Core Viewpoint - Value stocks are expected to outperform growth stocks in 2026 as investors shift focus towards cheaper, less risky assets amid concerns over high valuations in technology and AI sectors [1][2]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Recent market trends indicate a rotation towards value stocks, with value indices outperforming growth benchmarks in late 2025 [1]. - The breadth of the market rally is expanding, with gains now coming from financials, industrials, and consumer sectors rather than being concentrated in a few large tech firms [3][4]. - The equal-weighted S&P 500 has outperformed its cap-weighted counterpart, highlighting the strength of smaller and mid-sized companies [3]. Group 2: Economic Conditions - Favorable macroeconomic conditions, including potential interest rate cuts by the Fed in early 2026, could lower borrowing costs for banks and consumer-facing businesses, supporting value stocks [5]. - Productivity gains from AI are expected to enhance corporate earnings across various sectors that have not yet benefited from the AI boom [5][6]. - Stronger productivity growth could allow the economy to expand at a real rate of 2.5% without inflation issues, providing a tailwind for value-oriented strategies [6]. Group 3: Investment Strategy - While value stocks are attractively priced, investors need to be selective, as lower valuations do not guarantee outperformance [7]. - Small caps are trading at a significant discount to large caps, but careful stock selection is essential to identify which companies can leverage favorable conditions into stronger profits [8]. - Banks and consumer discretionary firms are highlighted as sectors of interest, but discerning stock selection will be critical as the market rotation progresses [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Medical - Biomedical and Genetics sector should consider Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (KROS) and argenex SE (ARGX) for potential value opportunities, with KROS appearing to offer better value at this time [1]. Valuation Metrics - KROS has a forward P/E ratio of 9.16, significantly lower than ARGX's forward P/E of 47.56, indicating KROS may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for KROS is 0.25, while ARGX has a PEG ratio of 0.87, suggesting KROS has a more favorable earnings growth outlook relative to its price [5]. - KROS's P/B ratio is 0.89, compared to ARGX's P/B of 8.41, further indicating KROS's stock may be undervalued relative to its book value [6]. Earnings Estimate Revisions - KROS has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), reflecting positive earnings estimate revisions, while ARGX has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating less favorable earnings outlook [3][7]. - The stronger estimate revision activity for KROS suggests a more optimistic earnings outlook compared to ARGX, making KROS a more attractive option for value investors [7].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes that investors do not necessarily need to focus solely on tech-oriented growth stocks to achieve market-beating returns, as value stocks can also provide compelling returns when purchased at the right time [2]. Group 1: Investment Focus - iREIT+HOYA Capital is highlighted as a premier income-focused investing service that targets income-producing asset classes, aiming for sustainable portfolio income, diversification, and inflation hedging [1][2]. - The investment group offers high-yield, dividend growth ideas, focusing on defensive stocks with a medium- to long-term investment horizon [2]. - The portfolios provided by iREIT+HOYA Capital target dividend yields of up to 10%, covering various asset classes including REITs, ETFs, closed-end funds, preferreds, and dividend champions [2].

Market Outlook - The current December is viewed as the Santa Claus rally, with expectations for a broadening market in 2026, indicating a rotation from high-performing sectors to those that have underperformed [2][6] - The market is anticipated to shift towards value and dividend stocks, as well as small-cap stocks, rather than continuing to favor mega-cap tech stocks [6] Sector Performance - Dividend and value stocks, represented by ETFs like the S&P Spider 500 high dividend ETF and Schwab large cap value ETF, have underperformed the S&P 500 this month, despite expectations for a potential catch-up in performance [3][5] - Consumer staples and discretionary sectors, along with energy, are highlighted as areas that have not performed well but may present interesting opportunities due to lower valuations [5] Commodities Market - The metals market, particularly gold and silver, is viewed as having peaked, with the best performance in nearly 50 years, suggesting that current investments in these commodities may be chasing momentum rather than value [8] - The recommendation is to take profits in gold and silver rather than investing new capital [9] Technology Sector - The tech sector is expected to remain positive, but growth may not be as robust as in previous years, with a notable rotation among the MAG 7 stocks, where five have underperformed the S&P 500 [10][11] - Companies like Meta and Microsoft are anticipated to perform better in the upcoming year, while Google is expected to see less impressive growth compared to this year [11][12]

Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs: State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), highlighting their differing investment strategies and performance metrics [4][5]. Group 1: ETF Characteristics - SPTM offers broader exposure with 1,510 U.S. stocks across all market capitalizations, focusing heavily on technology (34%), financial services (13%), and consumer cyclicals (11%) [1]. - VTV targets large-cap value stocks, with significant allocations in financial services (25%), healthcare (15%), and industrials (13%), holding 331 positions [2]. - SPTM has a growth-oriented tilt, resulting in higher recent returns but also larger drawdowns compared to VTV, which is more defensive and income-focused [5][6]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - Since 2004, SPTM has delivered an annual total return growth of 10.2%, while VTV has achieved 9.3%. Over the last decade, SPTM's growth was 14.5% compared to VTV's 11.8% [6]. - Both ETFs slightly lagged behind the S&P 500, which rose 14.7% annually over the same period [6]. - VTV offers a higher dividend yield of 2.1%, one percentage point more than SPTM, appealing to income-focused investors [3][5]. Group 3: Investment Considerations - SPTM includes 1,000 additional stocks compared to the S&P 500, providing better market breadth, while its allocation to the "Magnificent Seven" is lower at 34% compared to 38% for the S&P 500 [7]. - VTV avoids many high-profile tech stocks, focusing instead on steady dividend-paying stocks, which may be appealing in a volatile market [8]. - The choice between SPTM and VTV ultimately depends on individual investor preferences, with VTV being favored for its income potential and lower risk profile [9].

