NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP announces that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors (the “Class”) who purchased or acquired the securities of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl” or the “Company”) (NYSE: OWL) between February 6, 2025 through November 16, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Should You Join This Class Action Lawsuit” Do you, or did you, own shares of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (NYSE: OWL)?Did you purchase your shares bet ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation for allegedly misleading investors regarding its business performance and sales forecasts during the specified Class Period [1][5]. Group 1: Company Performance - On October 23, 2025, Integer reduced its full-year 2025 sales guidance to a range of $1.840 billion to $1.854 billion, which was below prior expectations [3]. - The company anticipated net sales growth of -2% to 2% and organic sales growth of 0% to 4% for 2026, indicating a slowdown in growth [3]. - Management revealed that sales of three new products, including two electrophysiology devices, were expected to decline in 2026 due to slower market adoption [3]. Group 2: Stock Impact - Following the announcement of reduced sales guidance, Integer's stock price fell by $35.22 per share, or 32.3%, closing at $73.89 per share on October 23, 2025 [4]. Group 3: Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Integer made materially false and misleading statements about its competitive position in the electrophysiology (EP) manufacturing market [5]. - It is claimed that the company overstated its visibility into customer demand and mischaracterized its EP devices as long-term growth drivers for its Cardio & Vascular segment [5]. - The lawsuit contends that the positive statements made by the company regarding its business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [5].

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Integer Holdings Corporation (“Integer” or “the Company”) (NYSE: ITGR) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between July 25, 2024 and October 22, 2025, inclusive (the “Clas ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Alexandria Real Estate, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/ ...

Core Viewpoint - Jefferies Financial Group Inc. and its trade finance arm Point Bonita Capital are under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws following a probe by the SEC related to their exposure to First Brands Group, which filed for bankruptcy in September 2025 [1][4]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The SEC is investigating whether Jefferies provided adequate information to investors regarding their exposure to the auto industry, specifically concerning First Brands Group, which had $12 billion in debt at the time of its bankruptcy [4]. - Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP is examining if Jefferies and Point Bonita made materially false and misleading statements to investors regarding their significant exposure to First Brands [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On October 8, 2025, Jefferies disclosed that it and Point Bonita had approximately $715 million in exposure to First Brands' receivables, which accounted for about 25% of Point Bonita's trade finance portfolio [3]. - Following this announcement, Jefferies' stock price dropped by $4.66 per share, or approximately 8%, from $59.10 on October 7, 2025, to $54.44 on October 8, 2025 [3]. Group 3: Company Background - Jefferies is an investment banking and capital markets firm, while Point Bonita Capital serves as its trade finance arm [2]. - Both firms were closely associated with First Brands Group, an auto parts supplier that recently went bankrupt [2].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Synopsys, Inc. for securities fraud following a significant stock drop due to potential violations of federal securities laws [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, titled Kim v. Synopsys, Inc., et al., No. 3:25-cv-09410 [3]. - Investors have until December 30, 2025, to request to lead the case [3]. Group 2: Company Performance and Allegations - Synopsys provides design automation software and has seen its Design IP segment grow from 25% of revenue in 2022 to 31% in 2024 [4]. - The company claimed its customers relied on its IP to minimize integration risk and noted strength in Europe and South Korea, while also emphasizing AI development [5]. - Contrary to these claims, it was alleged that customers required more customization for IP components, negatively impacting the economics of the Design IP business [5]. Group 3: Financial Impact - On September 9, 2025, Synopsys reported Q3 2025 results, revealing a 7.7% year-over-year decline in Design IP revenue to $425.9 million and a 43% year-over-year decline in net income to $242.5 million [6]. - The stock price fell nearly 36%, from $604.37 to $387.78 per share, following the release of disappointing financial results [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation and its senior executives for securities fraud following a significant drop in stock price due to alleged violations of federal securities laws [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, titled West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Integer Holdings Corporation, et al., No. 1:25-cv-10251 [3]. - Investors have until February 9, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the case [3]. Group 2: Company Background - Integer Holdings Corporation designs and manufactures cardiac rhythm management and cardiovascular products, including electrophysiology devices [4]. - The company has been accused of overstating demand for its electrophysiology devices while publicly assuring strong sales growth [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Integer's stock price dropped by $35.22 per share, or over 32%, from $109.11 on October 22, 2025, to $73.89 on October 23, 2025, following the announcement of lowered sales guidance [6]. - The revised sales guidance for 2025 was lowered to a range of $1.840 billion to $1.854 billion, down from $1.850 billion to $1.876 billion, which was below analysts' estimates [6]. - The company projected poor net sales growth of -2% to 2% and organic sales growth of 0% to 4% for 2026, citing slower adoption of two of its electrophysiology devices [6][5].

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements regarding its North America Fiber Cement segment performance during a period of inventory destocking [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc" and is filed in the Northern District of Illinois [1]. - Investors who purchased James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025, have until December 23, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that James Hardie executives made false assurances about the strength of the Fiber Cement segment despite early signs of customer destocking [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that on August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales in the North America Fiber Cement segment due to customer destocking, which was first identified in April and May [4]. - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, James Hardie's stock price dropped by over 34% [4]. Group 3: Company Background - James Hardie designs and manufactures a variety of fiber cement building products, with manufacturing facilities located in both the United States and Australia [2]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm representing the investors, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc for failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, leading to significant financial losses for investors [3][4]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit involves allegations against James Hardie and certain executives for not disclosing critical information that violated federal securities laws during the Class Period from May 20, 2025, to August 18, 2025 [3]. - On August 19, 2025, the company revealed a 12% decline in sales in its North America Fiber Cement segment, attributed to customer destocking, which was first identified in April and May [3]. Financial Impact - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, James Hardie's share price plummeted over 34%, dropping from $28.43 per share on August 18, 2025, to $18.64 per share on August 20, 2025, representing a loss of $9.79 per share [4]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased shares during the Class Period have until December 23, 2025, to file lead plaintiff applications in the ongoing lawsuit [1][2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a securities class action lawsuit against CarMax, Inc. alleging that the company misled investors about its business stability and growth prospects, resulting in significant stock declines [2][4]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that CarMax and its executives concealed critical information regarding the company's operational challenges, leading to two major stock crashes [2][5]. - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as June 20, 2025, to November 5, 2025 [3]. Allegations - The complaint identifies two main issues that allegedly inflated the stock price: - **Unsustainable Demand**: CarMax reported strong growth for Q1 2026 but failed to disclose that this was due to a temporary surge in customer demand driven by anticipated tariffs [4]. - **CarMax Auto Finance Risk**: Management assured investors about the stability of their loan reserves, which later revealed a significant increase in loan loss provisions amounting to $142 million, a 40% sequential increase [4]. Impact on Business - The lawsuit highlights a distortion in core retail demand that could not be maintained in subsequent quarters, leading to a drastic cut in forward guidance and signaling systemic weaknesses in business operations [4]. - The stock experienced a 20% decline following the announcement of disappointing Q2 results, which included a 24% drop in net EPS and the unexpected loan loss provision [4]. Investor Actions - Investors who purchased CarMax securities during the class period and suffered losses are encouraged to contact Hagens Berman to discuss their rights and potential involvement in the lawsuit [5][6].