Workflow
War
icon
Search documents
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-08-28 16:10
Poland has long been viewed as a central European country. But following Russia’s war in Ukraine, the country’s centre of gravity is starting to move north https://t.co/lwNdO4NUAt ...
X @Andrew Tate
Andrew Tate· 2025-08-27 16:40
RT THE WAR ROOM (@ReachTWR)You cannot fight any serious war alone.And you don't have to: https://t.co/3cOZ5ClM9P https://t.co/icO5HVHqyW ...
From Iron to Intelligence | Rajeev Bagga | TEDxKIET
TEDx Talks· 2025-08-25 14:53
Military Technology and Tactics - Military technology is transcendent and constantly changing, evolving from ancient weapons to AI and intercontinental ballistic missiles [4][5] - Modern warfare tactics, while advanced, still draw from past strategies, highlighting the importance of judicious application [6] - The industry emphasizes adaptability to current scenarios for the betterment of future generations, advocating for human control over technology [9] - Simple strategies and lessons from the past remain relevant, even in modern cyber warfare [10][11] Environmental and Human Impact of War - Warfare leaves emotional and environmental scars, necessitating a curbing of destructive technologies to protect the Earth [8] - The long-term impact of war on future generations includes physical signatures like war memorials and battlefields, serving as reminders of past conflicts [12] - Minimizing destruction requires diplomatic talks and a reduction in the lethality of weapons, emphasizing the importance of humanity [13][16] Military Leadership and Ethics - Military leadership requires adaptability, moral clarity, and prioritizing the protection of soldiers [19][20] - Leadership involves operating under stress, ensuring the well-being of subordinates, and integrating military ethos into planning [21][22] - The industry respects technology but cautions against allowing it to dominate military plans, emphasizing the importance of human judgment [23] Endurance and Legacy - Endurance, both physical and mental, is crucial for survival and adapting to challenging situations [17][18] - Actions taken today will shape the future, urging individuals to ensure their actions are beneficial for future generations [24]
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-08-25 13:40
Geopolitical Analysis - The report suggests the US president dislikes wars, potentially influencing foreign policy [1] - A "peacemaker" president may present new challenges in international relations [1]
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-08-24 12:00
The Generation-Z Palestinians who have posted online over 22 months of war have gained widespread attention around the world. A handful have millions of followers https://t.co/IcsgXh1zfG ...
X @The Wall Street Journal
From @WSJopinion: Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator’s flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal, writes Karl Rove https://t.co/HDBNU5Ng7N ...
Scott Horton: The Case Against War and the Military Industrial Complex | Lex Fridman Podcast #478
Lex Fridman· 2025-08-24 01:23
Podcast Overview - The Lex Fridman Podcast features Scott Horton, a critic of U S military interventionism, discussing topics from the Cold War to contemporary conflicts [1] - The podcast is supported by sponsors including Allio Capital, Hampton, BetterHelp, NetSuite, and AG1 [1] Episode Themes - Discussion spans historical events including the Cold War, the War on Terror, and specific conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria [1] - Topics include analysis of Bin Laden, the military-industrial complex, and geopolitical issues involving Iran and Israel-Palestine [1] Resources and Links - Listeners can find supplemental notes, corrections, and links to Scott Horton's X (formerly Twitter), YouTube channels, Substack, website, and books [1] - Podcast links are provided for Apple Podcasts, Spotify, RSS feed, and YouTube playlists, along with social media links for Lex Fridman [1]
Are Putin, Russia Misleading President Trump?
Bloomberg Television· 2025-08-22 22:15
Geopolitical Analysis - The analysis suggests that Vladimir Putin holds the most power to end the war in Ukraine, but President Trump is the next most influential figure [1][2] - The report indicates that increased pressure on the Kremlin, including sanctions and providing weapons to Ukraine, is necessary [3] - The analysis mentions that Russia may be misleading the US President regarding negotiations and intentions [8] - The report highlights China's observation of the situation, raising concerns about potential actions against Taiwan or NATO allies [14][15] Sanctions and Trade Implications - The report suggests that threatening sanctions against Russia could be effective, referencing a past instance where it prompted Putin to meet [6] - The analysis points out the complexities of imposing sanctions on China and India due to potential conflicts with US trade goals [16][17] - The report suggests that sanctions on China for purchasing oil and gas from Russia could impact the overall US-China tariff deal [17] Security Guarantees and NATO - The analysis discusses the possibility of providing Ukraine with an Article 5-like agreement or including them in NATO [10][11] - The report mentions that Ukraine desires foreign troops to guarantee peace and an Article 5 guarantee against future Russian attacks [13]
X @Mike Benz
Mike Benz· 2025-08-22 19:47
find you a woman who loves you as much as John Bolton loves cooking up reasons to go to war https://t.co/lc0Tt3olLT ...
‘The Russians aren’t serious about wanting peace’ in Ukraine, fmr. diplomat warns
NBC News· 2025-08-21 21:43
Geopolitical Analysis - Russia is setting conditions that delay any potential meeting between Presidents Putin and Zelensky, indicating a lack of seriousness about peace [1][11] - The Kremlin uses propaganda to question Zelensky's legitimacy as president due to the ongoing martial law and absence of new elections in Ukraine [2] - Zelensky reports nearly 600 drone and 40 missile attacks by Russia, including one on an American-owned factory, showing no sign of meaningful negotiations [3] - The White House claims that behind-the-scenes efforts are being made to plan a meeting between Russian and Ukrainian officials, brokered by the United States [6] - The US is considering severe consequences for Russia, including a clear open-ended commitment to Ukraine's defense, military aid, and intelligence [13] - The US made a tactical error by embracing Putin's approach of seeking a peace deal before a ceasefire, prolonging the war [17] - The primary concern is whether the US will withdraw support for Ukraine's defense, which is crucial for achieving a ceasefire and eventual peace [20] - The conflict's outcome has global implications, potentially encouraging other nations to acquire territory by force, such as China's stance on Taiwan [21][22] US Policy & Diplomacy - The White House is not publicly responding to Russia's bombardment of an American business or the Russian foreign minister's comments [6] - The US is letting diplomacy play out, remaining hopeful that it can push for a meeting between Russia and Ukraine [10] - There is a narrative that even if additional sanctions were imposed on Russia, they might not have much of an impact [9] - The US should focus on providing Ukraine with the means to defend itself and increase the costs of war for Russia [17]