Core Viewpoint - 3D Systems Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to significant financial losses and misleading statements made by the company regarding its business performance and outlook during the Class Period from August 13, 2024, to May 12, 2025 [1][5]. Financial Performance - On March 26, 2025, 3D Systems reported its Q4 and full-year 2024 results, missing consensus estimates for non-GAAP earnings-per-share and sales revenue, attributing the shortfall to lower hardware systems sales caused by macroeconomic factors [2]. - The company experienced a revenue reduction of $9 million in Q4 due to changes in accounting estimates related to its Regenerative Medicine program [2]. - Following this announcement, the stock price dropped by $0.57, or 21%, closing at $2.15 per share on March 27, 2025 [2]. - On May 12, 2025, 3D Systems released its Q1 2025 results, again missing estimates, primarily due to a decline in material sales linked to inventory management issues in its Healthcare Solutions segment [3]. - The company withdrew its full-year 2025 outlook, citing ongoing softness in customer capital spending and macroeconomic uncertainty [3]. - The stock price fell further by $0.68, or 26.6%, closing at $1.87 per share on May 13, 2025 [4]. Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit alleges that 3D Systems made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about its business and prospects during the Class Period [5]. - Specific allegations include the understatement of the impact of weakened customer spending and the overstatement of the company's resilience in challenging conditions [5]. - The lawsuit claims that the updated milestone criteria in the United Partnership negatively affected the revenue from the Regenerative Medicine Program [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited [2] - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years [2] - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, affecting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false or lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has a strong track record in high-stakes securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Rocket Companies, Inc. due to alleged securities fraud affecting investors between March 29, 2021, and April 1, 2021 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Rocket's gain on sale margins were contracting at the highest rate in two years due to increased competition among mortgage lenders and a shift towards lower margin segments [2]. - It is alleged that Rocket was engaged in a price war with competitors in the wholesale market, further compressing margins in its Partner Network operating segment [2]. - The complaint states that adverse trends were accelerating, with Rocket's gain on sale margins expected to drop by at least 140 basis points in the first half of 2021 [2]. - The favorable market conditions that previously allowed Rocket to achieve high gain on sale margins had disappeared, returning to levels not seen since Q1 2019 [2]. - The company's gain-on-sale margins had fallen materially below recent historical averages, contradicting positive statements made by the defendants about the company's operations and prospects [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the relevant time frame have until July 8, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation does not require this [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Bitfarms Ltd. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between March 21, 2023, and December 9, 2024 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Misstatements - The lawsuit claims that Bitfarms had inadequate internal controls over financial reporting [2]. - It is alleged that the company misclassified proceeds from the sale of digital assets, categorizing them as cash flow from operating activities instead of investing activities [2]. - The complaint states that Bitfarms overstated its ability to remediate material weaknesses in its internal controls related to the classification of the 2021 Warrants [2]. - Due to these errors, various items in previously issued financial statements were misstated, leading to the conclusion that these financial statements were inaccurate and may require restatement [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses in Bitfarms Ltd. during the specified timeframe have until July 8, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, and participation does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Apple Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding the integration of advanced AI-based Siri features into its devices, which may impact iPhone 16 sales and the company's financial prospects [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of investors who purchased Apple securities between June 10, 2024, and June 9, 2025 [1]. - The lead plaintiff deadline for the lawsuit is August 19, 2025 [1][3]. - The complaint alleges that Apple misrepresented the timeline for integrating advanced AI features, leading to overstated business and financial prospects [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Apple - The complaint claims that Apple failed to disclose that the advanced AI-based Siri features were unlikely to be available for the iPhone 16 [2]. - It is alleged that the absence of these features would negatively affect iPhone 16 sales [2]. - As a result of these issues, Apple's public statements were deemed materially false and misleading throughout the class period [2]. Group 3: Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors can seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class by the deadline or may choose to remain absent [3]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest in the case [3]. - The lead plaintiff will select counsel to represent the class, and participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any recovery [3].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Civitas Resources, Inc. for failing to disclose significant production reductions and operational challenges during the Class Period from February 27, 2024, to February 24, 2025 [1][3]. Company Overview - Civitas Resources, Inc. is a crude oil and natural gas company headquartered in Denver [2]. Financial Performance - For Q4 and full-year 2024, Civitas reported revenue of $1.29 billion, missing consensus estimates by $3.44 million, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.78, which was $0.21 below expectations [4]. - The net income for the quarter was $151.1 million, or $1.57 per share, a decline from $302.9 million, or $3.23 per share, in the same quarter the previous year [4]. Operational Challenges - Civitas indicated that it is likely to significantly reduce oil production in 2025 due to natural declines after peak production in the DJ Basin in Q4 2024 [3]. - The company announced a 10% workforce reduction and the termination of its Chief Operating Officer and Chief Transformation Officer [5]. Market Reaction - Following the announcement of its financial results and operational outlook, Civitas's stock price fell by $8.95 per share, or 18%, closing at $40.35 per share on February 25, 2025 [6].

