Company Overview - Steady Energy, a Finnish innovator in small modular reactor (SMR) technology, has secured €22 million in funding, marking a significant milestone in its development [2][3] - The company is set to begin construction of a full-scale pilot plant in the second half of 2025, positioning itself as a leader in the race for the world's first commercial SMR [3] Investment Details - The funding round was led by 92 Ventures, a Copenhagen-based investment firm focused on nuclear energy, highlighting strong private-sector confidence in Steady Energy's technology [2][5] - Lifeline Ventures, an early investor in Steady Energy, also participated in this funding round, emphasizing the attractiveness of the company's reactor technology [6] Technology and Market Potential - Steady Energy's LDR-50 reactor is designed to provide affordable, zero-emission heat, targeting the district heating market, which currently relies heavily on fossil fuels [7] - The reactor can deliver heat at a cost below €40/MWh, making it more affordable than bioenergy, conventional nuclear, and fossil fuels [7] - The technology is based on advanced research from VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, ensuring high efficiency and a near-100% emission-free operation [6][7] Strategic Vision - The CEO of Steady Energy, Tommi Nyman, stated that the technology allows utilities to reduce CO2 emissions more effectively and with better returns compared to traditional nuclear plants [4] - 92 Ventures' CEO, Anatol Kjær Knudsen, emphasized the potential for nuclear energy to play a transformative role in deep decarbonization, particularly in district heating and industrial applications [5]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported net production of 141,000 BOE per day and realized oil prices at 99% of Brent, leading to $316 million in adjusted EBITDAX and $118 million in free cash flow for Q4 2024 [19][20] - For the full year 2024, the company achieved over $1 billion in adjusted EBITDAX and generated $355 million in free cash flow, returning about 85% of free cash flow to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases [24][31] - The company ended 2024 with gross production of 163,000 BOE per day and maintained a low annual gross decline of about 6% [23][24] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The conventional oil and gas business continues to deliver robust cash flow, supported by quality proved reserves and a deep inventory, with significant synergies from low decline, low capital intensity assets [8][19] - The carbon management business is rapidly expanding, with nearly nine million metric tons per annum of carbon management projects under consideration and the first EPA class six permits received for the Elk Hills project [12][10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company expects to benefit from enhanced revenue streams in natural gas marketing and power, with resource adequacy power capacity payments projected to increase by 50% to $150 million [28] - More than 70% of expected 2025 oil production is hedged at an average price of $67 per barrel, reducing commodity price risk [27] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on sustainable efficiencies and plans to invest $285 million to $335 million in 2025, with a targeted controllable cost structure estimated to be nearly 16% lower than the pro forma combined 2023 organization [25][29] - The company aims to lead California's decarbonization efforts, with significant projects in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and partnerships with industrial players like National Cement [16][36] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the company's strong position and ability to deliver significant near-term value drivers, emphasizing the importance of shareholder returns and maintaining a strong balance sheet [34][36] - The management team highlighted the importance of carbon management as a growing sector, with increasing demand for innovative solutions to complex challenges [10][16] Other Important Information - The company has more than $1 billion in liquidity and has rebuilt cash on hand from nearly zero to over $350 million within six months post-merger [30][90] - The company redeemed roughly half of its 2026 senior notes at par, maintaining a leverage ratio of less than one [31][88] Q&A Session Summary Question: Stock price underperformance compared to peers - Management acknowledged the stock's underperformance but highlighted a strong track record of returning capital to shareholders and emphasized the company's intrinsic value [39][42] Question: Details on the buyback program - Management confirmed a buyback program with over $550 million remaining and noted that they have repurchased 18.5 million shares since the program's inception [45][46] Question: Update on data center agreements - Management discussed ongoing talks with multiple parties for data centers, emphasizing the strategic infrastructure advantage and potential for long-term contracts [49][51] Question: Addressing power redundancy in colocated opportunities - Management confirmed that their plant operates 24/7 and has standby agreements to ensure backup power, enhancing reliability [56][58] Question: Clarification on synergies and financial guidance - Management provided details on the targeted synergies from the merger, indicating that they expect to achieve significant cost improvements in 2025 [60][66] Question: Milestones for the National Cement project - Management expressed excitement about the partnership and outlined the importance of CO2 transportation solutions as part of the project [75][78] Question: Financial priorities of the new CFO - The CFO outlined priorities including maintaining a strong balance sheet, driving sustainable cash flow, and disciplined capital allocation [84][86] Question: Update on the Brookfield JV - Management reported that the JV is progressing well, with a focus on capital allocation and project execution [94][96] Question: Future outlook for oil and gas operations - Management indicated confidence in maintaining production levels and achieving a normalized investment cadence as permitting improves [113][130]

Financial Performance - Income from operations increased to $2.3 million in fiscal 2024, recovering from a significant loss of $15.6 million in fiscal 2023 [1] - Total revenue rose to $108.2 million, marking a 13.6% year-over-year increase [8] - Gross profit increased to $8.1 million, compared to a gross loss of $11.9 million in fiscal 2023 [8] - Total costs decreased by $7.1 million (6.6%) to $100.1 million in fiscal 2024, reflecting operational excellence [8] - Cash balance increased by $4.6 million in fiscal 2024, compared to a net decrease of $19.4 million in 2023 [8] Strategic Initiatives - The company is examining the viability of entering the marine decarbonization and digital carbon asset management business [3] - Plans to collaborate with global top enterprises to develop technologies for carbon capture and permanent sequestration [3] - Management emphasizes the importance of building a complete value chain from carbon capture to carbon trading [4] - The company aims to transform ship emission reductions into lasting assets, marking an evolution of the business model [5] Industry Context - The company is positioned as a pioneer in the transformation of the shipping industry, focusing on decarbonization [4] - The restructuring of the shipping industry has provided an opportunity for the company to optimize operational strategies and leverage its customer network [1] - The company connects the decarbonization needs of the maritime industry with the carbon finance market through a technology ecosystem [6]

