Joining me now to discuss all this is Anthony Chakumba, consumer sector head at Loop Capital Markets. Anthony, you look at this and so many questions. The first one to my mind is what's the balance in the retail sector of people who are passing these incurred costs on in terms of rising prices and people who are just going to eat those costs and hit the bottom line.So what we have definitely seen is a lot of price increases and retailers are being very quiet about it because they don't want to incur the wra ...

Consumer Spending Behavior - Customers with access to loans spend at least 20% more compared to those without access [1]

Tariff Impact on Consumers - Consumers are projected to experience an annual price increase of approximately $2,400 due to tariff rates rising from around 25% to as high as 41% for specific countries and imports [2][3] - The American middle class and moderate-income consumers are strained and lack the capacity to absorb an additional $1,000 to $2,000 in costs [10][11] - Companies are resorting to shrinkflation (reducing product quantity while maintaining price) and sneakflation (gradually increasing prices) to offset tariff costs [11][12] Uncertainty and Economic Distortion - The varying tariff rates and potential for further tariffs, including a possible 100% tariff on chips, create significant uncertainty [5] - Stockpiling of goods by companies to avoid tariff increases has distorted GDP data and is expected to continue doing so for the coming months [6] - The economy's reliance on the spending of the wealthiest Americans will determine whether a recession occurs [19][20] Investment and Capital Flows - The Trump administration is using capital flows as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations, demanding increased investment from the EU and Japan [13][14] - There is uncertainty regarding the terms of investment deals, with the EU and Japan clarifying that their commitments are loans, not permanent financial bailouts [14] - Companies are hesitant to make significant investments due to uncertainty, except for sectors like data centers for big tech [31] Economic Disparity - The bottom 80% of Americans have depleted their savings from the pandemic and stimulus payments [17] - A "reverse Robin Hood effect" is occurring, with tax cuts disproportionately benefiting the wealthy while cuts to programs like Medicaid and food stamps, coupled with higher prices, impact those at the bottom [22] Consumer Sentiment and Spending - Polls indicate that a majority of people disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy and inflation [27] - Uncertainty is causing consumers to consider saving more and reducing spending [28]

All three major averages finishing in the green today. The NASDAQ up 1%. Our next guest is warning of seasonal weakness ahead for the stock market.But could strong earnings reverse the usual August malaise. Well, let's bring in RBC Capital Markets head of US equity strategy Lori Calvacina as well as region's wealth management CIO Alan Mcnite. It's great to have you both here.Alan, you're sitting here on set with me. Welcome. Let's start this conversation.What do you think of markets here. What would you be ...

I'm going to go down the list for you and show you why perhaps the fundamentals will be more at play than maybe they've been recently. It was a momentum driven market by large regard. I mentioned the buybacks.No one does more than Apple. It's the secret sauce according to CNBC Pro. I urge you to go take a look at that article as well.You can see it for yourself. The other thing is there's a lot of cash that needs to be deployed. Bank of America today.Cash levels are high and so will the need to allocate. Ca ...

Australian tourists face a levy to visit NZ sites, consumer spending weaker than expected ahead of anticipated RBA cut, Canberra awards naval contract https://t.co/uIV5HcRl8c ...

Which takes us to our talk of the tape. Is this market just taking a breather before launching its next leg higher. Or has momentum just grinded to a halt.Let's ask Adam Parker. He is Triariat's founder and CEO and a CNBC contributor. Welcome back.>> Thanks for having me. >> You make the argument that dips should be bought. Why.>> Well, you know, I think most institutional investors think we're going to get some kind of growth scare, maybe a stag inflation scare here. August through October. >> Is that what ...

Market Trends & Consumer Behavior - The restaurant sector, especially fast food, is experiencing a decline in traffic due to consumers reducing spending amid deteriorating value perception [1] - Companies are shifting strategies towards higher speed of innovation to bring traffic back [2] - Macroeconomic pressures, particularly on lower-income consumers, complicate traffic recovery [4][5] - Product news and introductions can drive short-term consumer interest [4] - Consumer movement is happening across the board, but pressure remains within the low-income consumer segment [6] Company Strategy & Performance - Companies are pursuing new value platforms to attract consumers [2] - Companies are exploring alternative measures beyond value to attract consumers [4] - The success of value items and combo meals is being closely monitored [3] - Chipotle is considered a dislocated stock with potential for recovery after a pullback [8] - Restaurant Brands International (RBI) is favored due to compressed multiples and potential for multiple expansion once resilient brands (Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes) are proven [8]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry/Company Involved - The analysis focuses on the impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) on consumer spending in the US economy, particularly in North America. Core Insights and Arguments - **Consumer Spending Impact**: A slight boost to consumer spending is expected in 2026, estimated at approximately 15 basis points (bp), but larger negative impacts are anticipated in 2027 and beyond due to tax cuts expiring and spending cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP [1][9][10]. - **Cohort Analysis**: - Older and higher-income cohorts are expected to benefit the most from the bill, particularly through deductions for seniors and an increase in the SALT cap [1][11][24]. - Low-income consumers will face significant negative impacts due to cuts in transfer payments, with estimates suggesting that around 10 million individuals could lose access to federal health insurance by 2034 [1][27]. - Middle-income consumers may experience mixed effects, benefiting in the short term from new deductions but facing potential long-term negative impacts as tax cuts expire [1][26]. Additional Important Content - **Fiscal Multipliers**: The analysis indicates that spending cuts generally have larger multipliers than tax cuts, meaning that reductions in transfer payments to low-income consumers will have a more immediate and larger impact on demand [1][15]. - **Long-term Economic Growth**: The overall boost to consumption in 2026 is considered small relative to the drags from trade and immigration policy, which are expected to slow US economic activity [1][11][29]. - **Specific Provisions**: Key consumer-facing provisions include deductions for tips, overtime, and car loan interest, as well as changes to Medicaid and SNAP, which will have varying impacts across different income cohorts [1][12][31][50]. - **Projected Economic Growth**: The OBBBA is expected to add around 40 basis points to US GDP growth in 2026, primarily driven by defense spending and corporate tax changes, rather than consumer spending [1][10]. Data and Projections - **Consumer Spending Projections**: - 2026: +15 bp boost to nominal spending - 2027: -18 bp drag on nominal spending - 2029 and beyond: Negative impacts become more pronounced as tax cuts expire [1][19][21]. - **CBO Cost Estimates**: Various provisions have associated costs, such as the tips deduction costing $10 billion in 2026 and $31 billion total, while changes to Medicaid are estimated to save $7 billion in 2026 and $115 billion total [1][16][50]. This summary encapsulates the essential insights and projections regarding the impact of the OBBBA on consumer spending and various income cohorts, highlighting both the immediate benefits and the longer-term challenges posed by the legislation.

Economic Impact - Tariffs are characterized as a substantial tax burden on both households and businesses [1] - The implementation of tariffs is negatively impacting consumer spending [1] - Tariffs are hindering job growth [1]