Core Viewpoint - REV Group (REVG) has shown strong stock performance, with a 56.9% increase since the beginning of the year, outperforming the Zacks Transportation sector and the Zacks Transportation - Services industry [1][2]. Financial Performance - REV Group has consistently beaten earnings estimates, reporting EPS of $0.7 against a consensus estimate of $0.59 in its last earnings report [2]. - For the current fiscal year, REV Group is projected to achieve earnings of $2.45 per share on revenues of $2.41 billion, reflecting a 54.09% increase in EPS and a 1.07% increase in revenues [3]. - The next fiscal year forecasts earnings of $3.36 per share on revenues of $2.6 billion, indicating a year-over-year change of 37.01% in EPS and 7.89% in revenues [3]. Valuation Metrics - REV Group has a Value Score of B, a Growth Score of A, and a Momentum Score of F, resulting in a combined VGM Score of B [6]. - The stock trades at 20.4 times the current fiscal year EPS estimates, which is above the peer industry average of 18.8 times [6]. - On a trailing cash flow basis, the stock trades at 26.1 times compared to the peer group's average of 7.5 times, indicating a premium valuation [6]. Zacks Rank - REV Group holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) due to rising earnings estimates, suggesting potential for further stock price appreciation [7]. - The combination of a Zacks Rank of 1 or 2 and Style Scores of A or B positions REV Group favorably for investors [7].

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Luxfer (LXFR) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) indicates that LXFR currently offers better value for investors based on various financial metrics and rankings [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - Luxfer has a forward P/E ratio of 11.05, significantly lower than Ingersoll Rand's forward P/E of 23.59 [5]. - The PEG ratio for Luxfer is 1.38, while Ingersoll Rand's PEG ratio is 3.21, suggesting that Luxfer is more reasonably priced relative to its expected earnings growth [5]. - Luxfer's P/B ratio stands at 1.28, compared to Ingersoll Rand's P/B of 3.08, indicating that Luxfer is trading at a lower valuation relative to its book value [6]. Zacks Rank and Style Scores - Luxfer holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while Ingersoll Rand has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting a stronger earnings outlook for Luxfer [3]. - The Style Score Value grade for Luxfer is A, whereas Ingersoll Rand has a Value grade of D, further emphasizing Luxfer's superior valuation metrics [6]. Estimate Revisions - Luxfer has experienced stronger estimate revision activity compared to Ingersoll Rand, making it a more attractive option for value investors [7].

Core Viewpoint - Bancolombia (CIB) and Banco Itau (ITUB) are both considered as potential undervalued stocks in the foreign banking sector, with a focus on their valuation metrics to determine the better investment option [1]. Valuation Metrics - CIB has a forward P/E ratio of 6.81, while ITUB has a forward P/E of 8.60, indicating that CIB may be more undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for CIB is 0.96, compared to ITUB's PEG ratio of 0.97, suggesting that both companies have similar expected EPS growth rates [5]. - CIB's P/B ratio is 1.26, while ITUB's P/B ratio is 1.88, further supporting the notion that CIB is the more attractive value option [6]. Earnings Outlook - Both CIB and ITUB currently hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revisions and improving earnings outlooks [3][6]. - CIB has been assigned a Value grade of B, while ITUB has a Value grade of D, highlighting CIB's superior valuation metrics [6].

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Quanex Building Products (NX) and Holcim Ltd Unsponsored ADR (HCMLY) indicates that NX presents a better value investment opportunity due to its stronger earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics [1][3][7]. Valuation Metrics - NX has a forward P/E ratio of 7.51, significantly lower than HCMLY's forward P/E of 20.82, suggesting that NX is undervalued relative to HCMLY [5]. - The PEG ratio for NX is 0.54, indicating a more attractive valuation when considering expected earnings growth, while HCMLY's PEG ratio stands at 2.07 [5]. - NX's P/B ratio is 0.9, compared to HCMLY's P/B of 1.44, further supporting the notion that NX is undervalued [6]. Investment Outlook - NX holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), reflecting an improving earnings estimate revision activity, while HCMLY has a Zacks Rank of 5 (Strong Sell), indicating a less favorable analyst outlook [3][7]. - Based on the combination of its improving earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics, NX is positioned as the superior value option in the current market [7].

Core Insights - Heidelberg Materials AG Unsponsored ADR (HDLMY) and Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) are both attractive options for value investors, but a closer examination is necessary to determine which stock is more appealing [1] Valuation Metrics - Both HDLMY and WMS currently hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revisions and improving earnings outlooks for both companies [3] - HDLMY has a forward P/E ratio of 15.23, while WMS has a forward P/E of 20.23, suggesting that HDLMY may be undervalued compared to WMS [5] - The PEG ratio for HDLMY is 1.18, while WMS has a PEG ratio of 1.72, indicating that HDLMY offers better value when considering expected EPS growth [5] - HDLMY's P/B ratio is 2.07, compared to WMS's P/B of 5.98, further supporting the notion that HDLMY is the more attractive value option [6] - Based on these valuation metrics, HDLMY holds a Value grade of B, while WMS has a Value grade of C, reinforcing the conclusion that HDLMY is the superior value option at this time [6]

