the therapy's safety and potential for broader application [4]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Issues - The lawsuit claims that Sarepta made false statements and failed to disclose critical information, particularly regarding patient safety updates that began on March 18, 2025 [5]. - Following the initial death report, Sarepta halted recruitment and dosing in some clinical studies as requested by EU authorities [6]. - Subsequent deaths of patients treated with ELEVIDYS led to further regulatory scrutiny, including a safety communication from the FDA regarding acute liver failure risks [8]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Analyst Opinions - The financial press reported that following the lawsuit, H.C. Wainwright reduced its price target for Sarepta to $0, reflecting a loss of confidence in the company's future prospects [10]. - The investigation by Hagens Berman is focused on whether Sarepta misled investors about the safety and revenue potential of its gene therapies [11].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Replimune Group, Inc. following a significant drop in its stock price after the FDA rejected its drug application for RP1, intended for advanced melanoma treatment [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit, Jboor v. Replimune Group, Inc., seeks to represent investors who acquired Replimune securities between November 22, 2024, and July 21, 2025 [1][4]. - The lead plaintiff deadline for the lawsuit is set for September 22, 2025 [4]. Group 2: FDA Rejection and Market Reaction - Replimune's stock price plummeted by 77% on July 22, 2025, after the FDA issued a "complete response letter" rejecting the application for RP1, citing inadequacies in the IGNYTE trial [2][7]. - The FDA's letter indicated that the IGNYTE trial was not well-designed or controlled, leading to concerns about the drug's effectiveness [7][8]. Group 3: Allegations Against Replimune - The complaint alleges that Replimune made false and misleading statements regarding the IGNYTE trial's prospects and failed to disclose that the trial was likely deemed inadequate by the FDA [6][9]. - Replimune had previously portrayed an optimistic outlook for RP1, highlighting its Breakthrough Therapy designation and the potential for durable responses in patients [5][6]. Group 4: Investigation and Whistleblower Information - Hagens Berman is investigating whether Replimune misled investors about the IGNYTE trial design and data, urging affected investors to come forward [3][9]. - Whistleblowers with non-public information regarding Replimune are encouraged to assist in the investigation, with potential rewards under the SEC Whistleblower program [10].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of GeneDx Holdings Corp due to allegations of materially misleading business information [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Investigations - Shareholders who purchased GeneDx securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action without any out-of-pocket fees [2] - A report by Grizzly Research accused GeneDx of committing widespread fraud, claiming that its growth is an illusion driven by fraudulent schemes [3] Group 2: Stock Performance - Following the allegations from Grizzly Research, GeneDx's stock price fell by $4.84, or 6.7%, closing at $67.18 per share on February 5, 2025 [3] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Alto Neuroscience, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and the effectiveness of its product ALTO-100 during the Class Period from February 2, 2024, to October 22, 2024 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of purchasers of Alto's common stock during the IPO and the specified Class Period [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by September 19, 2025, to represent other class members [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Alto Neuroscience - Defendants allegedly made false statements about ALTO-100's effectiveness in treating major depressive disorder, overstating its clinical and commercial prospects [5]. - The lawsuit claims that Alto's business and financial prospects were also overstated due to these misleading statements [5]. - Investors reportedly suffered damages when the true details about the product and the company's prospects became public [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements and has a history of successful outcomes for its clients [4].

Core Viewpoint - Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. experienced a significant decline in share price following the report of a third patient death related to its experimental gene therapy, ELEVIDYS, leading to a 36% drop in stock value on July 18, 2025 [1]. Legal Developments - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Sarepta, representing investors who acquired securities between June 22, 2023, and June 24, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit focuses on Sarepta's disclosures regarding the safety and efficacy of ELEVIDYS, alleging that the company misled investors about the therapy's safety and potential for broader application [4]. Safety Concerns - The complaint highlights that Sarepta failed to disclose critical information regarding the safety of ELEVIDYS, with the first indication of issues arising on March 18, 2025, when a patient death was reported [5]. - Subsequent disclosures included a second patient death on June 15, 2025, and a safety communication from the FDA on June 24, 2025, which investigated the risk of acute liver failure associated with ELEVIDYS [7][8]. Regulatory Actions - Following the reported deaths, the FDA placed Sarepta's clinical trials for both ELEVIDYS and another investigational gene therapy, SRP-9004, on clinical hold [10]. - The company faced increased regulatory scrutiny and was compelled to halt patient recruitment and dosing in its clinical studies due to the severity of adverse events [8]. Financial Impact - The financial press reported a drastic reduction in Sarepta's price target to $0 by H.C. Wainwright following the adverse developments [10].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of KBR, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by KBR [1] Group 1: Investigation and Allegations - The investigation is prompted by KBR's announcement regarding the termination of HomeSafe Alliance's role in a significant contract with U.S. Transportation Command, which led to a notable decline in KBR's stock price [3] - KBR's stock fell by $3.85 per share, or 7.2%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025, following the announcement [3] Group 2: Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased KBR securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit without any out-of-pocket fees, facilitated by a contingency fee arrangement [2] - Interested investors can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the Rosen Law Firm directly [2] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4] - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]