Core Insights - The Baltic Horizon Fund's net asset value (NAV) per unit decreased to EUR 0.6773 at the end of September 2025, down from EUR 0.6784 at the end of August 2025 [1] - The total net asset value of the Fund at month-end was EUR 97.2 million, a slight decrease from EUR 97.4 million in August 2025 [1] - The EPRA NRV as of September 30, 2025, was EUR 0.7224 per unit [1] Financial Performance - In September 2025, the Fund generated consolidated net rental income of EUR 1.0 million, down from EUR 1.1 million in August 2025 [2] - A EUR 0.5 million allowance for bad debts was recorded as part of a conservative debtor risk management approach, representing a one-time, non-cash provision [2] - Management successfully retrieved EUR 0.3 million of outstanding debts during September and expects no additional material bad debt provisions by year-end [2] Asset Management - As of the end of September 2025, the Fund's consolidated cash and cash equivalents amounted to EUR 6.0 million, an increase from EUR 5.8 million at the end of August 2025 [3] - The total consolidated assets of the Fund were EUR 237.7 million at the end of September 2025, down from EUR 238.2 million in August 2025 [3]

Core Insights - The advice to "just buy an ETF" reflects growing frustration with Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT), which have not delivered on their promise to outperform Bitcoin through innovative financing and balance-sheet strategies [1][2]. Performance Comparison - Bitcoin has increased by approximately 23% this year, while most DATs, including MicroStrategy, Semler Scientific, GameStop, and Trump Media, have significantly underperformed both Bitcoin and related ETFs [2][3]. - Only a few companies, such as Twenty One Capital and Japan's Metaplanet, have managed to outperform Bitcoin, indicating a significant gap in performance [2][3]. Structural Weaknesses - The fundamental weakness of the DAT model lies in its reliance on leverage and operational alpha, which has not translated into superior performance compared to direct Bitcoin exposure [3]. - The effectiveness of leveraging strategies is contingent on favorable conditions in equity, convertible, and debt markets, raising concerns about the sustainability of companies like MicroStrategy with substantial debt [4]. Industry Warnings - Warnings from firms like Galaxy Digital highlight that the entire DAT structure relies on a consistent premium to net asset value, drawing parallels to historical investment trust bubbles [6]. - Criticism from NYDIG points out that the commonly used "mNAV" metric may obscure liabilities and inflate perceived value by assuming unrealized debt conversions [6]. Corporate Bitcoin Adoption - Despite the challenges faced by DATs, corporate adoption of Bitcoin is accelerating, with nearly 40% more public companies holding Bitcoin compared to three months ago, according to Bitwise data [7]. - Companies like Coinbase and Bullish hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets due to their industry nature, while others use it as a hedge against fiat currency instability [8]. Differentiation of DATs - It is crucial to distinguish between DATs that hold Bitcoin and those that invest in proof-of-stake altcoins like Ethereum or Solana, as they represent different investment strategies [8]. - DATs that stake native assets and operate validators generate yield from network activity rather than leverage, potentially creating value as the underlying networks grow [9].

Core Viewpoint - Main Street Capital Corporation reported strong preliminary operating results for Q3 2025, highlighting a record net asset value per share and a significant increase in net fair value of its investment portfolio, leading to an estimated return on equity exceeding 16% for the quarter [2][5]. Financial Performance - The preliminary estimate of net investment income (NII) for Q3 2025 is projected to be between $0.95 and $0.99 per share, while distributable net investment income (DNII) is estimated to be between $1.01 and $1.05 per share [3]. - The estimated net asset value (NAV) per share as of September 30, 2025, is between $32.74 and $32.82, reflecting an increase of $0.44 to $0.52 per share, or 1.3% to 1.6%, from the previous NAV of $32.30 as of June 30, 2025 [4]. Investment Portfolio Activity - The total lower middle market (LMM) portfolio investments amounted to $106.2 million, resulting in a net increase of $61.3 million in the total cost basis of the LMM investment portfolio after accounting for repayments and realized losses [8]. - The total private loan portfolio investments were $113.3 million, leading to a net decrease of $68.8 million in the total cost basis of the private loan investment portfolio due to repayments and realized losses [8]. Upcoming Events - Main Street will release its Q3 2025 results on November 6, 2025, after market close, followed by a conference call on November 7, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time [6].

Core Insights - EfTEN Real Estate Fund AS reported stable rental income in September 2025, with consolidated rental income of €2,701 thousand, unchanged from August [1] - The Fund's net operating income (NOI) decreased slightly to €2,606 thousand, primarily due to increased VAT-related expenses in its Lithuanian subsidiary [1] Financial Performance - For the first nine months of 2025, the Fund achieved consolidated rental income of €23.68 million, reflecting a 2.7% increase year-on-year [2] - Consolidated EBITDA for the same period was €19.89 million, up 1.2% compared to the previous year [2] - The adjusted cash flow for the first nine months totaled €9.53 million, representing a 19% increase from the same period last year, driven by new acquisitions and lower interest expenses due to decreased EURIBOR [3] Dividend and Valuation - The Fund generated a potential gross dividend of €0.6666 per share, which is 12.6% higher than the previous year [4] - The net asset value (NAV) per share at the end of September was €20.4379, marking a 0.7% increase from August, while the EPRA NRV per share rose to €21.3280, up 0.8% [5]

