Core Insights - The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG) both aim to track the S&P 500 Index, providing diversified access to large-cap U.S. equities [1][7] Cost & Size Comparison - SPLG has a lower expense ratio of 0.02% compared to IVV's 0.03% [2][8] - Both funds have a 1-year return of 18.3% as of October 28, 2025, and a dividend yield of 1.16% [2] - SPLG's assets under management (AUM) stand at $86.83 billion, while IVV has a significantly larger AUM of $701.37 billion [2][3] Performance & Risk Metrics - The maximum drawdown over five years for SPLG is 24.49%, while IVV's is slightly higher at 24.52% [4] - An investment of $1,000 would grow to $2,092 in SPLG and $2,091 in IVV over five years [4] Portfolio Composition - IVV holds 503 securities with a sector exposure of 36% in technology, 13% in financial services, and 10% in consumer discretionary [5] - Top holdings in IVV include Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, each representing less than 10% of the portfolio [5] - SPLG mirrors IVV's sector weights and portfolio makeup, despite being from a different issuer [6]

Core Insights - The Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) focuses on growth companies within the S&P 500, while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) provides exposure to both growth and value stocks [1] Summary by Category Performance Metrics - VOOG has a 1-year return of 28.6% compared to VOO's 18.3% as of October 28, 2025 [2] - Over five years, a $1,000 investment in VOOG would grow to $2,200, while the same investment in VOO would grow to $2,083 [4] Expense and Yield - VOOG has an expense ratio of 0.07%, higher than VOO's 0.03% [2] - The dividend yield for VOOG is 0.49%, while VOO offers a higher yield of 1.15% [2] Risk and Volatility - VOOG has a maximum drawdown of -32.73% over five years, compared to VOO's -24.52% [4] - VOOG has a beta of 1.03, indicating slightly higher volatility compared to VOO's beta of 1.00 [2] Holdings and Sector Allocation - VOO holds 504 stocks, with technology as the largest sector at 35%, followed by financial services at 14% and consumer discretionary at 11% [5] - VOOG focuses on 217 growth stocks, with a heavier concentration in technology (43%), communication services (15%), and consumer discretionary (12%) [6] Historical Performance - Over the last 10 years, VOOG has averaged a return of 17.49% per year, outperforming VOO's average of 15.26% [8] Investment Considerations - VOO is broader and more diversified, making it suitable for risk-averse investors seeking stability [7] - VOOG's focus on growth stocks positions it for substantial growth, albeit with more short-term volatility [9]

BondBloxx ETFs Co-Founder Tony Kelly sits down with CNBC’s Dominic Chu for “ETF Edge” to talk about the evolving space of bond investing. Kelly says he’s seeing a more granular view of fixed income exposures in clients’ portfolios. TrueShares ETFs CEO Mike Loukas joins the conversation. ...

Core Insights - The Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) launched on June 8, 2022, aims to provide broad exposure to the Technology - Broad segment of the equity market [1] - The ETF has gained popularity among retail and institutional investors due to its low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency [1] Fund Overview - TRFK is sponsored by Pacer ETFs and has accumulated over $203.34 million in assets, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [3] - The fund seeks to match the performance of the PACER DATA TRANSMISN & COMM REVOLUTN INDEX, focusing on companies deriving at least 50% of their revenues from data-related activities [4] Cost Structure - The annual operating expense ratio for TRFK is 0.49%, which is competitive with most peer products in the ETF space [5] Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation in the Information Technology sector, comprising approximately 92.3% of the portfolio [6] - Broadcom Inc (AVGO) is the largest holding at about 10.02%, followed by Nvidia Corp (NVDA) and Oracle Corp (ORCL) [6] - The top 10 holdings represent around 57.39% of total assets under management [7] Performance Metrics - As of October 2, 2025, TRFK has returned approximately 35.27% year-to-date and 49.25% over the past year [8] - The fund has traded between $38.975 and $68.34 in the last 52 weeks, with a beta of 1.29 and a standard deviation of 27.58% over the trailing three-year period [8] Investment Alternatives - TRFK holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating strong potential for investors seeking exposure to Technology ETFs [9] - Other notable ETFs in the sector include Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) with $90.65 billion in assets and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) with $108.42 billion [10]

