Investors interested in stocks from the Automotive - Original Equipment sector have probably already heard of Magna (MGA) and Ferrari (RACE) . But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks? Let's take a closer look.We have found that the best way to discover great value opportunities is to pair a strong Zacks Rank with a great grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system. The proven Zacks Rank emphasizes companies with positive estimate revision trend ...

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Banks - Foreign sector may consider Deutsche Bank (DB) or National Australia Bank Ltd. (NABZY) as potential investment opportunities, with a closer examination needed to determine which stock is more appealing to value investors [1] Valuation Metrics - Deutsche Bank currently has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to National Australia Bank Ltd., which has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy) [3] - The Value category grades stocks based on key metrics such as P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share, which are essential for value investors [4] Specific Ratios - Deutsche Bank has a forward P/E ratio of 9.37, while National Australia Bank Ltd. has a forward P/E of 17.06, suggesting that DB may be undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for Deutsche Bank is 0.37, compared to NABZY's PEG ratio of 5.99, indicating a more favorable valuation for DB when considering expected earnings growth [5] - Deutsche Bank's P/B ratio is 0.71, while National Australia Bank Ltd. has a P/B of 2.07, further supporting the notion that DB is more attractively valued [6] Overall Assessment - Based on the Zacks Rank and Style Scores, Deutsche Bank stands out as the better option for value investors compared to National Australia Bank Ltd., with DB receiving a Value grade of B and NABZY a Value grade of C [6]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Cognizant (CTSH) and CoStar Group (CSGP) indicates that CTSH is more attractive to value investors due to its stronger earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics [1][3][6] Valuation Metrics - CTSH has a forward P/E ratio of 13.65, significantly lower than CSGP's forward P/E of 79.77, suggesting that CTSH is undervalued relative to CSGP [5] - The PEG ratio for CTSH is 1.47, while CSGP's PEG ratio is 1.91, indicating that CTSH offers better value when considering expected earnings growth [5] - CTSH's P/B ratio stands at 2.32 compared to CSGP's P/B of 3.28, further supporting the notion that CTSH is a more attractive investment [6] Zacks Rank and Style Scores - CTSH holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), reflecting positive revisions to its earnings estimates, while CSGP has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) [3] - The Style Score Value grade for CTSH is A, indicating strong fundamental metrics, whereas CSGP has a Value grade of F, highlighting its weaker valuation [6]

Core Viewpoint - Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) is currently viewed as a better investment opportunity compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) based on various financial metrics and rankings [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Analyst Outlook - Skillsoft Corp. has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a positive earnings estimate revision trend, while Climb Global Solutions has a Zacks Rank of 5 (Strong Sell) [3]. - The stronger Zacks Rank for SKIL suggests an improving analyst outlook, making it a more favorable option for investors [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - SKIL has a forward P/E ratio of 3.02, significantly lower than CLMB's forward P/E of 21.88, indicating that SKIL may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for SKIL is 0.30, while CLMB's PEG ratio is 1.82, further suggesting that SKIL offers better value considering its expected earnings growth [5]. - SKIL's P/B ratio stands at 2.12, compared to CLMB's P/B of 4.39, reinforcing the notion that SKIL is more attractively priced relative to its book value [6]. Group 3: Overall Value Assessment - Based on the analysis of various valuation metrics, SKIL has earned a Value grade of A, while CLMB has a Value grade of C, indicating that SKIL is perceived as a better value investment [6][7].

Core Insights - The article compares State Street Corporation (STT) and Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) to determine which stock offers better value for investors [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - STT has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision trend compared to NTRS, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - STT's forward P/E ratio is 11.13, while NTRS's forward P/E ratio is 14.40, suggesting STT may be undervalued relative to NTRS [5]. - The PEG ratio for STT is 1.05, compared to NTRS's PEG ratio of 1.34, indicating STT's expected earnings growth is more favorable [5]. - STT's P/B ratio is 1.31, while NTRS's P/B ratio is 1.95, further supporting STT's valuation advantage [6]. - STT has a Value grade of B, while NTRS has a Value grade of C, reflecting STT's stronger valuation metrics [6]. Earnings Outlook - STT is noted for its improving earnings outlook, which enhances its attractiveness in the Zacks Rank model [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares two companies in the Waste Removal Services sector, H20 (HTO) and Waste Management (WM), to determine which stock is undervalued and presents a better investment opportunity [1]. Group 1: Company Rankings - H20 has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Waste Management has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, suggesting HTO is likely experiencing a more favorable earnings outlook than WM [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - HTO has a forward P/E ratio of 15.45, significantly lower than WM's forward P/E of 28.05, indicating HTO may be undervalued [5]. - HTO's PEG ratio is 2.36, while WM's PEG ratio is 2.60, suggesting HTO has a better valuation relative to its expected earnings growth [5]. - HTO's P/B ratio is 1.08, compared to WM's P/B of 8.94, further supporting the notion that HTO is undervalued [6]. - HTO's Value grade is A, while WM's Value grade is C, indicating a stronger value proposition for HTO [6].

