5月22日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问：据报道，巴基斯坦西部俾路支省胡兹达尔地 区5月21日发生一起针对校车的爆炸袭击事件，造成至少5人死亡、38人受伤，死者中包括3名儿童。毛 宁表示，中方注意到有关报道，对此次针对校车的袭击事件表示强烈谴责。我们对遇难者表示深切哀 悼，向遇难者家属和受伤人员致以诚挚慰问。中方坚决反对一切形式的恐怖主义，将继续坚定支持巴方 打击恐怖主义，维护社会稳定，保护人民生命安全。(央视新闻) ...

巴基斯坦5月21日发生一起针对校车的爆炸袭击事件，造成至少5人死亡，包括3名儿童，另有38人受 伤。对此，中国外交部发言人毛宁表示：中方注意到有关报道，对此次针对校车的袭击事件表示强烈谴 责。我们对遇难者表示深切哀悼，向遇难者家属和受伤人员致以诚挚慰问。中方坚决反对一切形式的恐 怖主义，将继续坚定支持巴方打击恐怖主义，维护社会稳定，保护人民生命安全。 ...

Core Points - The informal meeting of foreign ministers from China, Afghanistan, and Pakistan was held on May 21, 2025, to discuss the outcomes of trilateral dialogue and cooperation [1] Group 1 - The meeting aimed to enhance political mutual trust and support Afghanistan and Pakistan in pursuing development paths that align with their national conditions, while also respecting their sovereignty, security, and national dignity [2] - The foreign ministers agreed to utilize the trilateral dialogue mechanism and plan for the sixth meeting to be held in Kabul as soon as possible [3] - There was a commitment to strengthen diplomatic ties, with Pakistan expressing willingness to elevate diplomatic relations and agree to exchange ambassadors promptly, which China welcomed [3] Group 2 - The meeting emphasized the importance of deepening cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, extending the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to Afghanistan, and enhancing regional connectivity [4] - The ministers discussed practical cooperation, expanding trade relations, and supporting Afghanistan's reconstruction and development to enhance its self-development capabilities [4] - There was a unified stance against all forms of terrorism, with a focus on law enforcement and security cooperation to combat mutual concerns regarding terrorist forces and to guard against external interference in regional affairs [4] Group 3 - The meeting concluded with a commitment to maintain regional peace and stability, creating a favorable external environment for the development and revitalization of each country [5]

Group 1 - Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Dar announced the extension of the ceasefire agreement with India until May 18 [1] - Military communications between Pakistan and India took place on May 14 and 15, leading to the agreement to extend the ceasefire [1] - Despite the ceasefire, tensions remain, with India stating that the key water treaty, the Indus Waters Treaty, is currently suspended until Pakistan ceases cross-border terrorism [1] Group 2 - Indian Defense Minister Singh called for international oversight of Pakistan's nuclear weapons by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [2] - Indian Prime Minister Modi emphasized that India will not tolerate Pakistan's "nuclear blackmail" and will respond severely to cross-border terrorism [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent military conflict between India and Pakistan has escalated tensions, with Indian Prime Minister Modi asserting a strong stance against terrorism and indicating a willingness to use military force against terrorist camps in Pakistan [1][3]. Group 1: India's Position - Modi emphasized that any future terrorist attacks on India would be met with retaliation "in its own way" [1]. - He stated that the military action against Pakistan sets a new standard in the fight against terrorism, indicating a shift in India's approach to its relationship with Pakistan [3]. - Modi declared that discussions with Pakistan would only focus on terrorism and the Kashmir issue, rejecting any notion of tolerating nuclear threats [3]. Group 2: Pakistan's Response - Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Dar expressed hope for rational dialogue, indicating that long-standing negotiations have not yet concluded [1]. - Dar claimed that Pakistan has not considered nuclear options and believes that a ceasefire is in the best interest of all parties involved [3]. - The Pakistani Finance Minister called for the restoration of the Indus Water Treaty, which India had unilaterally suspended [3]. Group 3: Recent Developments - A ceasefire agreement was reached between India and Pakistan on May 10, which was reportedly facilitated by the United States [4]. - Modi did not credit the U.S. for the ceasefire in his recent address, highlighting a potential shift in diplomatic dynamics [4].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump emphasizes that Arab nations are focused on stability, while Iran is more concerned with terrorism [1] Group 1 - Arab countries prioritize stability in the region [1] - Iran's focus is on terrorism, contrasting with the priorities of Arab nations [1]

Core Viewpoint - Indian Prime Minister Modi stated that the current era is neither a time of war nor a time of terrorism, indicating a shift in geopolitical dynamics and the need for new approaches to global security and cooperation [1] Group 1 - The statement reflects a broader perspective on international relations, suggesting a move away from traditional conflict paradigms [1] - Modi's comments may influence India's foreign policy and its approach to regional security issues, potentially impacting investment climates and economic partnerships [1] - The emphasis on cooperation over conflict could lead to new opportunities for industries focused on peacebuilding and diplomatic engagement [1]

印度总理莫迪：我们不会区分支持"恐怖主义"的政府与"恐怖组织"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - India maintains a firm and uncompromising stance against all forms and manifestations of terrorism and will continue to do so [1] Group 1 - India's foreign minister emphasizes the country's unwavering commitment to combat terrorism [1]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The conference call primarily discusses the escalating conflict between India and Pakistan, particularly focusing on the Kashmir issue and its implications for regional stability and international relations. Core Points and Arguments - **Escalation of Conflict**: The conflict between India and Pakistan escalated significantly in April-May 2025, triggered by a major terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22, resulting in 26 deaths, predominantly Indian tourists. This incident led to India's military response on May 7, marking the most intense military engagement since the 1971 war [2][5][11]. - **India's Strong Measures**: India implemented a series of strong countermeasures against Pakistan, including diplomatic sanctions, suspension of trade, and the unprecedented halt of the Indus Water Treaty, which has been in effect since 1960. This treaty is crucial for Pakistan's water supply and agricultural needs [1][9][10]. - **Military Engagement**: The military operation named "Operation Red Spot" involved 125 aircraft and resulted in casualties on both sides. India claimed to target terrorist infrastructure, while both nations reported civilian casualties, highlighting the conflict's humanitarian impact [11][13][19]. - **International Reactions**: The international community, including the US, China, and Russia, expressed concern over the potential for nuclear confrontation and called for restraint. The US notably sided with India, reflecting the strengthening US-India relations [12][16][22]. - **Long-term Implications**: The Kashmir issue remains a core dispute, with historical grievances and geopolitical competition influencing future relations. While large-scale war is deemed unlikely due to nuclear deterrence, small-scale conflicts are expected to persist [5][29][30]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - **China's Position**: China is closely monitoring the situation due to its interests in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and regional stability. The Chinese government is actively engaging with Pakistan to safeguard its investments [6][32]. - **Impact on Regional Organizations**: The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) has been significantly affected, with India boycotting meetings hosted by Pakistan since 2016, leading to its diminished effectiveness [4]. - **Domestic Factors in Pakistan**: Pakistan's internal political and economic instability, exacerbated by security issues, limits its capacity for sustained military engagement against India. The military's recent authorization for retaliatory actions could escalate tensions further [30][32]. - **Water Resource Disputes**: The Indus Water Treaty and its implications for water security are critical, as India's actions to limit water flow could provoke significant domestic unrest in Pakistan, potentially leading to military responses [31]. This summary encapsulates the key discussions and insights from the conference call, highlighting the complex interplay of military, political, and economic factors in the India-Pakistan conflict.