Core Insights - The ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market and has assets over $557 million, making it an average-sized ETF in this category [1] - Large cap companies, with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are considered more stable and less volatile compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - The ETF has an annual operating expense of 0.25% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.7% [3] Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has the heaviest allocation to the Energy sector, with a significant portion of the portfolio dedicated to it, followed by Industrials and Materials [4] - The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) accounts for approximately 9.77% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 91.65% of total assets under management [5] Performance Metrics - EQL aims to match the performance of the NYSE Select Sector Equal Weight Index, which includes various sectors such as Consumer Discretionary, Technology, and Health Care [6] - The ETF has returned roughly 10.72% year-to-date and 13.36% over the past year, with a trading range between $37.36 and $45.87 in the last 52 weeks [7] - It has a beta of 0.91 and a standard deviation of 14.44% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [7] Alternatives and Market Position - EQL holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating favorable expected returns and expense ratios [8] - Other ETFs in the same space include iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), which have significantly larger assets of $674.11 billion and $749.17 billion respectively, both with an expense ratio of 0.03% [9] Investment Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [10]

Core Viewpoint - The Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is a passively managed ETF that provides broad exposure to the Consumer Staples sector, which is currently ranked at the bottom 0% among Zacks sectors [2][3]. Group 1: Fund Overview - Launched on December 16, 1998, XLP has amassed over $15.98 billion in assets, making it the largest ETF in the Consumer Staples - Broad segment [3]. - The fund aims to match the performance of the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, which represents the consumer staples sector of the S&P 500 Index [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - XLP has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.08%, making it the least expensive product in its category, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.52% [4]. - The ETF has gained approximately 2.93% year-to-date but is down about 1.98% over the past year, trading between $76.23 and $84.26 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 3: Holdings and Sector Exposure - The ETF is fully allocated to the Consumer Staples sector, with Walmart Inc (WMT) making up about 9.98% of total assets, followed by Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) and Procter & Gamble Co (PG) [5][6]. - The top 10 holdings constitute approximately 60.76% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - XLP has a beta of 0.54 and a standard deviation of 12.36% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [7]. - The ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a sufficient option for investors seeking exposure to the Consumer Staples sector [8]. Other alternatives include Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) [9].