Core Viewpoint - Orion Marine Group (ORN) has shown strong stock performance, with a 4.7% increase over the past month and a 28.2% gain since the start of the year, outperforming both the Zacks Construction sector and the Zacks Building Products - Heavy Construction industry [1] Financial Performance - The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates, reporting an EPS of $0.07 against a consensus estimate of -$0.01 in its last earnings report [2] - For the current fiscal year, Orion Marine is projected to post earnings of $0.17 per share on revenues of $827.46 million, reflecting a 13.33% increase in EPS and a 3.9% increase in revenues [3] - For the next fiscal year, expected earnings are $0.41 per share on revenues of $912.9 million, indicating a year-over-year change of 138.24% in EPS and 10.33% in revenues [3] Valuation Metrics - The stock currently trades at a high valuation of 55.3X current fiscal year EPS estimates, significantly above the peer industry average of 27X [7] - On a trailing cash flow basis, Orion Marine trades at 9.2X compared to the peer group's average of 14.4X, and has a PEG ratio of 2.21, which does not place it among the top value stocks [7] Zacks Rank and Style Scores - Orion Marine holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) due to favorable earnings estimate revisions from analysts [8] - The company has a Value Score of C, a Growth Score of B, and a Momentum Score of D, resulting in a combined VGM Score of B [6][9] - The alignment of a Zacks Rank of 1 or 2 with Style Scores of A or B suggests potential for Orion Marine shares in the near future [9]

Core Viewpoint - The analysis compares Compagnie de Saint-Gobain - Unsponsored ADR (CODYY) and TopBuild (BLD) to determine which stock represents a better undervalued investment opportunity for investors in the Building Products - Miscellaneous sector [1]. Valuation Metrics - CODYY has a forward P/E ratio of 15.83, while BLD has a forward P/E of 19.26, indicating that CODYY may be undervalued compared to BLD [5]. - The PEG ratio for CODYY is 4.12, whereas BLD's PEG ratio is 4.93, suggesting that CODYY has a more favorable earnings growth outlook relative to its valuation [5]. - CODYY's P/B ratio stands at 2.2, compared to BLD's P/B of 5.19, further supporting the argument that CODYY is the more attractive value option [6]. Investment Ratings - CODYY currently holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while BLD has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a stronger earnings outlook for CODYY [3]. - The Value grades for the two companies are B for CODYY and C for BLD, reinforcing the conclusion that CODYY is the superior value option at this time [6].

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) and ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) indicates that TD presents a better value opportunity for investors at this time [1]. Valuation Metrics - Toronto-Dominion Bank has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while ICICI Bank Limited has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting a more favorable earnings outlook for TD [3]. - TD's forward P/E ratio is 13.03, significantly lower than IBN's forward P/E of 20.80, indicating that TD may be undervalued relative to IBN [5]. - The PEG ratio for TD is 1.68, while IBN's PEG ratio is 2.23, further supporting the notion that TD is a more attractive investment based on expected earnings growth [5]. - TD's P/B ratio stands at 1.58 compared to IBN's P/B of 3.14, highlighting TD's superior market value relative to its book value [6]. - Overall, TD holds a Value grade of B, while IBN has a Value grade of C, reinforcing the conclusion that TD is the superior value option [6].

Core Insights - Universal Electronics (UEIC) is currently rated 2 (Buy) by Zacks Rank, indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is rated 3 (Hold) [3] - Value investors assess various traditional metrics to determine if a stock is undervalued, including P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share [4] Valuation Metrics - UEIC has a forward P/E ratio of 12.98, significantly lower than HAYW's forward P/E of 20.06, suggesting that UEIC may be undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for UEIC is 0.87, indicating a favorable growth outlook compared to HAYW's PEG ratio of 2.85, which suggests higher expected growth relative to its price [5] - UEIC's P/B ratio stands at 0.59, while HAYW's P/B ratio is 2.18, further supporting the notion that UEIC is a more attractive value option [6] - Overall, UEIC has a Value grade of A, while HAYW has a Value grade of C, highlighting UEIC's superior valuation metrics and earnings outlook [6]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Ameresco (AMRC) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) indicates that Ameresco presents a better value opportunity for investors at this time due to its stronger earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - Ameresco has a forward P/E ratio of 19.04, significantly lower than Talen Energy's forward P/E of 51.78, suggesting that Ameresco is undervalued relative to Talen [5]. - The PEG ratio for Ameresco is 0.76, while Talen's PEG ratio is 9.94, indicating that Ameresco's expected earnings growth is more favorable compared to its price [5]. - Ameresco's P/B ratio stands at 0.81, in contrast to Talen's P/B ratio of 11, further supporting the notion that Ameresco is undervalued [6]. Investment Grades - Ameresco holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), while Talen Energy has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), reflecting a stronger improvement in earnings outlook for Ameresco [3]. - Based on the valuation figures and earnings outlook, Ameresco is rated with a Value grade of A, whereas Talen Energy has a Value grade of C, reinforcing Ameresco's position as the superior value option [6].