Core Insights - HPQ Silicon Inc. is advancing its proprietary Fumed Silica Reactor (FSR) process through successful pilot-scale testing, marking a significant step towards commercial production of fumed silica [1][2][4] - The first batch test of the FSR pilot plant has produced material with characteristics consistent with lab-scale production, indicating the process's viability [2][3][5] - The company aims to transition to semi-continuous production, significantly increasing material throughput and targeting the production of at least 200 kg of commercial-grade fumed silica [7] Company Developments - HPQ Silicon's technology provider, PyroGenesis Inc., confirmed successful material production during the first batch test of the FSR pilot plant, with further analysis planned to validate product quality [2][5] - The pilot plant represents a 20-fold scale-up from laboratory conditions, focusing on replicating validated lab-scale operations while assessing performance under real-world conditions [4][5] - The upcoming batch tests will ensure consistent production of high-surface-area fumed silica, with specifications aimed to meet or exceed lab-scale results [6] Industry Context - The fumed silica industry has traditionally relied on fossil-fuel-intensive production methods, and the FSR process aims to revolutionize this by eliminating carbon emissions while maintaining product quality [8] - The transition to semi-continuous production will enhance efficiency and set a new standard for sustainable fumed silica production, aligning with global decarbonization efforts [8]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a net loss of $57 million in Q4 2024, primarily due to net derivative losses of $58 million, resulting in a negative $0.68 per diluted share [46] - Adjusted net income for Q4 2024 was approximately $1 million, or a positive $0.01 per diluted share, after adjusting for unrealized derivative losses and other non-recurring items [47] - For the full year 2024, the company generated positive adjusted free cash flow of $92 million, with an overall adjusted free cash flow margin of 15% [45] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The upstream business produced 774 million cubic feet equivalent per day in Q4 2024, exceeding the midpoint of guidance by 5% [20] - The average annual daily production for 2024 was 788 million cubic feet equivalent per day [22] - The Power JV's implied share of net loss during Q4 was about $17 million, with adjusted EBITDA of $0.5 million [38] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The average capacity factor for the Temple plants during Q4 was 38%, with total generation of 1,200 gigawatt hours [37] - Power prices averaged $36.90 per megawatt hour in Q4, with average natural gas costs of $2.50 per MMBtu, resulting in an average spark spread of $19.37 per megawatt hour [37] - ERCOT's long-term load forecast estimates overall demand could reach 150 gigawatts by 2030, nearly doubling the 2023 peak load of 85 gigawatts [10] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to redefine the concept of an energy company by combining traditional and new energy approaches, focusing on integrated energy solutions [8] - The Power business is expected to grow through increased utilization of existing assets and potential M&A opportunities [12] - The company is actively pursuing additional combined cycle units to address projected demand growth and baseload supply mismatch [13] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the long-term demand growth in ERCOT, despite short-term price moderation due to benign weather and renewable additions [11] - The company remains committed to capital discipline and systematic investment in response to market conditions [41] - Management highlighted the importance of carbon capture in decarbonizing the global economy and expressed confidence in the CCUS business growth [14][16] Other Important Information - The company plans to increase total capital expenditures for 2025 to between $320 million and $380 million, with approximately $220 million allocated for development [43] - The company is in exclusive negotiations with a global energy transition investor for a joint venture in the carbon capture business, with a timeline to finalize agreements within 90 to 120 days [16] Q&A Session Summary Question: How much capacity would the company be comfortable dedicating to a PPA? - Management indicated that they would be comfortable dedicating up to 750 megawatts of capacity for a PPA, maintaining redundancy for maintenance [59] Question: What is the latest on discussions regarding PPAs and new plants? - Management confirmed active discussions for existing plants and is also exploring agreements for new plants, indicating a strong market position [61] Question: What is the expected CCUS capital spending? - Approximately $90 million of the $130 million guidance for CCUS and other is expected to be spent on CCUS projects, with no assumption of a joint venture at this time [69][71] Question: What is the outlook for production taxes? - Management clarified that lower production taxes were due to timing impacts related to ad valorem taxes, which are expected to normalize [75][77] Question: What factors drove the strong upstream performance? - The strong performance was attributed to new well development exceeding forecasts and effective base decline management [105] Question: What is the company's strategy regarding potential joint ventures for carbon capture? - Management expressed optimism about securing a joint venture partner, emphasizing bipartisan support for carbon capture initiatives [115]

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2024 Registration No. 333-276943 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form F-1 (Amendment No. 10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Limited (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) Cayman Islands 3585 Not Applicable ...

Form F-1 (Amendment No. 9) REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Limited As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2024 Registration No. 333-276943 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) Cayman Islands 3585 Not Applicable ( ...

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2024 Registration No. 333-276943 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form F-1 (Amendment No. 8) REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Limited (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) Cayman Islands 3585 Not Applicable ( ...

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21, 2024 Registration No. 333-276943 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form F-1 (Amendment No. 7) REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Limited (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) Cayman Islands 3585 Not Applicable (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Green Circle Decarboni ...

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2024 Registration No. 333-276943 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form F-1 (Amendment No. 6) REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Limited (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) Cogency Global Inc. 122 East 42 Street, 18 Floor New York, NY 10168 telephone 1-800-221-0102 ...