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a leading option for investors seeking broad exposure to the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $666.80 billion, making it the largest ETF in this category [1]. Group 1: Large Cap Blend Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Blend ETFs, like IVV, combine both growth and value stocks, showcasing qualities of both investment styles [2]. Group 2: Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for IVV are 0.03%, positioning it as one of the least expensive ETFs in the market [3]. - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.22% [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - IVV has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising approximately 33.6% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [4]. - Nvidia Corp (NVDA) represents about 8.16% of total assets, with Microsoft Corp (MSFT) and Apple Inc (AAPL) also among the top holdings; the top 10 holdings account for around 38.51% of total assets [5]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - IVV aims to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 Index, having increased by about 11.65% year-to-date and approximately 20.41% over the past year as of September 10, 2025 [6]. - The ETF has traded between $498.80 and $653.62 in the past 52 weeks [6]. Group 5: Risk Assessment - With a beta of 1.00 and a standard deviation of 16.46% over the trailing three-year period, IVV is classified as a medium risk investment [7]. - The ETF holds around 508 different securities, effectively diversifying company-specific risk [7]. Group 6: Alternatives and Market Position - IVV holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating strong expected returns, low expense ratios, and positive momentum [8]. - Other ETFs tracking the same index include the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) with $658.03 billion in assets and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) with $740.20 billion; SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03% [9][10]. Group 7: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like IVV are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Insights - The Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is a passively managed ETF launched on October 21, 2013, designed to provide broad exposure to the financial sector of the equity market [1][3] - FNCL has amassed over $2.35 billion in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in the Financials - Broad segment [3] - The ETF has a low expense ratio of 0.08% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.46% [4] Index Details - FNCL aims to match the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index before fees and expenses [3] - The MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index represents the performance of the financial sector in the U.S. equity market [3] Sector Exposure and Top Holdings - FNCL has a 100% allocation in the Financials sector, providing diversified exposure [5] - The top three holdings are Jpmorgan Chase + Co (8.82%), Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK.B), and Bank Of America Corp (BAC), with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 40.98% of total assets [6] Performance and Risk - FNCL has increased by about 11.49% year-to-date and approximately 22.65% over the past year as of September 10, 2025 [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.03 and a standard deviation of 18.68% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [7] Alternatives - FNCL carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a reasonable option for investors seeking exposure to the Financials ETFs area [8] - Other alternatives include Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) with $12.89 billion in assets and Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) with $54.53 billion in assets [9]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares U.S. Transportation ETF (IYT) offers investors a low-cost, transparent, and flexible option for gaining exposure to the Industrials - Transportation/Shipping segment of the equity market, making it suitable for long-term investment strategies [1][2]. Group 1: ETF Overview - The iShares U.S. Transportation ETF was launched on October 6, 2003, and is passively managed [1]. - The fund is sponsored by Blackrock and has assets exceeding $602.26 million, categorizing it as an average-sized ETF [3]. - IYT aims to match the performance of the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index before fees and expenses [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.39%, positioning it among the cheaper options in the market [5]. - It offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.07% [5]. - Year-to-date, IYT has returned approximately 4.92%, with a one-year return of about 7.73% as of September 10, 2025 [8]. - The fund has traded between $55.22 and $75.4 over the past 52 weeks [8]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF is fully allocated to the Industrials sector, with about 100% of its portfolio [6]. - Uber Technologies Inc (UBER) constitutes approximately 23.11% of total assets, followed by Union Pacific Corp (UNP) and United Airlines Holdings Inc (UAL) [7]. - The top 10 holdings represent about 74.7% of total assets under management [7]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - IYT has a beta of 1.22 and a standard deviation of 22.17% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a higher risk profile compared to peers [8]. - The ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a reasonable option for investors seeking exposure to the Industrials ETFs area [9]. - Alternatives include the SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS), with respective assets of $143.30 million and $817.26 million [10].

Core Insights - The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is a passively managed fund launched on October 23, 2000, with assets exceeding $22.02 billion, targeting the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market [1] Group 1: Fund Characteristics - OEF is designed to provide broad exposure to large-cap companies, typically with market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering stability and reliable cash flows compared to mid and small-cap companies [2] - The ETF has annual operating expenses of 0.2% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.88%, making it competitive within its peer group [3] Group 2: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation of approximately 40.1% to the Information Technology sector, with Telecom and Financials following as the next largest sectors [4] - Nvidia Corp (NVDA) is the largest holding at about 11.42% of total assets, with Microsoft Corp (MSFT) and Apple Inc (AAPL) also among the top three holdings; the top 10 holdings represent about 53.53% of total assets [5] Group 3: Performance Metrics - OEF aims to match the performance of the S&P 100 Index, which includes blue-chip stocks and represents about 45% of the market capitalization of listed U.S. equities [6] - The ETF has returned approximately 11.1% year-to-date and 18.9% over the past year, with a trading range between $240.38 and $322.43 in the last 52 weeks; it has a beta of 1.01 and a standard deviation of 17.43% over the trailing three years, indicating medium risk [7] Group 4: Alternatives and Market Position - OEF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected returns and favorable expense ratios, making it a solid choice for investors interested in the Large Cap Blend segment [8] - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), with assets of $661.34 billion and $725.27 billion respectively, both having an expense ratio of 0.03% [9] Group 5: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like OEF are increasingly popular among retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [10]