Core Insights - Investing in stocks based on valuation metrics, particularly the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, can identify opportunities with strong upside potential, especially for unprofitable or early-stage companies [1][2][10] - Low P/S stocks often trade below their intrinsic value, making them attractive for investors seeking growth at a discount [3][6] - The P/S ratio is preferred over the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio due to its reliability, as sales are harder to manipulate than earnings [7][10] Company Highlights - **Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (HG)**: Operates in specialty insurance and reinsurance, benefiting from strong execution and a clear growth roadmap. The company has a Zacks Rank 1 and a Value Score of A, with gross premiums written rising significantly [12][13] - **Macy's Inc. (M)**: Undergoing a transformation through its "Bold New Chapter" program, focusing on digital initiatives and omnichannel retailing. The company has a Zacks Rank 2 and a Value Score of A [14][15] - **Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH)**: A leading professional services company with strong growth in Health Sciences and Financial Services. The acquisition of Belcan is enhancing its portfolio, and it holds a Zacks Rank 2 with a Value Score of A [16][17] - **PCB Bancorp (PCB)**: Offers a range of banking products and services, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. The company has a Zacks Rank 2 and a Value Score of A, positioning it for sustained growth [18][19] - **PRA Group (PRAA)**: Engaged in the purchase and management of non-performing loans, benefiting from strategic acquisitions and a positive purchasing environment. The company has a Zacks Rank 2 and a Value Score of A [20][21]

Fundsmith Quick Read Fundsmith sold its entire Mastercard (MA) position in Q3 and cut Meta Platforms by over half. Fundsmith trimmed positions aggressively in 2025 with minimal buying activity. Berkshire Hathaway built cash to $382B while Fundsmith reduced equity exposure amid high valuations. If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, there are three quick questions causing many Americans to realize they can retire earlier than expected. take 5 minutes to learn more here Terry Smi ...

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of value investing and highlights specific stocks that exhibit strong value characteristics, particularly Business First Bancshares (BFST) and Northeast Community Bancorp (NECB) [2][9] Company Analysis: Business First Bancshares (BFST) - BFST has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy) and a Value grade of A, indicating strong potential for value investors [4] - The stock is currently trading at a P/E ratio of 8.38, which is lower than the industry average of 8.58 [4] - BFST's P/B ratio stands at 0.93, compared to the industry's average of 0.95, suggesting it is undervalued [5] - The P/S ratio for BFST is 1.41, which is more favorable than the industry's average P/S of 1.8 [6] - The P/CF ratio for BFST is 8.69, significantly lower than the industry's average of 16.15, indicating strong cash flow relative to its valuation [7] Company Analysis: Northeast Community Bancorp (NECB) - NECB also holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy) and a Value grade of A, making it a strong candidate for value investment [8] - The P/B ratio for NECB is 0.89, which is below the industry average of 0.95, indicating potential undervaluation [8] Summary of Value Metrics - Both BFST and NECB exhibit key valuation metrics that suggest they are likely undervalued in the current market, supported by their strong earnings outlook [9]

Group 1 - The article highlights the strong performance of the analyst team, achieving an annualized return of almost 40% over the past decade with a long-only model portfolio return of over 23 times [1] - KULR Technology Group, Inc. (NYSE: KULR) is mentioned as a company of interest, with the article serving as an update to previous coverage [2] - The author has expanded their focus to include offshore drilling, supply industry, and shipping, alongside a historical emphasis on tech stocks [3] Group 2 - The article does not provide any specific investment recommendations or advice regarding the suitability of investments for particular investors [5] - There is a disclosure stating that the author has no current positions in any of the companies mentioned and no plans to initiate any positions in the near future [4]