Core Viewpoint - Great Elm Capital Corp. ("GECC") has provided an update regarding its investments in First Brands Group, LLC, which recently filed for bankruptcy, detailing the financial implications and exposure related to this investment [2][3]. Investment Exposure - GECC has investments in both First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan of First Brands, which were placed on non-accrual due to the bankruptcy filing [2]. - The direct exposure to First Brands includes approximately 0.9% across all CLOs in which GECC is invested as of June 30, 2025 [3]. First Lien Loan Details - As of June 30, 2025, GECC held a principal amount of $9.3 million in the First Lien Loan, with a fair market value of $8.8 million, representing 94.3% of the principal amount [3]. - In Q3 2025, GECC sold $4.5 million of its First Lien Loan for $4.4 million, equating to 97.9% of the principal amount [3]. - The remaining $4.8 million principal amount of the First Lien Loan is estimated to have a fair market value of approximately $1.7 million as of September 30, 2025, or 35.2% of the principal amount, leading to an expected adverse impact of about $2.8 million on net asset value [3]. Second Lien Loan Details - GECC held a principal amount of $16.2 million in the Second Lien Loan, with a fair market value of $14.5 million, or 89.5% of the principal amount, as of June 30, 2025 [3]. - The fair market value of the Second Lien Loan is expected to drop to approximately $0.9 million, or 5.5% of the principal value, resulting in an anticipated adverse impact of about $13.6 million on net asset value [3]. Net Asset Value Impact - The total direct net asset value impact from First Brands is estimated to be approximately $16.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 [3]. - GECC anticipates that the change in values of its directly held First Brands investments will adversely affect its net asset value by approximately $1.15-$1.25 per share [3]. Capital Activity Update - In August 2025, GECC issued approximately 1.3 million shares for net proceeds of $14 million and utilized its ATM program to issue an additional 1.1 million shares for approximately $13 million, totaling about $27 million in net proceeds for Q3 2025 [6]. - GECC issued $50 million principal amount of 7.75% Notes due December 31, 2030, and redeemed $40 million principal amount of 8.75% Notes, saving approximately $0.4 million in cash interest expense annually [7]. Financial Position - As of September 30, 2025, GECC estimates its debt-to-equity ratio to be approximately 1.5x, consistent with recent operating history [8]. - The company retains over $20 million of deployable cash for future investments and has $50 million available under its revolving line of credit [8].

Now the main problem and the risks with DATs is that unlike ETFs there's no system of mechanics to be able to destroy or create shares in order to track the price of the assets right so essentially you have this situation where you have this trade away from the actual net asset value of the of the all the assets in the DAT and fundamentally if you think about it on a fundamental level DAT should actually trade at a slight discount to the net asset value because there's costs involved custody and stuff like ...

Core Insights - Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. reported its net assets as of September 30, 2025, totaling $2.4 billion, with a net asset value per share of $13.91 [2][4] - The company's asset coverage ratio under the Investment Company Act of 1940 was 687% for senior securities and 505% for total leverage [2][4] Financial Summary - Total assets amounted to $3,256.3 million, with long-term investments primarily in Midstream Energy Companies (94%), Power Infrastructure (3%), and Other (3%) [4][5] - Total liabilities were reported at $326.4 million, with total leverage of $577.2 million [4][5] Investment Holdings - The ten largest holdings by issuer included: 1. The Williams Companies, Inc. - $356.6 million (11.0%) 2. Enterprise Products Partners L.P. - $318.2 million (9.9%) 3. Energy Transfer LP - $313.5 million (9.7%) 4. MPLX LP - $287.1 million (8.9%) 5. Cheniere Energy, Inc. - $269.4 million (8.3%) 6. Kinder Morgan, Inc. - $256.4 million (7.9%) 7. TC Energy Corporation - $219.3 million (6.8%) 8. ONEOK, Inc. - $192.5 million (6.0%) 9. Enbridge Inc. - $181.9 million (5.6%) 10. Targa Resources Corp. - $130.5 million (4.0%) [5][6] Company Overview - Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company focused on providing high after-tax total returns with an emphasis on cash distributions to stockholders [7]

Core Insights - Tetragon has released its Monthly Factsheet for August 2025, providing updates on its financial performance and key metrics [1]. Financial Performance - Net Asset Value (NAV) stands at $3,626 million [4]. - Fully Diluted NAV per Share is reported at $39.41 [4]. - Current Share Price (TFG NA) is $18.35 [4]. - Monthly NAV per Share Total Return is 2.6% [4]. - Monthly Return on Equity is 3.2% [4]. - The most recent quarterly dividend declared is $0.11 per share, resulting in a Dividend Yield of 2.4% [4]. Company Overview - Tetragon is a closed-ended investment company based in Guernsey, with non-voting shares listed on Euronext in Amsterdam and traded on the London Stock Exchange [2]. - The investment manager for Tetragon is Tetragon Financial Management LP [2].

Core Insights - Runway Growth Finance (NASDAQ: RWAY) has experienced a 7% decline year-to-date, which has increased its discount to its net asset value (NAV) per share while still offering a double-digit base cash dividend along with supplemental distributions [1] Group 1: Company Performance - The company is externally managed and is currently facing a significant discount to its NAV per share [1] - Despite the decline in share price, the company continues to provide attractive cash dividends, indicating a commitment to returning value to shareholders [1] Group 2: Market Strategy - Pacifica Yield is focused on long-term wealth creation by targeting undervalued high-growth companies, high-dividend stocks, REITs, and firms in the green energy sector [1]

Group 1 - New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ: NMFC) is trading at a double-digit discount to its net asset value (NAV) per share [1] - The company is providing a double-digit dividend yield that is nearly covered by net investment income (NII) [1] - The business development company (BDC) recently declared a quarterly dividend [1] Group 2 - Pacifica Yield focuses on long-term wealth creation by targeting undervalued high-growth companies, high-dividend stocks, REITs, and green energy firms [1]