NEW YORK, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Fortrea Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: FTRE) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Fortrea you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting https://www.bfalaw.com/cases-investigations/fortrea-holdings-inc-class-action-lawsuit. Investors have until August 1, 2025, to ask th ...

Core Viewpoint - A lawsuit has been filed against Civitas Resources, Inc. and its senior executives for potential violations of federal securities laws, specifically related to misleading statements about the company's production capabilities and financial health [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, titled Lin v. Civitas Resources, et al., No. 25-cv-03791, and claims are made under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [2]. - Investors have until July 1, 2025, to request to be appointed to lead the case [2]. Group 2: Company Background - Civitas Resources is an oil and gas exploration and production company with key assets in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado and the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico [3]. - The company claimed to have "enhanced recovery potential" and "driven production ahead of plans," while asserting that costs were below expectations [3]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - On February 24, 2025, Civitas announced disappointing Q4 and full year 2024 results, revealing that oil production had peaked and would require significant capital investment to increase production [4]. - Following the announcement, Civitas's stock price dropped over 18%, from $49.30 per share to $40.35 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status in a class action lawsuit by July 21, 2025 [3][5]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify misled investors by failing to disclose that customers were shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its high-margin Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [5]. - The complaint states that competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [5]. - Allegations include that DoubleVerify systematically overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots, and that risk disclosures were materially false and misleading [5]. Group 2: Impact of Allegations - The truth about DoubleVerify's financial struggles was revealed on February 27, 2025, when the company reported lower-than-expected sales and earnings, leading to a significant stock price drop of $7.83 per share, or 36%, from $21.73 to $13.90 [6]. - The decline in stock price was attributed to reduced customer spending and the suspension of services by a major client, alongside the shift of ad dollars impacting the company negatively [6]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The lead plaintiff in the class action will be the investor with the largest financial interest who is typical of class members, overseeing the litigation on behalf of the class [7]. - Any member of the class can move to serve as lead plaintiff or remain an absent class member without affecting their ability to share in any recovery [7].

Core Viewpoint - A lawsuit has been filed against Civitas Resources, Inc. and its senior executives for potential violations of federal securities laws, alleging misleading statements regarding the company's production capabilities and costs [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, titled Lin v. Civitas Resources, et al., No. 25-cv-03791, with claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [2]. - Investors have until July 1, 2025, to request to be appointed to lead the case [2]. Group 2: Company Background - Civitas Resources is an oil and gas exploration and production company with key assets in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado and the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico [3]. - The company claimed to have "enhanced recovery potential" and reduced operating costs, but the lawsuit alleges that actual production peaked in 2024, requiring significant capital for further production [3]. Group 3: Stock Performance - Following the announcement of disappointing Q4 and full year 2024 results on February 24, 2025, Civitas's stock price fell over 18%, from $49.30 to $40.35 per share [4]. - The company also announced a 10% workforce reduction and the immediate firing of its Chief Operating Officer and Chief Transformation Officer [4].