We we we just have a difference of a worldview. A staunch proponent of free speech, Charlie Kirk openly debated hot button issues. Go bring 10 libs.You can all have your phones and you could debate me and I'll have no notes and we'll see who wins. But in the wake of his death, that fundamental right is being challenged. A presidential warning.I would think maybe their license should be taken away. It'll be up to Brendan Kirk. We're allowed to disagree in this country.Many Americans say they're concerned ove ...

[Applause] Charlie's overarching passion was his Christianity and his devotion to his God. He believed what St. Francis taught us almost a thousand years ago that we should strive to live our lives in perfect perfect imitation of Christ.he that we should turn every day and every moment and every interaction into a prayer. And Charlie understood the great paradox that is only by surrender to God that God's power can flow into our lives and make us effective human beings. Charlie or Christ died at 33 years ol ...

Well, I think if they speak against Charlie, they ought to be fired. They've been dismissed for their actions, not for their words. >> Charlie lost his life where Jimmy Kimmel is just suspended from my job.I believe it is kind of stepping on the First Amendment, right. >> Everybody's got a personal opinion and mine is they speak out against Charlie because he was doing good for everybody and so why would you put somebody down that's doing good for everybody. >> So, they ought to be fired.Jimmy Kimmel is jus ...

Joining us now, Democratic Congressman Robert Garcia. He's ranking member of the House Oversight Committee. Congressman Garcia, thanks for joining us this evening.Let's just begin with your reaction to this bombshell reporting. >> I mean, it it's it's outrageous. Um, obviously, this is incredible levels of corruption uh coming out of this White House.The fact that this is being swept under the rug uh by the Justice Department just goes again to what is happening right now across this country and is this is ...

It is day 243 of the second Trump administration and this week take a big old breath. You needed a scorecard to keep up. The president went to England making deals and dining with the royal family at Windsor Castle.His FBI director Cash Patel went before Congress and defended his handling of the Charlie Cook and Kirk investigation in the Epstein files. The fire director of the CDC warned Congress that under RFK Jr. . the nation's public health is being pushed to a very dangerous place.Plus, the Federal Rese ...

What surprised you. You heard the comments from ranking member Garcia. What surprised you today and and and did you find him credible.I think what surprised me most is how little information he actually shared in six hours. You know, it takes a lot of work to not answer questions for six hours. And let me just put it this way.uh he showed up with a binder full of uh pre-prepared statements, evidence that he was going to use of previous statements he had disclosed. And I think it's very interesting that uh d ...

Top Republicans also are not defending everything Trump is doing as it's all cast in the open this week. A Republican senator warning the censorship effort should make everyone careful about any lines we cross and diminishing free speech while none other than Ted Cruz rebuking Trump's efforts to try to control or decide your free speech. I think it is unbelievably dangerous for government to put itself in the position of saying we're going to decide what speech we like and what we don't if the government ge ...

Free Speech & Censorship - The report highlights concerns about potential government overreach and censorship, specifically focusing on the alleged pressure from the FCC on ABC to suspend Jimmy Kimmel [1][2][6][7][11] - The core issue revolves around whether the government is unlawfully coercing private companies to suppress free speech, which is a potential violation of the First Amendment [6][7][10] - The New York Times' successful defense against a lawsuit from Donald Trump, based on First Amendment protections, is presented as a contrasting example of standing up to perceived censorship [2][3][4][24] - The report emphasizes the unanimous (9-0) Supreme Court precedent against government coercion of private entities to suppress speech [8][9][10][11] Company Response & Industry Implications - ABC and Disney's initial decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel is portrayed as "giving in" or "rushing to surrender" to government pressure, unlike the New York Times [13][20][21][24] - Disney CEO Bob Iger's leadership is under scrutiny, with concerns that he is "co-signing" government censorship instead of defending his talent and the First Amendment [22][23][24] - The report mentions potential consumer backlash, including calls for boycotts of Disney products and services [19][20] - The media industry is urged to consider the long-term implications of complying with perceived government censorship, potentially leading down a dangerous path [17][19] Political & Legal Context - Donald Trump's actions are characterized as mirroring "authoritarian approaches to silencing dissent" [14] - The report notes that even some Republicans are wary of censorship efforts [4][5] - The report suggests that the current situation presents a test of American freedom and the willingness of companies to uphold the First Amendment [25][26][27]

Joining us now, senior editor at The Atlantic and host of Radio Atlantic, Hana Rosen, staff writer for The Atlantic and MSNBC political contributor Mark Lieovich, and presidential historian and professor of history at Rice University, Douglas Brinkley. Um, all right, speaking of backlash, let us also play a a little bit from Andrew Schultz's podcast. In terms of censorship, freedom of speech is is more under attack now, honestly, than I think it has ever been. >> I don't know if that's me being hyperbolic. ...

Joining us now, staff writer at The Atlantic, Adam Seer, Atlantic staff writer and MSNBC political analyst Ashley Parker, MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin, and NBC News entertainment correspondent Khloe Melas. All right, Lisa, first I want to get the legalities uh straight here because these are private companies. They are allowed to fire somebody for what they say. That's fine. The difference here is the FCC getting involved and and the term is jaw boning. If they continue to jawbone the local stations ...