Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. due to a class action complaint alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its IPO and clinical data [1][2] Group 1: Legal Investigation - The investigation is focused on whether Kyverna's board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to the company [1] - A class action complaint was filed on December 9, 2024, related to the company's IPO conducted on February 8, 2024 [1] Group 2: Allegations of Misleading Information - The complaint states that Kyverna possessed adverse data related to one of its ongoing trials, which was not disclosed [2] - The undisclosed adverse data negatively impacted the company's lead product, making the trends and results in the offering documents misleading [2] - The company's discussion of risk factors was inadequate, failing to describe the risks associated with withholding clinical data [2] Group 3: Investor Impact - Investors suffered damages when the market learned the truth about Kyverna's misleading public statements [2]

Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by its board of directors following a class action complaint filed on December 7, 2023 [1] Group 1: Allegations and Market Impact - The complaint alleges that Estee Lauder misled investors with unrealistic and materially false statements about market demand for its products and inventory levels [2] - These misleading statements concealed the company's market weaknesses until May 3, 2023, when Estee Lauder announced weaker-than-expected sales and profit, leading to a third consecutive cut in its fiscal year outlook [2] - Following this announcement, Estee Lauder's stock price fell from $245.22 per share on May 2, 2023, to $202.70 per share on May 3, 2023, reflecting a significant decline [2]

Julie & Holleman, whose attorneys have helped secure hundreds of millions of dollars in prior cases, is pursuing potential legal claims based on the apparent unfairness of the deal. The firm is concerned about conflicts arising from the fact that key insiders are continuing on with the company while public TaskUs shareholders are being cashed out for a price that is well below the company's true value. Please visit https://julieholleman.com/taskus-inc/, or contact partner Scott Holleman at (929) 415-1020 or ...

Core Viewpoint - Julie & Holleman LLP is investigating the acquisition of TaskUs, Inc. by a buyer group that includes the company's three largest shareholders, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and the fairness of the deal price [1][4]. Company Overview - TaskUs, Inc. is a leading provider of outsourced digital services and next-generation customer experience to innovative companies [2]. - Wall Street analysts have set one-year stock price targets for TaskUs, averaging $18.50 per share, with a high target of $22 per share [2]. Acquisition Details - On May 9, 2025, TaskUs announced its sale to a buyer group that already controls a majority of the company's voting power, with Blackstone, Maddock, and Weir offering to buy out public shareholders for $16.50 per share [3]. - The law firm Julie & Holleman believes the buyout price is significantly below the company's true value [4]. Legal Concerns - Julie & Holleman LLP is pursuing potential legal claims based on the apparent unfairness of the acquisition deal, highlighting conflicts of interest as key insiders remain with the company while public shareholders are cashed out at a low price [4].

SAN DIEGO, May 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Shareholder rights law firm Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating whether the board of directors of TaskUs, Inc. (NASDAQ: TASK) breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed sale of the company to Blackstone, TaskUs Co-Founder and CEO Bryce Maddock, and Co-Founder and President Jaspar Weir (collectively, the “Buyer Group”). On May 9, 2025, TaskUs entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which Buyer Group will acquire all outstanding shares ...

Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Brandon Walker, Esq. Marion Passmore, Esq. (212) 355-4648 investigations@bespc.com www.bespc.com About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York and California. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit w ...

NEW YORK, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against NextEra with a Class Period from December 2, 2021, and February 1, 2023. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of NextEra have breached their fiduciary duties to the company. According to the Compla ...

Core Viewpoint - Glenbrook Capital Management, a long-time shareholder of Tejon Ranch Co., intends to support Bulldog Capital's nominees for the Board of Directors and a proposal allowing shareholders owning 10% of shares to call special meetings, citing mismanagement and lack of transparency from the current Board [1][2][5]. Group 1: Shareholder Concerns - Glenbrook highlights significant unrecognized value in Tejon Ranch despite years of mismanagement and a lack of transparency from the Board, which has not held quarterly earnings calls, unlike 97% of NYSE companies [2][5]. - The current Board's actions, including the inclusion of former CEO Gregory Bielli, are criticized for contributing to the company's poor stock performance, with Bielli's tenure marked by stagnation [3][4]. Group 2: Proposed Changes - Glenbrook supports Bulldog Capital's recognition of Tejon's untapped potential and the need for a change in direction, advocating for the election of Bulldog's nominees and the approval of Item 4 to enhance shareholder rights [4][5]. - Leading proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended voting in favor of the proposal that would allow shareholders to call special meetings, emphasizing the importance of this right for corporate governance and performance [5].

Group 1 - Johnson Fistel, PLLP has initiated an investigation into the board members of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. regarding potential breaches of fiduciary duties related to the proposed sale of the company to 3G Capital Corp [1] - On May 5, 2025, Skechers entered into a definitive agreement for a go-private transaction with 3G, where shareholders can choose to receive either $63.00 in cash per share or $57.00 in cash plus one unit in the post-closing private entity [2] - Prior to the announcement, Skechers common stock traded near $80.00 per share over the twelve months leading up to the deal [2] Group 2 - The investigation by Johnson Fistel is aimed at shareholders who believe the buyout price is too low and are interested in the details of the investigation [3] - Johnson Fistel is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in shareholder rights and has a history of representing both individual and institutional investors [4] - In 2024, Johnson Fistel was ranked in the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms, recovering approximately $90.725 million for clients in securities cases [5]

Core Viewpoint - Julie & Holleman LLP is investigating the acquisition of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. by 3G Capital, citing potential conflicts of interest and concerns that the deal price is undervalued [1][4]. Company Overview - Skechers is a footwear company controlled by the Greenberg family, which collectively owns over 60% of the company's stock and voting power [2]. Acquisition Details - On May 5, 2025, Skechers announced its sale to 3G Capital, transitioning to a private company. Stockholders may receive either $63 per share in cash or $57 per share in cash plus a share in the post-close private entity, which has trading restrictions [3]. Legal Concerns - Julie & Holleman is pursuing legal claims regarding the fairness of the acquisition deal, particularly focusing on the Greenbergs' conflicts of interest and the perceived undervaluation of Skechers [4].