Deadline Alert: Alight, Inc. (ALIT) Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit Mar 23, 2026 1:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time Deadline Alert: Alight, Inc. (ALIT) Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit Share LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLPreminds investors of the upcoming May 15, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Power Solutions International, Inc. for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from May 8, 2025, to March 2, 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for all individuals and entities that purchased or acquired Power Solutions securities during the specified Class Period [2]. - The complaint alleges that the defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [3]. - Specific allegations include overstating the company's ability to capture sales demand in the data center market and understating the impact of manufacturing capacity enhancements [8]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who suffered losses in Power Solutions have until May 19, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although sharing in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [3]. - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful [4]. Group 3: Firm Background - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm specializing in securities fraud class actions and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [5]. - The firm's focus is on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability to maintain market integrity [5].

Core Viewpoint - Richtech Robotics Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly misleading investors about its relationship with Microsoft, which has resulted in significant stock price declines [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Diez v. Richtech Robotics Inc. and is filed in the District of Nevada [1]. - Investors who purchased Richtech Robotics securities between January 27, 2026, and January 29, 2026, can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff by April 3, 2026 [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Richtech Robotics falsely claimed a commercial relationship with Microsoft during the class period [3]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the publication of an article by Hunterbrook Media on January 29, 2026, which denied any partnership with Microsoft, Richtech Robotics Class B stock fell more than 29% over two trading days [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in this class action lawsuit and is recognized as a leading law firm in securities fraud litigation [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone and $8.4 billion over the past five years [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against monday.com Ltd. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, focusing on misleading statements regarding the company's financial outlook and growth projections [1][4]. Company Overview - monday.com Ltd. develops software applications and is publicly traded on NASDAQ under the ticker MNDY [3]. Allegations - The lawsuit claims that monday.com and its executives made false or misleading statements about the company's revenue outlook and growth potential, particularly regarding its $1.8 billion target for 2027 [4]. - It is alleged that the company failed to disclose a deceleration in new customer growth, weaker expansion within existing accounts, and longer sales cycles, which contributed to the unrealistic nature of its growth projections [4]. - On February 9, 2026, monday.com announced it would no longer discuss its 2027 targets, leading to a nearly 21% drop in stock price [5]. Legal Process - Investors who suffered losses and wish to lead the class action must file a motion by May 11, 2026, and can select a law firm of their choice for representation [2][6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from August 5, 2025, to March 4, 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased Grocery Outlet securities during the specified Class Period [2]. - The Complaint alleges that the Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the Company's business and operations [3]. - Specific allegations include rapid expansion by opening too many new stores, artificial support of financial growth through accelerated store openings, inability to achieve sustainable growth, and the need for further optimization of the restructuring plan, including store closures and asset write-downs [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors wishing to join the lawsuit can review the Complaint on the law firm's website and have until May 15, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [4]. - Participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful [5]. - The firm has a strong track record in recovering significant amounts for investors in securities fraud class actions [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the development progress of certain projects, particularly the Brook Mine in Wyoming [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors are encouraged to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives by the deadline of March 31, 2026 [2]. Group 2: Allegations - The complaint claims that Ramaco overstated development progress at the Brook Mine, which was described as a "hoax" and a "Potemkin Mine" by Wolfpack Research [3]. - The report indicated that no significant mining activity had occurred since the groundbreaking, supported by drone footage and site visits [3]. Group 3: Market Reaction - Following the revelation of the allegations, Ramaco's stock price dropped by $3.81, nearly 10%, closing at $36.01 per share with unusually high trading volume [4].

Core Viewpoint - Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with significant financial losses reported during the class period from November 5, 2025, to February 26, 2026 [1][3]. Company Performance - Eos Energy reported full year 2025 revenue of $114.2 million, which was significantly below its guidance of $150 million to $160 million [4]. - The company experienced a gross loss of $143.8 million and a net loss attributable to shareholders of $969.6 million for the same period [4]. - An adjusted EBITDA loss of $219.1 million was also reported, alongside a delay in reaching a capacity milestone by five weeks [4]. Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Eos Energy made false or misleading statements regarding its production capabilities and capacity utilization, which were below industry norms [3]. - It is claimed that the company faced significant downtime in its battery line and delays in achieving quality targets for its automated production [3]. - The lawsuit further asserts that Eos Energy's internal systems were inadequate, leading to inaccurate public disclosures [3]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Eos Energy securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [5]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, making it one of the largest plaintiffs' firms globally [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Trip.com Group Limited is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements and failure to disclose regulatory risks associated with its monopolistic practices [1][4]. Company Overview - Trip.com operates as a travel service provider, offering services such as accommodation reservations, transportation ticketing, packaged tours, in-destination services, and corporate travel management [3]. Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, Trip.com and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant regulatory risks due to monopolistic business activities [4]. - A Bloomberg article published on January 14, 2026, reported that China is investigating Trip.com for alleged antitrust conduct, which led to a 19% drop in the price of Trip.com American Depositary Shares over two trading sessions [5]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [6].

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania--(Newsfile Corp. - March 23, 2026) - National plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC announces a class action lawsuit against Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN) ("Navan" or the "Company") on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired Navan shares during the period from October 28, 2025 through February 23, 2026 (the "Class Period"), including in or traceable to the Company's October 2025 initial public offering ("IPO").Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased or acquired Navan secu ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Enphase Energy, Inc. for allegedly making false statements and failing to disclose critical information regarding its financial and operational outlook during the specified Class Period [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who acquired Enphase securities from April 22, 2025, to October 28, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors have until April 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representative of the class [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Enphase - The complaint alleges that Enphase overstated its ability to manage channel inventory levels [3]. - It is claimed that Enphase exaggerated its capacity to mitigate business impacts from the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit [3]. - Consequently, Enphase is accused of overstating its financial and operational outlook [3]. Group 3: Impact of the Allegations - The truth about Enphase's situation was revealed on October 28, 2025, when the company reported disappointing third-quarter results and warned of a weak year-end due to high channel inventory and reduced battery storage shipments [4]. - Following this announcement, Enphase's stock price dropped by $5.56 per share, or 15.15%, closing at $31.14 on October 29, 2025 [5].