Market Overview - Value stocks have shown signs of life, outperforming the market in the current quarter, with S&P value leading [1][2] - Only two of the FAANG stocks have outperformed the market this year, indicating a shift in market dynamics [2] Investment Strategy - Investors are advised to stay invested and avoid trying to time the market, focusing on less popular sectors that are not leading the market [3][5] - Healthcare is highlighted as a favorable sector due to its affordability and lower economic sensitivity, making it a good option if the economy slows [3][5] Stock Picks - UPS and Kimberly Clark are identified as attractive investment opportunities, both down nearly 50% from their highs, with Kimberly Clark offering a PE of 12 compared to its usual 19 and a safe dividend yield of 5% [6][10] - UPS has seen a significant drop of 60% from its highs, but the company is moving away from its reliance on Amazon, which could improve its performance [11] Market Trends - There is a belief that the current inflationary environment will persist, similar to trends seen in the 1970s, which could benefit materials and commodities [13]

Core Viewpoint - The State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is a significant player in the Small Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with over $4.19 billion in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1] Group 1: ETF Overview - SLYV is a passively managed ETF launched on September 25, 2000, sponsored by State Street Investment Management [1] - The ETF has an annual operating expense of 0.15%, positioning it as one of the least expensive options in the market [4] - It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.08% [4] Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present higher potential returns but also increased risks [2] - Value stocks, which SLYV focuses on, typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but also lower sales and earnings growth rates [3] - Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 22% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Borgwarner Inc (BWA) is the largest individual holding at approximately 1.28% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 9.68% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Performance Metrics - SLYV aims to match the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, which includes U.S. common equities with market capitalizations between $250 million and $1.2 billion [7] - The ETF has gained approximately 7.78% year-to-date and 3.39% over the past year, with a trading range of $67.03 to $94.78 in the past 52 weeks [8] - It has a beta of 1.03 and a standard deviation of 21.74% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8] Group 5: Alternatives - Other ETFs in the Small Cap Value space include the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) with $12.31 billion in assets and the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) with $32.32 billion [11] - IWN has an expense ratio of 0.24%, while VBR charges 0.07% [11] Group 6: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12]

Core Insights - Edison International (EIX) is a significant entity in the Utility - Electric Power sector, providing electric power and energy services [1] - The stock price of EIX is currently $59.58, with a slight increase of approximately 2.16% [3] - The company has a market capitalization of approximately $22.92 billion, indicating its substantial market presence [4] Price Target and Analyst Ratings - David Arcaro from Morgan Stanley has set a new price target for EIX at $57, suggesting a potential downside of about -4.26% from the current trading price [1][5] - EIX holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive trend in earnings estimate revisions and a favorable earnings outlook compared to its competitor, NextEra Energy, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [2][5] Stock Performance - EIX has shown significant price fluctuations over the past year, reaching a high of $81.02 and a low of $47.73, reflecting its dynamic market performance [3][5] - The trading volume on the NYSE for EIX is 1,158,472 shares, indicating active investor interest [4]

Group 1 - The bull case for Wall Street remains intact for 2026, with projected significant earnings growth and expected interest rate cuts by the Fed [1] - Some investors may consider shifting away from technology and AI stocks, potentially rotating into other market sectors as 2026 approaches [1] - Amid discussions of an AI bubble, there is a suggestion for investors to focus on value stocks [2] Group 2 - The screening process for value stocks involves selecting Zacks Rank 1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) stocks, with P/E and P/S ratios below the industry median [4][8] - The screening also considers quarterly earnings rates above the industry median and utilizes a blend of upgrades and estimate revisions to identify the top seven stocks [5][8] - BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. (BTSG) is highlighted as a strong value stock, having surged 230% since its IPO in early 2024, driven by strong earnings and revenue growth [6][7] Group 3 - BTSG operates in pharmacy services and provider services, focusing on home and community-based healthcare [9] - The company is projected to expand sales by 13% in 2025 and 15% in FY26, with adjusted earnings expected to increase by 92% in 2025 and 33% in FY26 [10] - Despite its significant stock price increase, BTSG trades at a discount in terms of forward sales compared to its industry, indicating potential value [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article compares eToro Group Ltd. (ETOR) and Marsh & McLennan (MMC) to determine which stock is a better undervalued investment option for investors in the Insurance - Brokerage sector [1] Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - eToro Group Ltd. has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Marsh & McLennan has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, suggesting that ETOR has an improving earnings outlook [3][6] Group 2: Valuation Metrics - ETOR has a forward P/E ratio of 15.62, compared to MMC's forward P/E of 18.83, indicating that ETOR may be undervalued relative to MMC [5] - The PEG ratio for ETOR is 2.15, while MMC's PEG ratio is 3.11, further suggesting that ETOR has a more favorable valuation considering expected EPS growth [5] - ETOR's P/B ratio is 2.42, significantly lower than MMC's P/B of 5.77, reinforcing the notion that ETOR is a better value option [6] Group 3: Value Grades - Based on various valuation metrics, ETOR has earned a Value grade of A, while MMC has a Value grade of D, indicating that ETOR is currently viewed as the superior value investment [6]