Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Tempus AI, Inc. regarding the company's representation as an AI firm despite limited revenue generation from AI solutions [1] Company Overview - Tempus AI primarily generates revenue from acquisitions, genomic testing, and data licensing agreements rather than from AI solutions [1] - The company has emphasized its relationship with AstraZeneca, citing it as a long-term customer and an example of secure and expanding data licensing agreements [1] Recent Developments - Tempus announced an expanding contract with AstraZeneca through a joint venture involving Pathos AI, indicating efforts to enhance revenue growth [1] - A joint venture with SoftBank was also announced, aimed at entering the Japanese market to drive revenue growth [1] - The acquisition of Ambry Genetics is highlighted, with claims of high revenue potential attributed to strong relationships with healthcare providers [1]

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Twist Bioscience Corporation, alleging that insiders made materially false statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [1] Group 1 - The investigation is based on a federal securities lawsuit claiming that insiders at Twist Bioscience overstated the commercial viability of the company's synthetic DNA manufacturing technology [1] - The lawsuit also alleges that the company engaged in accounting fraud and used unsustainable pricing strategies to inflate its financial condition and prospects [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Dow class action lawsuit alleges that Dow Inc. and its executives made misleading statements regarding the company's financial health and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges, leading to significant investor losses during the specified class period [3][4][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Sarti v. Dow Inc., No. 25-cv-12744 (E.D. Mich.), and it involves purchasers of Dow securities from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until October 28, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1][6]. - The lawsuit claims that Dow overstated its ability to handle macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, which negatively impacted its business and financial condition [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit alleges that on June 23, 2025, BMO Capital downgraded Dow's stock from "Market Perform" to "Underperform," reducing the price target from $29.00 to $22.00, which was attributed to ongoing weakness in key markets [4]. - Following this downgrade, Dow's stock price fell by over 3% [4]. - On July 24, 2025, Dow reported a non-GAAP loss per share of $0.42, significantly worse than the expected loss of approximately $0.17 to $0.18, with net sales of $10.1 billion, a 7.3% year-over-year decline [5]. - Dow's CEO attributed the disappointing results to a challenging earnings environment and announced a dividend cut from $0.70 to $0.35 per share, leading to a stock price drop of over 17% [5]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Dow securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [6]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. and its executives for allegedly misleading investors about the company's advertising revenue and growth potential during the specified class period from April 29, 2025, to August 5, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that Snap's executives created a false impression of reliable information regarding expected advertising revenue while downplaying macroeconomic instability [3]. - On August 5, 2025, Snap reported disappointing second-quarter results, revealing a significant deceleration in advertising revenue, which led to a stock price drop of over 17% [4]. Group 2: Legal Process and Firm Background - Investors who purchased Snap securities during the class period can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm handling the case, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Charter Communications class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, which affected customer declines and revenue growth [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Sandoval v. Charter Communications, Inc., and it involves purchasers or acquirers of Charter Communications securities from July 26, 2024, to July 24, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until October 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1][5]. - The lawsuit claims that Charter Communications failed to manage the impact of the ACP ending, leading to significant customer declines and revenue issues [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On July 25, 2025, Charter Communications reported second quarter 2025 financial results, showing EBITDA of $5.7 billion, indicating a growth of 0.5% [4]. - The company experienced a decline of 117,000 Internet customers, with approximately 50,000 disconnects attributed to the end of the ACP [4]. - Following the financial results announcement, Charter Communications' stock price fell by more than 18% [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in the class action lawsuit and is recognized as a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation [6]. - The firm has secured over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases in 2024, ranking first in monetary relief for investors [6].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Microvast Holdings, Inc. related to misrepresentation and nondisclosure of critical information affecting shareholders [1]. Group 1: Allegations of Misconduct - Insiders at Microvast allegedly caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose that there was a reasonable likelihood of not being awarded the Department of Energy Grant after due diligence [2]. - It is claimed that negotiations for the Grant had ceased and the Grant was rescinded, which was not disclosed to shareholders [2]. - The company is accused of misrepresenting the nature and profitability of its businesses and partnerships, leading to materially misleading positive statements about its operations and prospects [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Charter Communications class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, which affected customer declines and revenue growth [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Sandoval v. Charter Communications, Inc., and it involves purchasers or acquirers of Charter Communications securities from July 26, 2024, to July 24, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until October 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Charter Communications failed to manage the impact of the ACP ending, leading to significant customer declines and revenue issues [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On July 25, 2025, Charter Communications reported second quarter 2025 financial results, showing EBITDA of $5.7 billion, reflecting a growth of 0.5% [4]. - The company experienced a decline of 117,000 Internet customers, with approximately 50,000 disconnects attributed to the end of the ACP [4]. - Following the financial results announcement, Charter Communications' stock price fell by more than 18% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Charter Communications securities during the Class Period to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in securing monetary relief for investors in securities class action cases for four out of the last five years [6].

MILWAUKEE, Aug. 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Ademi Firm is investigating SoHo House (NYSE: SHCO) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of law in its going-private transaction. Contacts Click here to learn how to join our investigation and obtain additional information or contact us at [email protected] or toll-free: 866-264-3995. There is no cost or obligation to you. Ademi & Fruchter LLP Guri Ademi Toll Free: (866) 264-3995 Fax: (414) 482-8001 Shareholders of SoHo House will receive ...

Core Viewpoint - The Charter Communications class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, which affected customer declines and revenue growth [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Sandoval v. Charter Communications, Inc., and covers purchasers or acquirers of Charter Communications securities from July 26, 2024, to July 24, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until October 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Charter Communications failed to manage the impact of the ACP ending, leading to significant customer declines and revenue issues [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On July 25, 2025, Charter Communications reported second quarter 2025 financial results, showing EBITDA of $5.7 billion, reflecting a growth of 0.5% [4]. - The company experienced a decline of 117,000 Internet customers, with approximately 50,000 disconnects attributed to the end of the ACP [4]. - Following the financial results announcement, Charter Communications' stock price fell by more than 18% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Representation - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Charter Communications securities during the Class Period to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Ademi Firm is investigating WideOpenWest for potential breaches of fiduciary duty and other legal violations related to its transaction with DigitalBridge Investments, which involves a significant cash payout to shareholders [1][3]. Transaction Details - Shareholders of WideOpenWest will receive $5.20 per share in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $1.5 billion [2]. - Crestview, the largest stockholder owning about 37% of WideOpenWest's outstanding shares, will roll over its existing holdings instead of receiving cash [2]. Board Conduct and Shareholder Rights - The transaction agreement imposes significant penalties on WideOpenWest for accepting competing bids, which raises concerns about the board's fulfillment of fiduciary duties to all shareholders [3]. - The investigation focuses on whether the board of directors is acting in the best interests of all shareholders amidst the change of control arrangements that provide substantial benefits to insiders [3].